Jacques Villeneuve, Williams, Nurburgring, 1997

Villeneuve takes final win after Schumacher brothers collide

1997 Luxembourg Grand Prix flashbackPosted on | Author Keith Collantine

Jacques Villeneuve’s victory in the Luxembourg Grand Prix, held on this day 20 years ago, left Ferrari reeling.

“We’re worried we might have lost the championship today,” rued Michael Schumacher’s press officer Heine Buchinger. The Ferrari driver’s race had been ruined at the first corner when he was hit by his brother Ralf Schumacher’s Jordan.

He wasn’t the only person ruing what might have been. McLaren were on course for an emphatic one-two on home ground for engine supplier Mercedes when both their cars blew up within moments of each other.

Go ad-free for just £1 per month

>> Find out more and sign up

1997 Luxembourg Grand Prix qualifying

The Nurburgring had returned to the F1 calendar two years earlier under the title of ‘European Grand Prix’, capitalising on Schumacher’s popularity by adding a second race in Germany. But with that title now being used for the season finale at Jerez, the Nurburgring round was re-titled as the ‘Luxembourg’ Grand Prix.

The track was unchanged except for the installation of vicious new kerbs at the chicane before the final corner. Villeneuve led the drivers’ criticism of the changes. “The kerbs are harsh and if you run over them at certain points it would be easy to cut a tyre or smash a home in the monocoque,” he said. “There seems to be enough room there to have a proper corner.”

1997 Luxembourg Grand Prix grid

Row 1 1. Mika Hakkinen 1’16.602
McLaren-Mercedes
2. Jacques Villeneuve 1’16.691
Williams-Renault
Row 2 3. Heinz-Harald Frentzen 1’16.741
Williams-Renault
4. Giancarlo Fisichella 1’17.289
Jordan-Peugeot
Row 3 5. Michael Schumacher 1’17.385
Ferrari
6. David Coulthard 1’17.387
McLaren-Mercedes
Row 4 7. Gerhard Berger 1’17.587
Benetton-Renault
8. Ralf Schumacher 1’17.595
Jordan-Peugeot
Row 5 9. Rubens Barrichello 1’17.614
Stewart-Ford
10. Jean Alesi 1’17.620
Benetton-Renault
Row 6 11. Olivier Panis 1’17.650
Prost-Mugen-Honda
12. Jan Magnussen 1’17.722
Stewart-Ford
Row 7 13. Damon Hill 1’17.795
Arrows-Yamaha
14. Eddie Irvine 1’17.855
Ferrari
Row 8 15. Pedro Diniz 1’18.128
Arrows-Yamaha
16. Johnny Herbert 1’18.303
Sauber-Petronas
Row 9 17. Shinji Nakano 1’18.699
Prost-Mugen-Honda
18. Tarso Marques 1’19.347
Minardi-Hart
Row 10 19. Gianni Morbidelli 1’19.490
Sauber-Petronas
20. Mika Salo 1’19.526
Tyrrell-Ford
Row 11 21. Jos Verstappen 1’19.531
Tyrrell-Ford
22. Ukyo Katayama 1’20.615
Minardi-Hart

For the second race in a row the fight for pole position was between Villeneuve and Mika Hakkinen. But unlike in Austria it was the McLaren driver who came out on top, claiming the first pole position of his career.

“In Austria I had a perfect lap,” said Villeneuve. “Here I made a few mistakes and Mika stayed in front. That’s good. The best thing is that Michael is behind.”

Michael Schumacher had to be contend with a third-row start for his home race. It was also his one hundredths grand prix start, which Bernie Ecclestone marked in traditional fashion by applying a slab of cake to the twice-champion’s face.

Schumacher was separated from his title rival by Heinz-Harald Frentzen, who was on good form at home, and Giancarlo Fisichella’s Jordan. He shared the third row with David Coulthard, whose rapid starts in the McLaren had drawn the ire of Ferrari boss Jean Todt.

“McLaren are using an electronic throttle control system which is against the spirit of the regulations and we do not accept it,” Todt complained. “They are not the only ones, either.” Controversially, the FIA had approved a request from McLaren to use their engine rpm data as a variable in order to manage their throttle control. Their rivals suspected this allowed them to create a form of traction control which had supposedly been banned three years earlier.

Following a strong showing at the A1-Ring a week earlier, Bridgestone weren’t in as good shape at the Nurburgring. Gerhard Berger in seventh and Ralf Schumacher in eighth made it a Goodyear sweep of the top eight places, while Rubens Barrichello led the Bridgestone charge with ninth in his Stewart. Jean Alesi completed the top ten.

Three months on from suffering leg fractures at the Circuit Gilles Villeneuve, Olivier Panis returned for Prost and qualified 11th. This was a fine result from a driver whose pained manner indicated he was still some way from the end of his healing process.

Meanwhile Jarno Trulli, who had stood in for Panis, took up a commentary gig. Shinji Nakano remained in the second Prost but qualified a full second off Panis.

During qualifying Jan Magnussen’s Stewart had come to a smoky stop on the pit straight. Villeneuve, who had already collected a series of reprimands for failing to slow in yellow flag zones, was among those to pass the recovery scene. On this occasion he avoided a penalty, but at the next race in Japan a similar incident proved extremely controversial.

1997 Luxembourg Grand Prix

Neither championship contender had particularly good starts. But Schumacher’s was disastrously worse.

From sixth on the grid, Coulthard again got a terrific launch and arrived in second place behind his team mate, edging Villeneuve aside. The Williams driver then found team mate Frentzen bearing down on him.

“I had a better start than Jacques and I was alongside him and a nose ahead,” explained Frentzen afterwards. “But I was on the outside line and I didn’t want to take any risks going into that corner and take somebody off, especially Jacques.”

I had a lot of pressure around me and I tried to be tight on the inside but I touched with my front wheel his rear wheel, but only side by side, and in that manoeuvre my hand banged into the dashboard and I switched the ignition off.”

Frentzen got his car going again, albeit in 15th place. But while the Williams pair survived their first corner contact the same could not be said of the Jordans.

Fisichella started poorly while his team mate got off to a flier. Ralf Schumacher had been under the cosh of his team mate for several races, and now spied an opportunity to put one over him. But it meant sticking his car between his team mate and his brother, and the outcome was disastrous for all three.

“We all braked a bit late in the first corner and then there was not enough space for everybody,” rued the younger Schumacher. “I got hit by Giancarlo but not on purpose, he just braked a bit too late, that was the reason, so I just jumped up and hit Michael as well.” The Jordan’s rear wheel passed alarmingly close to the cockpit of his brother’s Ferrari.

Writing in his autobiography ten years later Eddie Jordan claimed Ralf had been doubly angered by the fact ‘Miss Germany’, who had accompanied him to the race, had later been seen in Fisichella’s company. Whatever the underlying cause, a furious Jordan gave both his drivers a “ferocious” dress-down afterwards. The stewards did not get involved, other than to give the younger Schumacher a formal reprimand for crossing the track on foot afterwards (Jos Verstappen received the same when he spun out later on).

Meanwhile his elder brother parked his Ferrari in the pits with bent front-right suspension. His title rival Villeneuve was now staring at an open goal.

The problem was it was occupied by two McLarens. And while Villeneuve could keep Coulthard in sight, Hakkinen was ten seconds clear of his team mate by lap 17. And Villeneuve’s hope Williams might beat McLaren in the pits was dashed 11 laps later when he and Hakkinen pitted together.

Villeneuve was at a loss to understand what had gone wrong. “I was surprised because we had a good pit stop and even though he had to put in a lot more fuel than we did, somehow he still had a big gap after the stops,” he said. “I don’t know what happened there. We are going to have to figure out why they are so quick.”

But while McLaren-Mercedes had found speed, they had not yet cracked reliability. Hakkinen had already retired from the lead at Silverstone and the A1-Ring, and at the Nurburgring he completed a hat-trick on lap 43. Not only did he have the misfortune to be robbed of a certain win on his 29th birthday but astonishingly his demise was preceded by his team mate’s a few minutes earlier. It handed Villeneuve the lead and victory on a platter.

Thanks to the first-lap commotion both Stewarts were running inside the points places at the end of the first lap for the second race running. But as in Austria neither stayed there until the end, both succumbing to technical problems before the chequered flag fell.

The second Ferrari also dropped out and that wasn’t the only problem for Eddie Irvine. “The car was just atrocious,” he complained. “It’s the worst I’ve ever had the car in the race.”

“Normally the car is fantastic in the race, today it was just a joke. I just couldn’t turn in because of the oversteer. Once you get through the oversteer, it just understeers and as soon as you put on the power it snaps into oversteer. And it was brick slow, so slow down the straights it’s unreal.”

With both Jordans, Ferraris and McLarens out, Benetton capitalised. Now under the management of Prodrive’s David Richards following the removal of team boss Flavio Briatore, the team got both cars home in the top four and completed a sweep of the leading positions for Renault power.

Another beneficiary of the high-attrition race was Pedro Diniz. Team mate Damon Hill stalled during his pit stop, allowing the Arrows driver to grab fifth. He held off Panis, who impressively grabbed a point on his return.

But Villeneuve’s second win in eight days was a body blow to Schumacher’s title hopes. It gave the Williams driver a nine-point lead with 20 available over the final two races.

“Today was terribly disappointing,” Schumacher admitted, “the worst possible result for the team and me.”

“I hoped that the other teams and cars might help me, that it would be god for us if the McLarens could finish first and second, but that did not happen.”

But two surprises lay in the future. One was a dramatic swing in Villeneuve’s title prospects when the championship headed to Suzuka.

The other was that this new force in F1, who had taken pole position on his debut, won 11 of his first 31 races and was on the cusp of clinching the championship, would never stand on the top step of the podium again.

1997 Luxembourg Grand Prix result

Pos. No. Driver Team Laps Time / gap / reason
1 3 Jacques Villeneuve Williams-Renault 67 1hr 31’27.843
2 7 Jean Alesi Benetton-Renault 67 11.77
3 4 Heinz-Harald Frentzen Williams-Renault 67 13.48
4 8 Gerhard Berger Benetton-Renault 67 16.416
5 2 Pedro Diniz Arrows-Yamaha 67 43.147
6 14 Olivier Panis Prost-Mugen-Honda 67 43.75
7 16 Johnny Herbert Sauber-Petronas 67 44.354
8 1 Damon Hill Arrows-Yamaha 67 44.777
9 17 Gianni Morbidelli Sauber-Petronas 66 1 lap
10 19 Mika Salo Tyrrell-Ford 66 1 lap
18 Jos Verstappen Tyrrell-Ford 50 Spun off
9 Mika Hakkinen McLaren-Mercedes 43 Engine
22 Rubens Barrichello Stewart-Ford 43 Gearbox
10 David Coulthard McLaren-Mercedes 42 Engine
23 Jan Magnussen Stewart-Ford 40 Halfshaft
6 Eddie Irvine Ferrari 22 Engine
15 Shinji Nakano Prost-Mugen-Honda 16 Engine
5 Michael Schumacher Ferrari 2 Accident
21 Tarso Marques Minardi-Hart 1 Engine
20 Ukyo Katayama Minardi-Hart 1 Accident
12 Giancarlo Fisichella Jordan-Peugeot 0 Accident
11 Ralf Schumacher Jordan-Peugeot 0 Accident

1997 Luxembourg Grand Prix championship standings

11 comments on “Villeneuve takes final win after Schumacher brothers collide”

  1. A weekend I remember quite well. I missed the qualifying due to a funeral, and only found out that my favourite driver had taken pole the following day (ah, the days before we had internet). And then the double retirement by McLaren (or rather, by Mercedes) within a lap of each other was something unbelievable.

  2. Given how fantastic Villeneuve was those 1st 2 years in F1 its amazing to think this was his last F1 win, Although it wasn’t as if he ever had a car that he was able to fight for wins with again after 1997.

    Also looking back at 1997 its interesting to look at how badly Williams seemed to be affected by losing Adrian Newey early in the year & just how big & immediate an impact Adrian joining McLaren seemed to have. Williams started that year with the best car yet never seemed able to develop it & seemed to stay still while McLaren & Ferrari (Who brought in Rory Byrne & Ross Brawn early in 1997) out-developed them, Catching upto & even & moving ahead of them.

    1. how badly Williams seemed to be affected by losing Adrian Newey early in the year

      I think it was losing Newey and Hill. Adrian often praised how important Damon’s feedback was in developing the car. These two were a fantastic team. Obviously losing Newey hurt them more but I think Hill played a factor in Williams performance as well.

    2. Also looking back at 1997 its interesting to look at how badly Williams seemed to be affected by losing Adrian Newey early in the year & just how big & immediate an impact Adrian joining McLaren seemed to have. Williams started that year with the best car yet never seemed able to develop it & seemed to stay still while McLaren & Ferrari (Who brought in Rory Byrne & Ross Brawn early in 1997) out-developed them, Catching upto & even & moving ahead of them.

      Williams won more Grand Prix in the whole of 1996 than they have won in the last 20 years now.

      1. Insane, also like others said, odd that his first win was in 96 and last win in 97; like alonso he made bad career choices, bar team out of all.

  3. I wonder differently Villeneuve’s career might have been had he tried for a top team instead of gambling on BAR. It seems like a waste of talent.

  4. So the erstwhile Force India (Jordan) didn’t hesitate to give a dress down to its drivers. Someone please tell this to today’s team :)

  5. i remember thinking villeneuve was going to be one of the greats but with hindsight i think it was a slightly weak period for quality drivers. additionally, it feels (warning signal for a tedious waffle) like many drivers in the 90s were in the wrong car at the right time i.e. they wasted their best years in poor machinery (alesi, hakkinen, coulthard, frentzen, herbert, barrichello – obviously some of these got their chance eventually). really high quality drivers seem to be able to show they are a step ahead even when they’re in weak cars (the greats) but those that are one rung down need to have the stars align for it go well for them (webber, button, etc.).

    i think you could put villeneuve in that category – he grasped his chance (which makes him absolutely a worthy champion) but he was fortunate to get those cars (FW18/19) when he was on scintillating form and no one had quite worked out how to beat him.

    1. Speaking of waffle (!), imho, that period had several teams that were all capable of winning but had some kind of Achilles heal. Mclarens awful reliability, Benetton’ drivers ability to lose the plot on set up, Williams’ mysterious ability to screw up tactics, Ferrari’s tendency to combust under pressure. All these teams won but never really dominated, even Jordan have won a GP that year.
      Nowadays all the teams are far too efficient imo & some of the variables for shooting themselves in the foot have gone. Unfortunately, it’s variables like this that make sport entertaining.

  6. In 1997 McLaren were really struggling with reliability; it is completely insane that they finished even behind Benetton in the constructor’s championship given the speed they had. They weren’t the only team pushing the envelope in an extreme way, but I think it did them more bad than good. In this race, when they were 1-2 after the start and clearly faster than anyone else, they could have started to save the engine early on. The fact that the engines blew within a lap of each other pretty much indicates that they were overstretched. This should have been an easy McLaren 1-2 and Häkkinen’s first win.

  7. I missed the start of this race back on the day. My abiding memory is that, when I switched on the tv, all the cars were either blue or grey!
    Watched it aagain recently & it was an entertaining enough race. Although Murray Walker’s commentary tends to enliven even the dullest race….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments are moderated. See the Comment Policy and FAQ for more.
If the person you're replying to is a registered user you can notify them of your reply using '@username'.