Forum Replies Created
27th March 2014, 15:20 at 3:20 pm #254102
1. What country are you in? (and state, if applicable)
2. Which channels broadcast F1 near you?
RTL: normal resolution, available in HD as part of HD+, a collection of HD private channels
Sky Deutschland: available in HD by default
Sport1: normal resolution, available in HD as part of HD+, acollection of HD private channels
3. Do they show all the races live or only a limited number?
Sky Deutschland: Yes
Sport1: Only Highlights
4. Do they also show qualifying live?
Sky Deutschland: Yes
Sport1: Only Highlights
5. Do they also show practice sessions live?
RTL: No, highlights of FP3 on tape delay
Sky Deutschland: Yes
Sport1: Mostly, with some practice sessions for the fly-away races missing
6. If they are a subscription channel, what does a full year’s subscription cost (excluding limited time offers)?
The cheapest Sky Deutschland package involving F1 runs at €562.80 per annum. The abovementioned HD+ package (which is not needed to watch the channels, only to get their HD counterparts) runs at €50 a year, although the initial costs of pursuing a HD+ module or HD+ receiver are reasonably high (can’t name exact figures at the moment)
7. Please supply any other relevant information such as alternative viewing options
Nothing that I know of.14th December 2013, 14:01 at 2:01 pm #247149
You guys are forgetting one thing: team radio is not the only form of communication. I mean, if we assume that team radio was removed or limited, that wouldn’t help much. The big teams would simply use the money they’d save from that technology to hire some students looking for drug money to hold up shields or LCD screens with “Vettel, target time next 5 laps: 22.4″.
Admittedly, that would be bloody hilarious, but it’s not what the anti-team radio population imagines by that rule.30th November 2013, 15:46 at 3:46 pm #246555
I can’t remember whether I took part in the last ones, but here’s what I would pick:
1) Michael Schumacher
2) Sebastian Vettel
3) Fernando Alonso
4) Lewis Hamilton
5) Rubens Barrichello
6) Kimi Räikkönen
7) Ralf Schumacher
8) David Coulthard
9) Juan Pablo Montoya
10) Nick Heidfeld30th October 2013, 11:43 at 11:43 am #244420
Looks like it could be but we don’t know who’s put the clock on here and whether it’s been done accurately.
It hasn’t, at least not be the time measuring standards used for the FOM graphics. They always measure time from the point a car stands to the point it starts moving again, whereas this video looks at sheer working time. When done “properly”, I have a time of around 2.4 seconds. Still very much impressive, but no record.27th July 2013, 19:12 at 7:12 pm #239471
The question is: do they have another choice? Everyone likes to see the most talented F1 drivers get F1 seats, at least that is what I assume.
Everyone would like to see a F1 field full of deserving veterans alike. Everyone would like to see, for example, Robert Wickens and Rubens Barrichello on the grid. Sadly, what fans like is only worth so much. Sure it might help with merchandising sales and higher advertisment money but those effects are neglible and, in some cases, not even measureable. Any team that has a significant need for cash cannot afford to wait and pray for those effects and just has to look for drivers who can provide an immediate cash injection.5th July 2012, 20:46 at 8:46 pm #205151
Well, I agree in parts. A point for the fastest lap is silly since it would lead to what you have said and … to be honest, a FLAP is not an achievement with so many factors playing a role in a race.
Now, points for pole are a different story because what is a pole worth in F1 really? Especially since the advent of DRS, nothing really. However, being brilliant over one lap is a skill in itself and should be a significant achievement which during the nature of F1 races, namely them being long, is spoiled. Therefore, I think at least one point should be awarded for pole position. Should it really ever come down to the situation that one points makes a champion, then we’d still see honest competition especially due to low-fuel qualifying so it wouldn’t hurt the inherent competitive nature of the sport.3rd July 2012, 16:46 at 4:46 pm #204942
The video-makers don’t deserve respect. They’re violating copyrighted material.
… uuuuuh, the EVIL of violating copyrights.
Things I’d do as FOM:
* Put up a large poster at the HQ, reminding everyone working there to never listen to fans. They are ungrateful, don’t know what they want and therefore should never be taken into consideration expect for how to squeeze money out of them.
* That leads to the second point: F1.tv – have all races in our archives accessible on a website for a
bloody expensivereasonable fee.
* Try to keep tracks capable of hosting available on short notice to react to short-term changes in F1 popularity, i.e. a country without a race suddenly gets a race winner (see Venezuela or Mexico (yeah, yeah, I know Perez technically didn’t win anything yet), maybe supporting tracks in those regions with small injections of money.
* More teams: it would be a necessity to see 14 or even 15 teams in F1, since new teams open up new markets by themselves or by the drivers they hire. Competitiveness is secondary which wouldn’t make it too expensive to support them.
* TV deals: generally, I’d go for the German solution – one Pay TV channel which has everything and one or two free channels who have major parts of the weekend. Should that prove impossible – as it seems to be the case in the UK if I understood it correctly – obviously the party paying more cash will get the license.
* Scout the minor series for interesting characters and see whether it is possible to help them to a cockpit. Interesting characters are what could help F1 significantly. And no, Kimi Räikkönen doesn’t count: an utter lack of any character is not a character.
That should be it, at least I can’t think of anything else.14th May 2012, 13:08 at 1:08 pm #201628
Hyundai F1 was being talked about for a 2008 F1 entry and it did not even came close to materialise, so this time around it won’t be different. If we have Hyundai F1 on the grid within the next five years, I will publicly shave my head.29th April 2012, 13:36 at 1:36 pm #200506
Will Audi dominate the race, will BMW win on comeback or is Mercedes pulling out an ultimate trump card?
It’s the trump card…
Well, now that was actually a lot more exciting than a number of races last year. These new cars do their job and we had ourselves a neat event. We had the duel between Gary Paffett and Jamie Green in the early parts, Christian Vietoris vs. Mike Rockenfeller in the latter part and obviously Ralf Schumacher’s balls to the walls approach to this race.28th April 2012, 17:48 at 5:48 pm #200497
Mercedes was only 2 tenths off though… It’s BMW that is a second off.
Well, because Werner completely blew his lap. Q4 is not really what I was looking at when I talked about the balance of performance, especially given the fact that nobody really did an absolutely faultless lap. Q3 is way more significant, and there we had only two Mercedes there compared to the four Audis and BMWs each. Also Q1 saw three Mercedes out and only two Audis and even only one BMW.26th April 2012, 16:56 at 4:56 pm #183224
To be honest, I can see an upset happening this season especially with every driver having new cars. If everything turns out right, we might see an unexpected champion, for example Miguel Molina.13th March 2012, 14:36 at 2:36 pm #195452
My remotely realistic wish: scenario mode, Codemasters releases it late enough into the season that they could do it
My absolutely unrealistic wish: Lower. The. System. Require. Ments. For. The. Love. Of. HWNSNBM. AAARGH!10th March 2012, 14:34 at 2:34 pm #195143
Well, I’d rather presume that they use the Indy circuit for safety reasons – the DTM cars might be just a bit too fast to use the full course safely.8th March 2012, 14:50 at 2:50 pm #195222
I’m disappointed that I’ve seen so many cynical responses to KONY 2012. I can understand caution, and I can understand criticism, but it seems that a lot of the cynical responses are aimed at finding flaws in the logic behind the charity, as if the people looking for them are doing so because then they will feel less-guilty about ignoring Kony and his atrocities. That is, of course, a cynical view to take.
I’d be careful with that argument since it can be turned around easily. Ahem…
I’m disappointed that I’ve seen so many idealistic responses to KONY 2012. I can understand trust, and I can understand optimism, but it seems that a lot of the idealistic responses are aimed at not finding flaws in the logic behind the charity, as if the people not looking for them are doing so because then they will feel less-guilty about ignoring other awful things happening in Africa which stoppage would actually cost them something such as the Shell oil drilling in Nigeria or the low wages of cacao farmers.8th March 2012, 3:57 at 3:57 am #195213
Being cynical is a virtue, not a flaw – it allows you to see things the way they are.
Well, I for my part wouldn’t want to have anything to do with this. It’s a waste of time for me to get involved, since my involvement does not have any influence at all. Furthermore, as some critics have rightfully pointed out it’s nothing more than First World arrogance, justifying the awful things our daily demands cause in Africa by saying “Oh, but we’re fighting with you against the evil people on your continent.”