Christopher Rehn

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 60 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #419122
    Christopher Rehn
    Participant

    They all tested for F1 teams whilst racing in F2, right? So I could hazard a guess at someone like Sean Geleal, but I don’t fully understand the sequence.

    #416661
    Christopher Rehn
    Participant

    @ben-n: My bad, it was Barrichello who stalled. Your guess is very plausable, then!

    #416658
    Christopher Rehn
    Participant

    If the issue is “Pole position not taking to the start at the front”, then 2002 British GP would be correct. Assuming that stalling, or at least not starting P1 despite taking pole, is the connector and 2002 British GP is wrong, then the incident must have happened between 2001 Belgium and 2002 Britain.

    #382618
    Christopher Rehn
    Participant

    Keith, in regards to the:

    “Remarkably, all 20 drivers started all 21 races this year, which will hopefully make it a bit easier to compare them all, though inevitably the wide difference in car performance always has to be taken into account.”

    That has never happened before in F1, so that’s a record of sorts!

    1. Hamilton
    2. Alonso
    3. Ricciardo
    4. Leclerc
    5. Vettel
    6. Hülkenberg
    7. Verstappen
    8. Raikkonen
    9. Sainz
    10. Ocon
    11. Ericsson
    12. Gasly
    13. Perez
    14. Bottas
    15. Magnussen
    16. Vandoorne
    17. Hartley
    18. Sirotkin
    19. Grosjean
    20. Stroll

    #372639
    Christopher Rehn
    Participant

    Yasss, that is it. The sequence begun with Silverstone, followed by Hockenheim and Hungaroring. 20 is Spa.

    Your turn.

    #372637
    Christopher Rehn
    Participant

    That isn’t it either. It’s related to some of the circuits of this year’s calendar. This is as specific a clue as I can give.

    #372487
    Christopher Rehn
    Participant

    Not entirely sure what other clues to give this, other than this sequence is related to the 2018 season.

    #372442
    Christopher Rehn
    Participant

    Nope, not a car number.

    The number is related to places/locations.

    #372432
    Christopher Rehn
    Participant

    That is in fact not correct. Incredible coincidence indeed. It’s not poles, or wins/podiums, or even races at all.

    #372428
    Christopher Rehn
    Participant

    Oh boy. Ok, let’s think.

    1. 18
    2. 16
    3. 14
    4. ???

    No, the answer is not 12. I promise!

    #372401
    Christopher Rehn
    Participant

    If they do manage to bring Miami on-board for 2019, would it not make more sense to move Austin to a date along Canada in the spring? Say, move your entire Bahrain-Monaco period one week earlier, run Texas on 2nd June 2019 and then go along with the rest of your calendar. Running three races in quick succession in Florida-Texas-Mexico sounds counter-intuitive, they will attract much the same people and also limit F1 exposure in the mainstream US media.

    #372394
    Christopher Rehn
    Participant

    Alright. Bathurst 1000?

    If so, maybe Denny Hulme. He died at the Bathurst 1000.

    #371851
    Christopher Rehn
    Participant

    Wow. This one has me stumped. OK, chronological, but in reverse, doesn’t really go with it if it’s something they did in F1. Perkins was roughly around the same time as Jones but a liiiiittle bit earlier.

    With Klien at number one, can it be related to performances in prototype racing? There are two Aussies, and Klien did race in V8s for a while. Is it V8 Supercar related? I haven’t figured out what yet though. I will leave it for someone else to guess for a while.

    #371836
    Christopher Rehn
    Participant

    Indeed it is Jody for the second time. Swedish GP winners from the inaugural GP and onwards.

    #371805
    Christopher Rehn
    Participant

    Alright then!

    1. Denny Hulme
    2. Jody Scheckter
    3. Niki Lauda
    4. ???

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 60 total)