Virgin Racing launch VR-01

F1 pictures

Virgin VR-01

Virgin Racing are the first of the new F1 teams to launch their 2010 car.

See below for more pictures and information about the VR-01.

Designer Nick Wirth has created the VR-01 entirely using Computational Fluid Dynamics computer modelling. This is not a new technology for F1 – but relying on it instead of a wind tunnel to create a new car is a novel approach.

Wirth believes CFD is the best way for teams to develop F1 cars under F1’s new resource restrictions:

Today is a very proud day for everyone involved with Virgin Racing, however on this occasion, where the car is the star, I want to pay tribute to all the amazing people at Wirth Research who deserve so much of the credit for the VR-01. Putting together an F1 team, assembling an engineering group and designing a new car from scratch is an epic task in the timeframe we have been working to.

I have been fortunate to have worked with the very best designers in F1 and I am well aware of exactly what it takes to be successful in this sport. When you see what the existing teams have achieved using the conventional but proven design approach, it is unsurprising that there is a great deal of scepticism about our all-CFD approach. But we are competing in a sport that is undergoing significant change having come face to face with today’s harsh economic realities. Under resource restriction, convention will become too costly and necessity really will be the mother of invention. I have absolute belief in the digital design process and the opportunity to put the all-CFD approach to the test at the highest level – to demonstrate that this could be the way for the future of F1 – is very, very exciting.
Nick Wirth

The team, originally named Manor Motorsport, are using Cosworth’s CA2010 V8 engines this year.

Team principal John Booth said:

Not only do we have a great bunch of people at Virgin Racing, we also have a great-looking car. We are delighted with our fantastic new livery which provides a fitting integration of our racing brand with our important commercial partnerships. All in all, we have a lot to look forward to as we progress towards our racing debut in Bahrain next month.
John Booth

He also explained why the car was not ready in time for the test at Valencia this week:

The first stage in our on-track evaluation programme is our two-day shakedown at Silverstone on Thursday and Friday this week, where we will conduct systematic testing and confidence-building of all car parts and on-car systems. It was always intended that we would miss the first all-team test in Valencia this week and very early on we targeted the second Jerez test in two weeks’ time for our public testing debut. It is a testament to our methodical approach and the sheer hard work of the team that we are heading to Spain a week earlier than planned to take part in the first Jerez test next week.
John Booth

Virgin chairman Sir Richard Branson added:

I’m sure we will be measured by how fast the car is on the track in Jerez next week, but I hope that doesn’t overshadow the far bigger achievement of pulling an entire racing team together and taking a brave step that defies convention. In many ways this is an exploration, but given the absolute self-belief we have seen, I can’t help but feel very excited about what we can go on to achieve in the years ahead.

For now though I’m looking forward to seeing the VR-01 on track in testing in the coming weeks as we prepare for Virgin Racing’s very first grand prix.
Richard Branson

Virgin VR-01 pictures

VR-01 dimensions

Length: 5,500mm
Height: 950mm
Width: 1,800mm
Wheelbase: 3,200mm

2010 F1 car launches

Images ?é?® Virgin Racing

Advert | Go Ad-free

278 comments on Virgin Racing launch VR-01

1 3 4 5 6 7 10
  1. Keith Collantine (@keithcollantine) said on 3rd February 2010, 11:50

    Looks like they’ve picked up the FXPro sponsorship from BMW – and what’s the sponsor under Alvaro Parente’s armpit?

  2. Penelope Pitstop said on 3rd February 2010, 11:54

    The car looks great. But is it just me, or have all the drivers’ photos from the various launches been really unflattering? Poor Glock, he looks like a hobbit!

  3. Maciek said on 3rd February 2010, 11:56

    Definitely old-school looking, though that’s not necessarily a good thing. Front wing – I imagine it’s so bare for the moment since they’re still hard at work on the details.

    • Maciek said on 3rd February 2010, 11:59

      The livery is kind of ok – the choice of red and black is good, but the white stripe in between kind of spoils the whole thing… a bit.

  4. No. The front wing does have two supports.

    If you really closely, you can see that the inside of the far support has a white pattern on it (a gunsight maybe?) which gets abruptly cut off where the near support overlaps in front.

    I’m sure there’s two there, just hard to see as they look close together and are black.

    • Scribe said on 3rd February 2010, 13:06

      ScarbsF1 is the legendary 2010 technical twitterer, definately give all his pics so far a look.

      The car looks fairly good except for the incredibly simplistic front wing. I’m sure they’ll be updates for that but the front wing, especially in todays era is after the diffuser the single most important racing element.

      Look at the BGP01, part of it’s sucsess came from having a front wing four or five steps ahead of the competition.

  5. Xighor said on 3rd February 2010, 11:59

    VR Twitter says: “More pictures to follow in a short while…delay due to sponsor contract obligations”. What could this mean?

  6. Is there just the one photo available? I’ve seen it on five different sites now.

    I agree, I was also hoping for more black, but this livery is leagues better most.

  7. Prisoner Monkeys said on 3rd February 2010, 11:59

    I think Virgin might be trying to pull a fast one on us here: it’s a simple front wing, and Parente seems very carefully-positioned in front of the front wing there. I wouldn’t be surprised if the car looks very different in those departments come Bahrain …

    • GeeMac said on 3rd February 2010, 12:36

      That’s the only logical conclusion that you can reach when you see the VR-01’s wing alongside the very complex desgins that Sauber and Toro Rosso have come our with…

  8. NomadIndian said on 3rd February 2010, 12:00

    They have included floral free-hand sort of designs in the livery! Don’t think I like it but distinctive for sure.

    Also could have done with a lot less of the Red.
    But overall, some thing fresh!

  9. that’s..uh..one very nice livery :D

  10. DanThorn said on 3rd February 2010, 12:07

    Pretty nice, great livery and it looks quite aggressive.

    Now, if I pretend that Branson is in no way involved perhaps I can support them! Will definately be supporting Di Grassi anyhow.

  11. Stealthman said on 3rd February 2010, 12:08

    Both the livery and the car are the best-looking so far for me. :D

  12. Oeeeeeeeeehwaaaaa.. What a nice livery. And what an awesome forms the car has.

  13. MarkC said on 3rd February 2010, 12:15

    1995 McLaren MP4-10 was entirely computer designed, and featured a needle nose (this one looks quite sharp too). Perhaps a feature of computer designed cars? (I hope the other feature of the MP4-10 – too narrow for Mansell to get in – isn’t also part of this car)
    Love the look, love the livery, hope it does well!
    Links for those interested in MP4-10:
    http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/on-the-fast-track-with-mclaren-1575111.html
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McLaren_MP4/10

    • The MP4/10 may have been the first entire CAD/CAM design but it did at least see the inside of a windtunnel.

      The VR-01 has had no windtunnel time, instead the team has used CFD to come up with the aerodynamic package. Most F1 teams use CFD but as well as conventional windtunnel work. The Virgin car is the first F1 car to be designed using CFD only.

      • MarkC said on 3rd February 2010, 12:48

        Exactly! Gonna be interesting to see how it fairs next to conventional wisdom. On a related note: USF1 are promising a radical car to, and their own in house (now transverse) gear box (http://www.usf1formula1.com/2010/01/transverse-gearbox-by-flood1.html)

      • LewisC said on 3rd February 2010, 13:19

        As I understand it, CFD doesn’t say “make it this shape” – it’s not like you turn the computer on and it says ‘here’s your car’.
        You give it a shape and then it evaluates how well that works, possibly suggesting areas where it’s sub-optimal.
        A computer is quite likely to say that a fatter, flatter frontal area isn’t ideal – it’s the designer’s decision how far they take that ‘recommendation’ though.

        • MattP said on 3rd February 2010, 14:37

          Computers and CFD have improved quite a lot since 1995…

        • Absolutely, there’s still an enormous role for the design team – but instead of testing out new designs in a windtunnel they get tested on a computer instead. And Virgin have done that without any windtunnel data of the VR-01 to verify what the CFD is telling them.

1 3 4 5 6 7 10

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.