[Nomore]

Massa by quite a margin in my opinion, if Massa was to drive a Red Bull in these days, he would have shock a lot of people….just as he did when he was Raikkonen’s team mate.

[Nomore]

WOW

( ( Brawn vs Horner vs Domenicali ) vs Hembery ) vs Whitmarsh

Kaltenborn?? why is there

Can’t wait for friday, it will be more interesting than the race … it may be the first time that team principal comes to hand…

[Nomore]

Is Pirrelli tyres really giving exciting f1 racing ?

My answer, Yes since 2011

[Nomore]

@rahul1810

What is scary for 2014 is not that ALL the teams will be 5 sec slower but that some teams (Ferrari, Mercedes) could be 2-3 sec faster than anyone

This year maybe is the last year for quite a long that 4-5 teams are so close and fighting for race wins.

[Nomore]

1. Eddie Jordan before the start of the race : His driving style ( referring to F.Alonso ) is not suited for this circuit, it’s more suited to F.Massa because fernando damage the front tyres…just was wondering what Alonso could do ( with this Ferrari ) in circuit that suits his driving style ( lap everyone ? ), dammit he didnt finish that Malaysian gp..
2. Ferrari A team on Hamilton.
3.Webber trying to hit Vettel but it didn’t work for millimetres..:)
4. Alonso making strategic move to not use KERS in the long straight but only in the start straight for overtaking.
5. Mclaren in a 2 stop strategy.
6. Fernando : I’m not pushing …why setting fastest laps.
7. Last lap of the Race
8. Hamilton : he is all over the place….referring to Perez and his waving for defending positions.

[Nomore]

@magon4 LOL…i accept your reason..:) …how he runaway with it..?..he must be smart??

The funny thing with this Alonso-Vettel is that reminds me Schumi-Alonso in 2006…all the “Tifosi” were against the Spaniard (me included) and now we all root for him…just a couple of years and we probably be vettel fans..:D

[Nomore]

@matt90

I asked for a reason not opinion. What you have said it’s a opinion…and I also gave a possible reason why Villeneuve’s opinion is more relevant.

“The Schekter thing was a far more interesting”

it was interesting for you, for me not !… and probably for most of the formula 1 fans, everywhere you look he is rated as the best…and i doubt they agree with Scheckter…even in this site.

And please explain to me what is the “explained opinion” that Scheckter gave ?
I hear people say: I hate Alonso for 2007!… But what did Alonso in 2007??

Did he kill someone?
did he rob a bank?…

[Nomore]

@magon4 @bendana @matt90 @aka_robyn

https://www.racefans.net/2012/12/21/scheckter-vettel-hamilton-alonso/

Could someone give me a reasonable, logical and incontestable reason why the opinion of Jody Scheckter is more relevant and deserve to be several days in the first page than the opinion of Jacque Villeneuve ?
Statistics says: Both ex driver in formula 1 , both have driven legendary cars, both are Formula 1 world Champions.
If we want to look more careful and deeply the opinion of Jacques Villeneuve could be more relevant. Why ?

Becuase he was a formula 1 racer till 2006, he raced against : Alonso, Button, Raikkonen, R&M Schumacher, Coulthard, Hakkinen, Frentzen, Fisichella, Montoya…etc
He is more connected with this era of formula 1, while Scheckter stop racing in 1980…different epok, different drivers, different cars…..different opinions.

Anyway the only 2 differences are that Scheckter is from South America and spoke bad for Alonso while Villeneuve is from Canada and spoke bad for Vettel.

I think you all have misunderstood @catracho504, he is not saying that he don’t like the site (other way he won’t be here). He is just saying that there isn’t a equal treatment or a one way standart.
He is just making a critic and criticism should be always welcome, also for this site. Everyone that make me a critic (without offending !) is welcome. Critics are only to make you better not worse…like normal there are good or bad critics and the one that manages this site can decide if this critic is good one or a bad one.

I personally would have chosen not to publish neither Scheckter neither Villeneuve. thats my opinion.

Anyway @catracho504 in my personal opinion the reason why @keithcollantine have published the Scheckter article is not because he hate Alonso…but because there are a few Famous people (in formula 1) who crtic Alonso (maybe only Scheckter…:)..) so by publishing this, people will be more curious and more attractive for the article…In the other hand there are some people that have said the same thing about Vettel…the last was Coulthard yesterday who said he should change team to gain respect…Brundle, Niki Lauda, Hamilton…etc..There is a worldwide opinion that vettel need to prove more to gain Alonso’s respect….So the article of Vettel wouldn’t be interesting for this point of view. This is my personal opinion or maybe i would have done the same in his position…:)

About the Villeneuve opinion, i don’t agree but i also don’t disagree…simply i don’t know yet. I need from Vettel more years, and probably drive Ferrari or Mclaren and have the pressure (even when you have a bad car) to win…Vettel will probably deliver as Alonso, maybe better, maybe worse…i dont know..onyl time will tell…for now i have a huge amount of respect for a triple WDC, he had the car and he did it…and it’s not easy anyway

[Nomore]

@asanator Well we will see.

Ferrari has never been way too aggressive with the tyres, my issue is not that Ferrari will have problem with the tyres, but that possible Red Bull will correct their issues with the tyres in hot condition.

[Nomore]

Possible it can be true…and i don’t see nothing wrong since Perez was a driver of Ferrari Driver Academy, and Alonso is their primary driver.

If Ferrari has asked Perez to take care of Alonso, i can NOT even imagine what the Red Bull has asked to Toro rosso drivers to do in confront of Vettel.

The way Perez speaks it seems he is frustrated for the fact that Ferrari reject him, then the fact he is driving a Mclaren.
He should enjoy his new team and help them now that there are in trouble, instead of telling what he was doing one year ago.

[Nomore]

@brace
I must agree with you, the sensations that Australia give me is that Ferrari had the fastest car in race, instead in Bahrain 2010 i never had these sensations…Vettel was 6 sec comfortable in front of Alonso before he hit trouble. Australia is more representative of the problems that Ferrari had in the last couple of years.

People also forget that the problem for Ferrari in the last couple of years was putting the tyres in temp in cold condition, and also the problems in last year’s car in medium and low downforce corners, but in Melbourne all this problems seems to be disappear.

Anyway the key will be development through the year.

[Nomore]

Mclaren and Mercedes are good candidates…possible Mercedes

[Nomore]

I agree with all other opinions, It’s too early.

But i think we all agree that the start of the Ferrari this year is very different from 2009,2010,2011,2012.
Let’s hope the end is also..:)…which is the one that matters

It will be a long year and a strong development battle between Ferrari, Red Bull, Lotus, Mercedes.

Sorry but i dont see Mclaren in this group.

[Nomore]

I still think NO.

i don’t think Lotus have the money to compete with Ferrari and Red bull in a development race.

But Raikkonen as a driver, he absolutely deserve another championship.

[Nomore]

I said since 2007 the tires are the same for everyone…they were the same in 2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012 and are the same in 2013. We will see if we will have two tyre manufacturer since 2014 or not…since FIA has not decide if will be pirelli or another one or more then one.

[Author]

Posts