FOTA looking to buy ownership stake in F1
- This topic has 7 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 11 months ago by Icthyes.
- AuthorPosts
- 7th May 2011, 6:46 at 6:46 am #129342nikMember
This is a great idea. The series and brand should be controlled by the participants, just like it is in tennis, football and other sports
7th May 2011, 9:18 at 9:18 am #168313IcthyesParticipantI’d like to know where the billions are going to come from. Long-term it’s a feasible plan, but I don’t see it happening soon especially if News Corp do buy it, which will jack up the valuation of the sport.
7th May 2011, 9:40 at 9:40 am #168314Red AndyParticipantI don’t think FOTA ownership is such a great idea. FOTA is a very unbalanced organisation politically, with the bigger teams having a disproportionate influence. When you have the likes of Ferrari saying they don’t even want the smaller teams in F1 at all, you have to question whether FOTA would be capable of acting in the sport’s best interests.
7th May 2011, 12:15 at 12:15 pm #168315nikMember@Red Andy the point of them owning part of F1 as a unit would be to structure it single share single vote like the English Premier League and other sports. Which means that Ferrari don’t have the sway they have now and can’t do anything about ‘smaller teams’
They don’t need to find billions – they only need to find a few hundred million and some PE leverage (if they want to buy all of it)
This is what F1 was supposed to be, until bernie took control of the areas that make money (I doubt martin would do the same)
7th May 2011, 13:31 at 1:31 pm #168316IcthyesParticipantHow would such a buy-out plan work, Nik? I don’t know much about financial technical stuff
7th May 2011, 23:05 at 11:05 pm #168317Prisoner MonkeysParticipantI don’t think FOTA ownership is such a great idea. FOTA is a very unbalanced organisation politically, with the bigger teams having a disproportionate influence. When you have the likes of Ferrari saying they don’t even want the smaller teams in F1 at all, you have to question whether FOTA would be capable of acting in the sport’s best interests.
I agree with this. You can’t have the people who play by the rules being the ones to set and enforce those rules. It’s one of the main reasons why the infamous breakaway series was doomed to fail from its inception. I’m all for giving the teams more influence, but I don’t think they should have a controlling stake. I very much doubt they have enough money to buy the rights, unless they pool their end-of-season payouts – but even then, the team who wins the WCC will have the most say in the running of the sport, and the teams that finish 11th and 12th will have none at all. FOTA already have enough bargaining power with the Concorde Agreement.
7th May 2011, 23:09 at 11:09 pm #168318AndrewTannerParticipantIt depends on the Concorde Agreement. The future of the sport depends on the outcome of that. The teams must mature and show some solidarity. Even if they don’t want a stake in the sport they need a united front to face any potential new owner.
What the teams need to do is separate the sport side of the business from the economical and political side of it. Sounds a little naive to suggest I know, but that’s the best way forward in my opinion.
7th May 2011, 23:40 at 11:40 pm #168319IcthyesParticipantI didn’t realise holding the commercial rights to a sport enables you to change its rules…
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.