Forum Replies Created
- Posts
Rfactor is another really good one. Rfactor two and project cars are shaping up to be pretty great when they’re finished.
Money is the most important part to getting into f1. There are hugely talented drivers around the world that stray away from single awarded early because they find that securing millions in funding to move to Europe and get into f1 is simply not viable for them. This isn’t a new thing either. One example from a while back was mark skaife. An incredibly talented Aussie who proved his talent in single seaters domestically, and could have gone to Europe to pursue an f1 career, but decided it was too big a risk financially, because back then no Australian company would see any profit in sponsoring an aspiring f1 driver, and while he could get a loan to move to Europe, he was unlikely to find a competitive team in any open wheel series that would take a young Aussie with no cash. He went on to become a touring car legend instead, but those who worked with him in open wheelers believe he really had more talent for them than tin tops.
My point is, its naive to think f1 has the best drivers in the world. Maybe some of them, but I’m sure someone, somewhere has missed the boat, who has just as much talent as vettel or Alonso or who ever
My gut says they will be fine. Considering they have signed the top two aerodynamicists at red bull that work under newey, they obviously are doing everything they can to avoid the Williams situation…
I agree that this thread is pointless. What I find funny is some people trying to state things nobody could possibly know as fact. The only fact here is that we all know precisely **** all about what will happen next year. And, unless any of you are world class aerodynamic or mechanical engineers, you can’t even make so much as an educated guess. Who knows which engine will be the best? Why? Who could possibly know if Adrian newey will have any advantage? Who even knows it is him that came up with the best Rbr innovations in aerodynamics? Who’s to say it wasn’t their engineer that is leaving for mclaren? Who’s to say that ferraris engine will be any different (better or worse) than the other two? Who can say, with any kind of surety, that ferrari, having Allison and Byrne back, and updated testing facilities, won’t come out as the dominant force out of the box. None of us can know any of this. For all we know, caterham have signed a promising young engineer and will come out and take both titles next year. As incredibly unlikely as that is, you never know. Realistically, until testing starts we will continue to pose ifs and buts, and if ifs and buts were candy and nuts, wed all have a merry christmas. :)
Senna was dq from suzuka 89 because he was roll started to rejoin the race, which was prohibited in the regs. The senna docco paints prost as the villain, which has led to lots of people believing senna was better. I rate prost above senna, simply from watching their performances. Senna was quicker on his day, but took far too many risks and often crashed into other drivers and barriers. Prost was more careful, and was very professional. I liked them both, they were polar opposites, which was great for the sport. But in hindsight, Prost had the edge.
@calum good call on prodromou mate!
I’ll finish with this: as people, we only know what were told. You then have a choice to be gullible, and just accept what you’re told as gospel truth. Or you can try to educate yourself, to come to your own conclusions. The more you look into these things (provided you are capable of accepting you may not know it all), the more shocking things you will find. Asking how these things could possibly be true, you will find the answers to be equally shocking, and disgusting. We live in a hugely corrupt world. The anti corruption movement has grown by millions in less than a decade, and its snowballing, as more and more people realise they are being played for fools. To dismiss it like you have, shows extreme arrogance. I know far more intelligent people than myself who are a part of this movement. And, I only got into it by being argumentative against some of these people, until the arguments they put forward were just too well structured, and too rooted in fact, for me to ignore anymore. Once I followed their advice and looked into it. I learned a lot. Despite going into it being very skeptical.
Before asking a silly question, go look into what wtc7 contained. Seriously, either do some real reserarch, or watch those videos I linked to and research the sources contained in them. Don’t ask pointless questions on here. I only said anything to begin with because you were trying to put someone down for their point of view. You can throw the “conspiracy theorist” label around as much as you like. But by not actually learning any facts to back up your argument, you reveal a label for yourself. Sheep. Funny thing is, I’m by far and away not in a small group of people who share these beliefs. It’s an anti corruption movement that is growing exponentially, and people far smarter than you or I have joined this movement. Read ‘diary of an economic hitman’, written by an ex FBI agent. Also, learn about common law and its application in todays society. I’m done with this. If you aren’t willing to learn, how can anyone teach you? In time you will see, but for now, if you don’t open your eyes, you cannot possibly understand.
http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/
Good place to start
You missed the point entirely. The point of doing that wasn’t to demolish the twin towers, it was to create public unrest, and hatred toward the middle east, which would enable them to have public support to go to war, which worked perfectly. Well almost perfectly. Also, the towers had pools of molten steel in the basements after falling. Like you said, that isn’t possible. Don’t try to school me on something I’ve been interested in for over four years now, after doing a quick Google. I honestly don’t give a rats what you think of me, because I was skeptical and tried to argue the point with someone I know about these things until I really did research it. Also, your theory on how the towers structural integrity was compromised still doesn’t explain how it fell at the rate of freefall. Or, how wtc7 fell, also at the rate of freefall, when nothing even hit it. Like I said, I’ve done my homework. I haven’t even told you a tenth of the how’s and why’s surrounding that event. Because I know how difficult it is to change someone’s mind, when they are too convinced they already know it all. Have a good day boys
Things like “the moon landing was staged” or “titanic never sank” are true crackpot theories. But anyone would know that after a little research. But when it comes to the tradgedy of 9/11, too many important facts were conveniently swept under the carpet in the mass media, and far far too many things don’t add up. Also, its hugely dismissive to ignore firefighters who were there, and countless witnesses, who contradict official reports. Also a bit strange one of the so called “terrorists” that was suppsedly on one of the flights, turned up alive, claiming he had no idea why he was being accused of it lol. There’s a ton of stuff that is clearly made up about the events of that day. How does uncompressed jet fuel melt steel? It can’t. How does a steel framed skyscraper collapse at the rate of freefall without being professionally demolished? It cant, not if you believe the laws of physics. Why did witnesses hear explosions from the basement? Including firemen. How did a completely unrelated third building collapse, when it wasn’t even hit by anything? There is so much more I could tell you about that day that doesn’t add up. Especially if you’ve read the official report, which ignores all the facts and comes to completely unrealistic conclusions. It’s naive to think lowly peasants are told the truth about anything that might anger them. But, as I said earlier, ignorance is bliss. If you want to learn the truth, look into these things, but don’t blame me if you’re angry about the way the world is afterwards. Otherwise, just be happy in a bubble of blissful ignorance.
That’s called being gullible. To be open minded is to not dismiss something simply because you don’t understand it or don’t know if it could be true. I was brought up to always ask why, to use any means necessary to find out the truth. It’s good to research into things you don’t understand so as to broaden your knowledge. To be ignorant is to dismiss ideas you don’t understand, or which would be inconvenient if true. Do some research into fractional reserve banking. It’s the disgusting means by which the western world is run, which ensures debt only rises, making rich richer, and poor poorer. I could go into detail but this isn’t the place for it and it would take far too long. I will say this though; if you thought the “global financial crisis” the world just experienced was bad. Wait till the next credit crunch. When the us finally can’t repay their debts. They raised their debt ceiling recently, further delaying the inevitable. But the more they do that, the worse it’ll be when the debts are called in. Seriously, look it up.
That “special mindset” you’re talking about is called an open mind. Doesn’t take much research to find out why certain things are spoon fed to the people to keep them happy. As they say “ignorance is bliss” ;) I totally agree on the kers for tc though, if its true its another case of red bull genius (I won’t attribute it just to newey, he gets all the recognition despite having a stellar team of engineers in his team).
