Forum Replies Created
18th February 2017, 12:50 at 12:50 pm #335055
“what’s wrong with women winning in F1?”
– What’s not?30th January 2017, 11:44 at 11:44 am #334621
So it’s pretty much a race, but with cars starting it at random spots around the track and the slowest cars being constantly eliminated. They could as well just start together, so you can actually follow what’s happening. You could then more easily tell which car is most likely to be eliminated next (if the grid position resembles order of pace, the way race’s does) – more on that below.
Drivers are given 5 minutes to go round in circles and choose a “clean spot”
– Which, for the viewer, would either make for 5 minutes of boring randomness or 5 minutes of drivers purposely establishing a “Fastest go first” order on the track and circling in a funeral procession, knowing that not following a slower car gives everybody a clean ride around the track for the whole duration of that “quali”.
“That would make for 20 crazy laps”
Not really. Everybody knows what the slow cars and the fast cars are. So you’d have a long series of predictable eliminations plus some random eliminations of the faster cars that got stuck in traffic.
“Every time you cross the line your own time is reset again. So every lap is a quali lap.”
Only for the slowest cars. The top cars that go 2-4 sec. per lap faster would be safe for most of the 20 laps. Everybody’s lap times would only jump into relevancy the moment all slower cars had gotten eliminated.
A top qualifier, like Hamilton, would do 10 slow laps, 7 mid paced laps, and only 3 full-out laps at the end to fight for the win.
I guess those last 3 laps could be exciting. Although it also means there would only be the last few cars left on the track, which kills the possibility of any kind of “come from behind” surprising last effort of some underdog.30th January 2017, 10:03 at 10:03 am #334619
A championship that was once the epitome of manly sports won by an Emilie or a Matilda? Please no! :(
On a side note, Bassi Massa doesn’t sound much better either, haha :)27th January 2017, 20:48 at 8:48 pm #334541
Haha, at this point they could as well organize a lottery game after races to award points at random.
The fact alone that the eventual champion always scores around 5 thousand points has always turned me off. I hate those cumbersomely high scores where half of the digits are redundant and only make it hard to get an intuitive outlook on the current championship situation.
I reckon this to compensate for boring races, where the focus naturally has to shift onto discussing statistics and all sorts of numbers. And that is totally in the vain of baseball, where statistical analysis is the language of conversation and has created a unique culture common to all American sports.25th January 2017, 12:44 at 12:44 pm #334480
Woah, Keith! You skipped the best thing from the link you provided: “Champ Car-style bodywork set for 2018”
This sounds awesome!
“That initiative will replace the overhead air intake with a low, sleek engine cover; twin-turbocharged engines from Chevy and Honda (and any new manufacturers that enter the series) will be fed from new intake scoops integrated into the sidepods.”
– This was always the hallmark of IndyCars for me.
“The rear wheel guards are expected to go from full-time use to only being retained for superspeedways, and even then, they will be smaller and less visually intrusive.”
– What a relief!
“Frye says there are parallels between IndyCar’s approach to the universal kit and the recent spate of retro-themed muscle cars.
“If you take today’s Camaro, it looks kind of like the Camaro from the 1960s but it has the big motor, all the electronics, and everything that gives it the retro look but with modern technology,” he said. “There’s probably some balance in there for what we’re looking for with the universal kit. We’ve taken photos of the Indy cars from the last couple of decades, done side-by-side comparisons on what we like and don’t like, and then we’ve taken some of those ideas to our partners, our manufacturers, and gotten their feedback on what might work on that [retro-modern] theme.””
– OMG, this is wonderful! I’m SUPER EXCITED!4th April 2015, 12:48 at 12:48 pm #295905
It’s weird how the evolution of design has lead to the head lights looking almost exactly like they looked on cars 30-40 years ago.4th April 2015, 12:45 at 12:45 pm #295904
Wow, such a long time already!
I remember that crash with great detail. The next Monday I was so shaken up at school (I was 16yo), I sketched the wreckage in my notebook several times. Greg Moore had been becoming my favourite racing driver.15th April 2012, 18:44 at 6:44 pm #199423
It’s great to see Dario Franchitti finally coming to turns with the new car.
I notice that in the 2012’s field there is way more known drivers than there initially was during the first IndyCar season after the unification.
The ones I’m familiar from ChampCar and probably from IRL as well are:
1 (11) Ryan Briscoe 0 1:08.6089
2 (12) Will Power 0.0984 1:08.7073
3 (13) Ryan Hunter-Reay 0.1074 1:08.7163
4 (1) Dario Franchitti 0.4238 1:09.0327
5 (15) EJ Viso 0.4545 1:09.0634
8 (18) Helio Castroneves 0.2330 1:09.0846
9 (3) Justin Wilson 0.2394 1:09.0910
10 (19) Tony Kanaan 0.3471 1:09.1987
12 (5) Scott Dixon 0.5142 1:09.3658
15 (8) Graham Rahal 1:09.9
18 (21) Marco Andretti 1:10.5
20 (23) Oriol Servia 1:10.6
21 (10) Alex Tagliani 1:10.8
24 (25) Sebastien Bourdais 1:10.8
I’m soo happy to have them all racing now in one series.7th April 2012, 13:33 at 1:33 pm #198132
I didin’t miss the chat @bascb!!! Huh! :-)
I had to log in as “amian”, which is my Google or some other account name. I greeted everybody with my legendary “Hello and dzień dobry my fellow hard rocking IndyCar [F1] geeks!” saying I was Damon.
What’s funny, when I said goodbye after the whole thing, I reminded all that I was Damon, and you were the person who responded, but somehow missed that. Look:
You don’t even need to scroll, it’s right there. :)
The race was awesome indeed. I’m glad we had the chat.1st April 2012, 19:04 at 7:04 pm #198125
That was a bad joke. I was looking forward to it the whole day!
I’m watching the race anyway, of course.1st April 2012, 18:50 at 6:50 pm #198123
WHERE the hell is the race chat?!?!??!?1st April 2012, 8:25 at 8:25 am #198397
By the way:
Who was the IndyCar rookie of the year 1993?
It was none other than Nigel Mansell, then currently reigning F1 World Champion.1st April 2012, 8:22 at 8:22 am #198412
Wow, one of the best F1 drivers is given the same car as anybody else, which is new to him as much as to anybody else, with the only new thing to him being the track, and all he can achieve is 14th place.
That should open some eyes and make people rethink some bias. :)1st April 2012, 8:20 at 8:20 am #198396
It’s his FIRST season in IndyCar = definition of rookie.
Being old and having experience in other racing series has nothing to do with it. All drivers who come to IndyCar, or F1 for that matter, often have as much as two decades of racing experience (e.g. having started karting at the age of 5-10, then onto all sorts of junior formulas, sports car series etc. until coming to IndyCar/F1 at the age of 25 ).3rd August 2011, 17:55 at 5:55 pm #175925
It’s not sport.
“The LSR also involves direct competition as you’re trying to beat the record that’s been set by your competitors”
No. This is not ‘direct competition’.
You could name anything in the world as sport if you wanted to.
Take a beer drinking contest at a party – fulfils all of your cryteria, and is not a sport by any means.
Matt90 brought a key point – How can it be a competition if there’s no winner nor loser?
And the records set are not even attributed to the one that drives the car, but to the car itself.