Forum Replies Created
30th May 2015, 10:01 at 10:01 am #299207
Can’t help but feel it’d be biased hugely against the leaders. If you’re in first, how are you supposed to overtake? We will end up with the leader getting the fewest points at most races.18th January 2015, 18:42 at 6:42 pm #2904278th December 2014, 21:35 at 9:35 pm #288369
No, of course not. That would imply he was purposely bad from the start of the season, as there was no race from which his performance dropped off. No reigning champion would deliberately give up on the championship before it even begins.
A more likely answer is that Vettel, having gone from an RB9 with lots of down force to a RB10 with much less downforce, he has had to adopt a whole new style to compensate for the lack of down force. Undoubtedly, he will not have much confidence in the car. Yet Ricciardo has gone from a low diwnforce torro rosso to the RB10. The STR8 will have much less down force than the RB9 even allowing for the 2014 down force cuts, so Ricciardo is still going to a car with more grip. Thus he will have far more confidence than Vettel.
Not trying to put a downer on Ricciardos performance, but I think that the car just didn’t suit Vettel. If they were competing in an RB9 I’m sure Vettel would have had the upper hand.3rd November 2014, 17:32 at 5:32 pm #283367
Any updates on this? I can’t wait!30th October 2014, 20:18 at 8:18 pm #281639
In addition to my previous post I’d also change the tyre rules. All teams would have a set amount of tyres for the whole season. They can bring as many sets and whatever types they like to whatever grand prix they like. But if they run out of a tyre type before the end of the season, tough. With the exception of wet weather tyres of course, which must be present at every grand prix. They also would not be required to use both tyre compounds (as all 4 would be available) and the top 10 quali rule would be scrapped.
It would mean that we would see some people trying to make the whole distance on hard tyres, or 2/3 stopping on super softs. Or a combination. Save some super softs for Abu Dhabi to clinch the championship, or burn them up early in the season to gain an early advantage?
I’d also give each driver one set of “qualifying” tyres only per race. Drivers can choose to use them early to guarantee a place in the top 10, or try and save them for Q3 and risk someone else beating you to it.26th October 2014, 10:28 at 10:28 am #280325
I read somewhere (can’t find it anywhere now though) that constructors have to miss no more than three races to be a constructor. So I’m guessing that, as they have done all bar three races, they can skip the rest of the season and still be constructors and get the money.19th October 2014, 21:33 at 9:33 pm #279727
1 – What is your age, gender, location(country)?
21, Male, England
2 – How often do you visit this forum/post on this forum?
Visit multiple times a day, post rarely.
3 – Do you feel the F1 Fanatic forum offers a sense of community? How does it differ to the offline F1 community?
4 – Do you find it easier to communicate and voice your opinions online on the forum, than offline face to face?
Online. Requires very little effort and only a computer, and no one can interrupt you etc.
5 – Does being part of the F1 Fanatic forum influence the drivers/teams you follow or your opinions on other drivers/teams?
6 – Do you think there’s a downside to communicating online rather than just offline?
7 – What do you think is the best aspect of communicating in the F1 Fanatic forum?
Everyone will have an opinion so you can hear things from both sides.
8 – Do you communicate with any F1 Fanatic members on Facebook/Twitter or any other messenger? If so how many, how often, in depth conversations or small talk?
Well yes, 2. I’m related to one and marrying the other! Other than that, no (I have not spoken to anyone new as a direct result of f1fanatic).
9 – Do you communicate with any F1 Fanatic members face to face? If so, give examples.
Again yes, I don’t think my Fiancee would like it if I didn’t speak to her face to face! But other than her and my brother as mentioned above, no.
10– Do you communicate with F1 Fanatic members more online or offline? Why do you think this is? Offline.15th October 2014, 20:35 at 8:35 pm #279303
The main thing that I would do is change the points system so that it goes right down to the back marker teams.
In years gone by, how will we know how competitive Virgin, Lotus and Hispania were in 2010? They all scored no points, thus at first glance appear to be equal. Likewise drivers like Kovaleinen looked as talented as Karthikeyen and Yamamoto. Plus a storming recovery drive from last to 11th looks the same points-wise as a disappointing last place, lapped 4 times including by your teammate through no reason other than bad driving!
It will also emphasise reliability, as DNFs will still get no points.
Other than that, Id stop all of these stupid “improve the show” ideas. Change DRS (to a set amount of use per lap, used anywhere and anytime the driver wishes – like KERS), no double points (maybe have double points but for double distance etc).20th September 2014, 17:44 at 5:44 pm #275382
No, he brings a lot more money than he uses up.
A quick google search indicates that Maldonado is bringing somewhere in the region of £30m. Another quick google found me a video by Eddie Jordan showing how much crashes can cost. A front wing/nosecone assembley is about £100k, suspension is about £150k a corner etc. He also detailed two big crashes in recent years – Perez’s monaco crash 2011 and the first corner incident at Spa 2012. Perez’s crash would have cost about £600k, and the TOTAL cost of the Spa 2012 would have been about £1.5 million.
It’s pretty clear that even if he caused £1.5M worth of damage every race weekend, they’d still be making money. Even then, most weekends he causes nowhere near that amount of monetary damage.12th August 2014, 22:38 at 10:38 pm #270331
Does that mean it’s available to download? I just dug out my Fiancee’s old iPod touch as I’m too impatient to wait for Android, and I can’t find it anywhere on the app store :(.8th August 2014, 14:33 at 2:33 pm #269696
Look back at the video. At 12 minutes, 5 seconds (pause it) they have Tanfield’s strategy window up, at the top it says current weather (rain) and next to it, a sun symbol with 7 mins. So yes, you can predict the weather, sort of. But given the rain in the video stops in far less than 7 minutes, I’d assume that it’s only a vague guide, like in real life.28th July 2014, 13:33 at 1:33 pm #268561
Cannot wait for this. You’ve got a guaranteed sale as soon as it’s available on Android! Unfortunately I don’t have any apple devices.
Do you have any idea at all when it’ll be released on Android? As in, are we talking days, or years?15th June 2014, 20:55 at 8:55 pm #263132
My Fiancee has Myalgic encephalomyelitis, otherwise known as Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Among the obvious symptoms (fatigue!) she also suffers from joint pains. Her condition is so severe that she had to drop out of university, and is now studying part time from home. As such, she needed a good quality desk chair!
I took a chance with this one:
They ship to Europe, but unsure of cost, sorry. If you wish, they also do an identical chair with a massage function, which is only about £15 more, but I only found it after I had purchased!
I must admit, I was a bit sceptical, due to the low price. But I took a chance, thinking that if it was rubbish then I’d use it and I’d get my Fiancee a decent one. But its absolutely brilliant! The only thing that I would change is the arms – I’d rather they were adjustable, but I didn’t expect to get one with adjustable arms without spending three times the price!
The padding is lovely and thick, incredibly comfy!
We’ve had it for about a year now, with quite a lot of use (a few hours every day) and its showing no signs of wear whatsoever. Assembly was very easy too – I did it myself, with my Fiancee occasionally lending a hand holding stuff together while I screwed it in place, but I could have done it on my own if needed.
Highly recommended!7th April 2014, 16:18 at 4:18 pm #255938
To add a few more to the list:
Malaysian GP: Hit the pit entry wall during free practice.
Monaco GP: Collided with Hamilton on lap 73.
Canadian GP: Spun
Belgian GP: Forced Hamilton off track during qualifying.
Australian GP: Spun on lap 24
Monaco GP: Collided with Chilton
And, obviously, Sunday’s fiasco with Gutierrez.25th February 2014, 9:00 at 9:00 am #249743
I’m gonna be controversial and say Vettel.
If we had this discussion after the first few races of last year, Hamilton would be the safe choice, and look what happened!