F1 Fanatic

@celeste F1 is what it is at the moment, everybody knows that. As I said, all the players knew what they were getting into before the start of this season. Some teams made those tires work for them and now they […]

@tifoso1989 the energy drinks company argument is pathetic: they’ve beaten Ferrari the last four years – suck it up! They are a better formula 1 team currently.

As has been pointed out by @celeste (great […]

@celeste that’s different. They are not just fixing the delamination problems, they’ll change the way the tyres degrade.

If there’s drivers at risk, ofc a change is needed. Pirelli didn’t do that on purpose, […]

@celeste Ha! Saftey you say. Not to belittle the topic, but when drivers can do backflips and hit walls at the speeds of Webber/Kubica in Canada and walk away… they’re safe enough.

@celeste I also think 2011 had more “real” races. It just, as @nick-uk says, mid-season changes so drastic like this one are very veeeeeeeeeeery wrong.

How’s it Lotus or Ferrari fault that the others cannot do […]

@celeste

Don’t get me wrong I don’t want to see Sunday drives either. It’s not 100% because I don’t want to see Red Bull at the front again. I am massively against a fundamental change mid season that could […]

@celeste Yes I’ve just read that now and had come back to mention it!

And no, I don’t think that is a very strong argument. It sounds more like them taking a swipe at some of the criticism they’ve had from the media.

@celeste I’m not really understanding what you disagree with: do you not think drivers should theoretically be able to go to the end of the race on one set of tyres? I think that’d be okay, as long as it wasn’t […]

@celeste, I agree that Q is exciting and for me it is the only thing Bernie has got right since he started fiddling with the rules to “improve the show”.

@vettel1, Max such gentlemanly (and ladylike for @celeste) toothless regulation is what lead to a red car “accidentally” hitting the wall at Rascasse in Monte Carlo on the last lap of qualifying, a regulation […]

Sorry have to agree with @Celeste on this one, I read the whole article and he didn’t speak derogatorily about Ron Dennis in any way. It was an honest representation of who Ron is and how he runs his business, […]

@celeste It is very sad that lewis is always at the receiving end of this story. I mean everybody says how Ron and Mclaren gave him a a life and it is because of Mclaren that he is who he is today. Please keep in […]

@celeste
This article is clearly aimed at people who don’t like the guy and to steer arguments vs/against who does. And, that never fails…
Journalists know that people have a tendency to create a storm every […]

In @celeste defense you need to keep in mind the context of the comment he was replying to I think.

@jcost
I think @celeste has a crush on Hamilton and is jealous of Nicole. ;)

I think @celeste read the wrong interview.

@celeste
Actually Hamilton spoke very positively about his former team on more than one occasion, but whenever he says something even slightly critical, then boy oh boy… you people surely know how to blow it […]

@celeste your comment is COTD for me… Loved your counter argument of ant against lion.. Keep it up..

@celeste What “bad” did Lewis Hamilton say about his old boss? All he said is that there are parellels between his dad and Ron Dennis. If anything, it is a compliment of sorts.

I agree with @celeste ,I don’t think its great to keep criticising former emloyers in public, especially Ron who gave him so much. Having said that, I’d rather this than him not talk at all.