@peartreeactive 5 hours, 48 minutes ago
Forum Replies Created
22nd August 2017, 4:05 at 4:05 am #348015
It’s a ligier js 4122nd August 2017, 4:01 at 4:01 am #348014
Ricardo Rosset18th August 2017, 3:44 at 3:44 am #347821
@bradley13 You are right, not quite what I meant but I think you are worthy of a correct answer. I tried to make it harder cause I assumed it would be too easy.
As you know Fangio won 5 championships, and as in this game you have to connect 4 f1 words, the question was related to Fangio’s long standing record, of having won with 4 different manufacturers, you got the Fangio connection and you mentioned championships, so, I guess that’s enough. Over to you.13th August 2017, 5:21 at 5:21 am #347791
I won something!
After carefullv reading the rules, here it goes.
Complete the sequence
Alfa romeo, mercedes, ferrari…12th August 2017, 1:42 at 1:42 am #347781
It’s Senna isn’t it?8th July 2017, 3:53 at 3:53 am #345490
So scary. Regardless of red flags, what was that car doing? He wanted to have a go at the track. He comes out, doesn’t look, apparently has the turning circle of a train.25th June 2017, 16:52 at 4:52 pm #344766
That’s an ambulance, it’s red cause it’s fire-fighter’s, possibly volunteers as well. Unbelievable.4th June 2017, 5:30 at 5:30 am #343493
So Farina won the f1 world championship, Sam Hanks won the Indy 500, Piero Taruffi won the mille miglia, so only the winner 24 hours of LeMans left, is it Mike Hawthorne?20th April 2017, 2:23 at 2:23 am #340730
I rather have a commentator that’s watching the same race as I am. In my view the role of the commentator is to fills the gaps in my knowledge as a viewer and also provides information that I’m not willing to take my eyes of the screen for, such as timings, gaps, strategies, etc.
On the 2nd part, I have felt a commentator was pretending the race is more spectacular or competitive than it really was, which is why I felt Crofty was hyping up, he pretty much said it himself, live, Crofty said he knew it was a long shot but he had to be excited with the prospect of Hamilton coming back, in the end I think he was not wrong to do so but I still think commentators shouldn’t hype up. I feel Crofty is pressured to deliver that excitement, that’s what I meant with the “it’s Crofty’s job to hype up” comment. Definitely not the excitement Murray Walker had for F1. Crofty, he’s always trying to be entertaining trying to push sky, he’s bias because he’s on sky’s side.
Edwards excitement I feel is more genuine, it’s not that Edwards hypes up when there’s nothing to be excited about but rather Edwards truly believing on a different outcome. Edwards gets excited about Lewis and the Brits which is only natural, sometimes though I feel like Edwards is a bit distracted, he makes more mistakes and old fashioned assumptions, for instances he picks up on anything to say that Max might be a bit immature.
I’d rather have the Brundle and Coulthard of old, they were together for just a season but they had the perfect stance.10th February 2017, 2:50 at 2:50 am #334851
The disconcerting truth is that there are many respected news outlets that do fabricated, fickle articles and click bait articles that exercise their opinion above factual information, often focusing in opinion rather than actual verified trusted content. F1 is so secretive that sensational stories and rumours are hard to tell apart, it’s entertaining nonetheless. Journalists do like to play hero, superstar or genius, although I think often these fake or copy paste news are the result of media companies relying on computer generated articles rather than actual living journalists. They’ve got the voice and so influence the world with it. I wouldn’t censor daily mail I just suggest not following the media unthinkingly.1st December 2015, 17:25 at 5:25 pm #309944
Verstappen on Ericsson. Not the cleanest move but it was all on the brakes, as the STR couldn’t even follow the Sauber on the long straight.30th October 2015, 17:41 at 5:41 pm #308087
Nonquestion, In my view you are comparing F1 today with it’s worse decade, especially the latter half. I understand that we are comparing Turbo with Turbo but we’re also comparing monopoly with monopoly.1st October 2015, 4:02 at 4:02 am #306451
Massa is the key to Brazilian viewership. In other words the Hulk reversal can’t be applied. To his defence, the stewards are known to have a more lenient stance regarding starts.1st April 2015, 13:36 at 1:36 pm #295681
I agree with PorscheF1, although I should highlight that all of your hypothesis live under the same roof, even Porsche. Iestyn Red Bull has a long term sponsorship of the audi DTM of some drivers but the same happened last year with one BMW, Da Costa’s, RBR have ruled out making their own engines, anything can change though, Ilmor is tagging along with Renault so who knows what twists lay ahead, I wouldn’t bet on KTM, there a tech chasm ahead them.31st March 2015, 17:01 at 5:01 pm #295628