F1

Daftest F1 Rule?

This topic contains 8 replies, has 9 voices, and was last updated by  Anonymous 6 years, 2 months ago.

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #129825

    Ratboy
    Keymaster

    in all the years of F1 what do you think to of been the daftest/worse rule that the FIA has implemented?

    I will add my own later as i’m still working on it but how about you all?

    #175420

    Herman
    Participant

    The use two tyre compounds rule :3

    #175421

    Tom L.
    Participant

    Not strictly a rule, but taking away Yuji Ide’s superlicence seemed counterproductive to their aim of “improving the spectacle”!

    #175422

    JustAnF1Fanatic
    Participant

    i dont mind the both types of tyre, but starting on quali tires i dont like

    #175423

    Prisoner Monkeys
    Participant

    Daftest rule?

    Anyone who lodges a protest against Ferrari automatically loses, while any protest lodged by Ferrari automatically wins.

    taking away Yuji Ide’s superlicence seemed counterproductive to their aim of “improving the spectacle”

    Ide was racing in 2006. “Improving the show” didn’t become the party line until about 2008-09.

    #175424

    Red Andy
    Participant

    At the moment, it’s the two-compounds-per-race rule.

    Historically it was single-lap qualifying. What a shower.

    #175425

    Icthyes
    Participant

    Engine freeze. Did it really save any money? Seems to me they just ploughed the same money into aero packages instead.

    #175426

    Dan Thorn
    Participant

    The compound qualifying format used for the first half of 2005. Terrible.

    #175427

    Anonymous

    shaing tv coverage with sky tv

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.