Hamilton: Villeneuve and Mansell ‘should keep opinions to themselves’

F1 Fanatic round-up

In the round-up: Lewis Hamilton responds to champions’ comments on his future

Links

Top F1 links from the past 24 hours:

Hamilton says focus is on winning races (BBC)

“I find it kind of funny. Certain people, I’m not sure that anyone really cares what some of those people are talking about, or their opinions. I think that if you have an opinion, just keep it to yourself.”

How race promoters try to shape F1′s rules (Autosport, subscription required)

“As no less than eight promoters sit on the Formula 1 Commission – almost one-third of the total complement of 26 seats – the question of their overall influence is obviously an issue, particularly as [Australian Grand Prix chairman Ron] Walker believes the circuits are able to hold F1 to ransom over an unknown quantity, namely the sound of engines that have yet to be designed, let alone tested or raced.”

Ross Brawn – ‘Nothing Ever Stays The Same’ (The Race Driver)

“Cars are born 12, 18 months before you see them. The car we ran last year was conceived long before Michael joined us. Trying to win the championship in ’09 with a pretty slimmed-down team didn’t leave a lot to spare for the build of a good car for 2010. I think our 2011 car is not bad. It’s the first car designed by John Owen, our new chief designer; it’s the first complete car he’s designed. So I think it’s pretty impressive but it’s not where we want to be. John’s next car will for sure be a lot better.”

A good car now is a good step for 2012 (Ferrari)

“If we are competitive in England, then it confirms we have improved a lot and have reduced the gap to the other teams. We will also see how much we have improved our performance with the Hard Pirelli tyres, which we have not used them since Barcelona.”

Doughnuts galore if happy Button can win at Silverstone (The Independent)

“You can’t do those track invasions any more because of health and safety, but they’re amazing to watch. And we aren’t allowed to pick up flags any more, and it would be nice to do that, too. So if I win I would be doing doughnuts even if they aren’t allowed either; I wouldn’t care about that by that point.”

Vettel eyes British success

“If the German laps Silverstone half as fast this weekend as he did the Top Gear test track in deepest, darkest Surrey he will be celebrating a double victory come Sunday night when a special British GP-themed episode of the show is broadcast.”

CT in line to host Grand Prix (Eye Witness News)

“According to [Bernie] Ecclestone, negotiations for its return are in the final stages. ‘I’m hoping we can make a decision as soon as our lawyers have a good look at them… within the next couple of weeks.’”

Construction Site timelapse: June 1 – June 30 (YouTube)

Senna wins audience award (Working Title)

“Senna has won the Audience Award for Best International Feature at the LA Film Festival.”

Yesterday and tomorrow (Grand Prix)

“Technicians of tomorrow are easier to find thanks to F1 in Schools, an initiative that has the blessing of the F1 teams and encourages school kids to design and build miniature projectiles powered by an explosion of CO2.”

Follow F1 news as it breaks using the F1 Fanatic live Twitter app.

Comment of the day

Girts on Daniel Ricciardo’s forthcoming F1 debut:

I like Ricciardo. He is positive, good looking and smiles a lot. His answers to the media questions are actually interesting to read/hear. It’s much too soon to declare him a future world champion and he has to prove himself yet. But the signs are good.

I don’t think it’s necessarily bad to start a career with a backmarker team. Alonso drove a Minardi in his first year. The engineers will see Ricciardo’s true potential anyway, no matter how bad the car is.

What I don’t like is that he will need to spend a lot of time letting the other cars lap him, which is something he probably isn’t used to. I have recently started to think that the idea of getting rid of the blue flags is actually not that stupid.
Girts

From the forum

Considering an extra F1 Fanatic Live for this weekend’s IndyCar race at Toronto – post here if you’re interested.

Site updates

Added some more accounts to the F1 Fanatic Twitter Directory including Pastor Maldonado’s race engineer Xevi Pujolar and Jerome d’Ambrosio’s race engineer Mark Hutcheson:

These are also in the Live Twitter app:

Happy birthday!

No F1 Fanatic birthdays today. If you want a birthday shout-out tell us when yours is by emailling me, using Twitter or adding to the list here.

On this day in F1

Nigel Mansell won the first F1 race held at the Circuit Nevers on this day 20 years ago.

Mansell passed home hero Alain Prost to win, leading home the French driver who was using the new Ferrari 643 for the first time.

Ayrton Senna completed the podium in third place.

Advert | Go Ad-free

130 comments on Hamilton: Villeneuve and Mansell ‘should keep opinions to themselves’

1 2 3
  1. Hmm, not sure why Hamilton thinks his opinions are any better than Villeneuve’s or Mansell’s…

    • David-A (@david-a) said on 7th July 2011, 0:50

      Except Hamilton didn’t mention Villeneuve or Mansell, or say his opinions are better than theirs.

      • sw6569 (@sw6569) said on 7th July 2011, 8:07

        Exactly. I think the title is a misquote.

        He could have been referring to Lauda’s comments or anyone else’s.

      • John H said on 7th July 2011, 9:25

        Indeed, what is with the title of this article? It kind of suggests he names Villeneuve and Mansell personally, although strictly of course the quotations are in the correct place. Hmmmm.

        • John H said on 7th July 2011, 9:29

          Sorry, I know it’s easy to criticise but best to be honest I guess. I’m not sure I agree with Hamilton that people should keep their opinions to themselves however, if I did I wouldn’t be posting any comments!

      • Fixy (@fixy) said on 7th July 2011, 10:08

        I think we’ve had enough criticism of Lewis by now. It’s almost four weeks since Canada, in Valencia he did nothing wrong and he should be left alone. Until he crashes into everyone on lap 1 at Silverstone, there is nothing to blame him for. And even in that case, after 3 days the story ends. It can’t go on forever.

    • Valentino said on 7th July 2011, 0:51

      He just thinks he is Senna, and that everyone hates him and is against him. But no, he is not good as Senna was, and everyone loved Ayrton. But if Hamilton continues to act as he is, of and on the track, soon everyone is going to ignore and hate him.

      • Mwoerne said on 7th July 2011, 1:11

        Valentino, lay off the Haterade. Not everyone loved Ayrton, and not everyone loves Lewis. That being said, not everyone loves Alonso, and certainly not everyone loves Schumacher, all of whom are/were some of the best talents this sport has ever seen. Whether or not Lewis is as good as Ayrton is not the issue here- and even if it were, many could make the argument that Lewis may be just as talented as he was (although, just as rightly, many may argue that he is not). Lewis is simply answering questions from journalists, and you, sitting on your couch at home, have the audacity to psychoanalyze the guy- give me a break. That being said, why does Mansell seem to dislike Hamilton so much? I feel like every time Mansell talks about Lewis, it’s in a very patronizing and disagreeable manner.

        • Valentino said on 7th July 2011, 1:15

          As I said, because Hamilton thinks he is Senna.

          • David-A (@david-a) said on 7th July 2011, 1:34

            Hamilton doesn’t think he is Senna. Senna is simply his inspiration.

          • Maksutov said on 7th July 2011, 2:11

            @David A

            There are numerous occasion where Hamilton compares himself to Senna. And this started in his early days. In fact on one interview back in 2008 he was quoted as saying: “I know that I am as good as Ayrton Senna was.” he actually denied that he said he was “better” but instead later said that he was as good, which is a little disturbing. Do a search and you find plenty of articles on it. Sure everyone is aware that Hamilton is not actually physically Senna, but it is his attitude and personal thoughts about himself and other drivers that matter, and I believe that is what Valentino is referring to. here is another example:

            http://www.formula1blog.com/2011/03/29/hamilton-im-senna-and-alonso-is-prost/

            What Hamilton truly “thinks”, he revealed back in Monaco.

          • Valentino said on 7th July 2011, 2:16

            @Maksutov

            +1

          • tolgakaranlik said on 7th July 2011, 9:45

            @Maksutov

            +1 too

          • Icthyes (@icthyes) said on 7th July 2011, 11:21

            Oh come on Maksutov, this thing has been done to death so many times. ‘If I were Senna.’ If. There is no other way to interpret the quote than in the speculative sense. Unless of course you want it to mean something else.

            Oh, but you might say, what about the ‘I know that I am as good as Ayrton Senna was’ quote? Except when you do a google search, you quickly find out that the source of the quote isn’t very reliable at all – an ‘unnamed veteran journalist’ and Sport-Bild. In short, there’s no credibility to it.

            So no, there aren’t ‘numerous occasions’.

        • pking008 said on 7th July 2011, 1:21

          agree 100% especially about the Mansell comments

        • AlonsoWDC said on 7th July 2011, 5:04

          Sorry, Hamilton has shown time and time again that not only does he want to be Senna on the track (and there’s certainly nothing wrong with that) but he wants to be persecuted and looked at as a martyr, even though he’s done so very little to deserve any of those tropes Senna is now (or then) tied with.

        • sebsronnie said on 7th July 2011, 15:04

          Talking of people who seem to dislike Hamilton so much, does any of you follow Dr Vee on Twitter or read his blog?

        • lewymp4 (@lewymp4) said on 7th July 2011, 18:17

          Maksutov, if Lewis had ever said, ” I know that I am as good as Ayton Senna was “, would have caused a meldtown in the motoring racing world and press. Maksutov your so-called quote is a typical example from those who just make things up, or use un-reliable sources to discredit him, ever since he entered the sport. Why haven’t the biggest names in motoracing journalism have not reported on this explosive quote?….do you have any idea why they haven’t Maksutov…..because it never happened!!!

      • Toro Stevo said on 7th July 2011, 1:58

        Senna he is not, nor do I think he thinks he is.

        Although like Senna could, he does play the martyr very well.

        • Valentino said on 7th July 2011, 2:13

          Agree,..
          A martyr (Greek: μάρτυς, mártys, “witness”; stem μάρτυρ-, mártyr-) is somebody who suffers persecution and death for refusing to renounce a belief or cause, usually religious.

          • David BR said on 7th July 2011, 5:23

            Gosh and with those remarkable powers to copy-paste from a dictionary, who could doubt the wisdom of your opinion on anything? Truly Hamilton should give up racing now in the face of your awesome talents.

          • Toro Stevo said on 7th July 2011, 7:01

            Sure, but let’s define everything. Given the many definitions of the verb, I’ll spell out the one I meant.

            play (pl) v.tr.
            4. To pretend to be; mimic the activities of.

      • beneboy (@beneboy) said on 7th July 2011, 13:06

        Everyone loved Ayrton ?

        I’m guessing you never visited France in the late 80s or early 90s :-)

        • Valentino said on 7th July 2011, 17:00

          France hates the rest of the World, and the rest of the World doesn’t care about France, if I may put it that way,.. :D

          • NDINYO (@ndinyo) said on 8th July 2011, 20:00

            You think he thinks he is like Senna; you are the one making him a martyr – basically you are creating things in your mind that do not exist. Try psychoanalyse yourself.

    • Carl said on 7th July 2011, 1:38

      Why is it that reporters or journalists have to go beyond what people actually say? The President of a small nation said: “Please do not put words in my mouth that I did not say. And please do not put thoughts in my head that I haven’t had.”

      If we sum up the quotes unquotes of F1 since2007, why is it that 50% of them or more have LH at their core? No other driver gets as much scrutiny and publicity as he does!

      A Mystery to me.

    • BasCB (@bascb) said on 7th July 2011, 8:17

      Well, I would think that his opinion on what he does or should do will be of more interest to him than that of others in the media.

      • snowman said on 7th July 2011, 9:17

        Hamilton said some where else the only one who’s opinion could effect him about his driving was Senna. I’m sure that is true to a large extinct but he has to appear a bit more humble or nearly everyone is going to start hating him.

        Like how many die hard Mansell fans think lowly of him now? He has also said some less than flattering words about Schumi. Way he is going he is going to have insulted every former champ in last 30 years before he has retired.

        As for the Senna talk this clip below says it all http://www.f1revs.com/2011/06/hamsta-coming-to-cinema-near-you.html

    • mfDB (@mfdb) said on 7th July 2011, 14:42

      Regardless of who he is talking about, I agree with Noelinho here, he says keep your opinions to yourself while giving us his opinion that (if what he says is true) should also be kept to himself….

      In reality, I want to hear the former racers opinions and Hamiltons, but I don’t really like it when people defend themselves by effectively saying ‘shut up’….

    • Antranik (@antranik) said on 7th July 2011, 15:41

      Yeah, its an extremely hypocritical thing to say. I don’t care it it was a misquote and he didn’t mention Villeneuve or Mansell, just saying that people should keep their opinions to themselves is extremely hypocritical, as 1st of all, what he is saying is HIS opinion, 2nd when he says things that makes people hate on him, his excuse is always that “it was just his opinion”.

      Also, +1 to Maksutov

  2. Calum said on 7th July 2011, 0:07

    Can’t be bothered logging on at this early hour, but I’d be up for a special Indy Car blog, I’m getting quite into it just now. Last time I watched my first race with live timing, followed Dario Franchitti lead for hundreds of laps before he just fell out of contention, but it was good, road track next time out though isn’t it?

    • polishboy808 said on 7th July 2011, 0:14

      Yup, its at Edmonton, in Canada. Fun race to watch.

      • Icthyes (@icthyes) said on 7th July 2011, 0:19

        Actually Edmonton is the one after the next one. Edmonton isn’t just a street circuit – it’s at an airport! Not even F1 with its night race and twilight race does that.

        • Icthyes (@icthyes) said on 7th July 2011, 0:22

          I see now that you probably meant “the one after the next one” too! Sorry (said in a Canadian accent)!

        • polishboy808 said on 7th July 2011, 0:24

          Yeah, I got my Canadian races mixed up, sorry. Still, Toronto always has a lot of Chaos, so its also really fun to watch. But yeah, no other race is like Edmonton, it just looks so bizarre seeing them cross over onto the airport runway!

          • DeadManWoking said on 7th July 2011, 2:49

            You never saw the Cleveland GP which was held at Burke Lakefront Airport for 26 years until 2007, and Sebring which hosted the first US GP in 1959 as well as a premier sports car event for 60 years? And of course Silverstone started out as an airport circuit, along with many others post WWII.

        • Prisoner Monkeys said on 7th July 2011, 2:40

          Edmonton isn’t just a street circuit – it’s at an airport! Not even F1 with its night race and twilight race does that.

          Uh, Silverstone is an airfield. Granted, it’s not an active one, but it is an airfield. You can clearly see the runways in aerial photos. It was previously known as RAF Silverstone and used during World War II. When the war was over, it was purchased for use as a racing circuit, like amny other airfields.

          • ajokay (@ajokay) said on 7th July 2011, 8:03

            Silverstone *was* an airfield a few helicopters land there a few times a year, bit it’s been a long time since Silverstone was an airport in the same way that Edmonton still is. And since the redevelopment of Silverstone, it’s even less obvious that it was once an airfield. The one remaining useable runway now has a pit building and paddock on it. Edmonton, however, is very much an airport.

            I’m looking forward to the return of the IndyCars to road courses, I’ve lost track since the race in Brazil, as the ovals don’t interest me as much. I’ll have to do some catching up on Wikipedia.

          • Lee said on 7th July 2011, 8:43

            Edmonton actually uses the airports infrastructure for the track, runways, taxiways etc:

          • Icthyes (@icthyes) said on 7th July 2011, 11:24

            Silverstone’s runway hasn’t been used as part of the circuit since 1948.

          • Johnny 5 said on 7th July 2011, 13:05

            Come Sunday, it will be not just active, but the busiest active airport in Great Britain – as is usually the case on Grand Prix weekends. Trust me – I live under the flightpath!

        • hohum said on 7th July 2011, 14:13

          A bit of a rash remark just before Goodwood.

  3. Manuel said on 7th July 2011, 0:16

    Once again, the press manipulating. He never mentioned Villeneuve and Mansell.His answer was for all the criticism he’s getting. But I’m not surprised at all. Look what’s going on with NOTW.

  4. Icthyes (@icthyes) said on 7th July 2011, 0:17

    Rather strange quote from Hamilton. Can’t really understand why he said it, or what the purpose was.

    • Sam said on 7th July 2011, 0:59

      Misleading headline to say the least. Lewis just responded to a question, never mentioned anybody’s name. Seriously, this guy says ONE thing and groups of people find fault.

      • Keith Collantine (@keithcollantine) said on 7th July 2011, 7:45

        No it’s not, the headline is entirely correct within context. Hamilton was responding to a question about comments made by Jacques Villeneuve and Nigel Mansell.

        • John said on 7th July 2011, 9:01

          If thats the case then wny not show where Hamiton actually mentions Mansell and Villeneuve rather than a vid intimating past racing drivers. its no wonder this story is getting negative posts saying its not correct. If true I think its folly on Hamiltons part to mention Mansell with him being steward at Silverstone this weekend

        • John H said on 7th July 2011, 9:47

          When does the questioner mention Villeneuve and Nigel Mansell? Perhaps Lewis is just talking about the Mansell and Lauda comments. I dunno, but I’m not sure this can be assumed can it?

        • MJ4 said on 7th July 2011, 10:05

          Wasn’t Villeneuve’s opinion rather positive regarding Hamilton? (Basically acknowledging his racing credo.) Or even those with such opinions should keep them to themselves?

        • Paul F said on 7th July 2011, 10:31

          Do you have a quote of the question asked of Lewis? Nowhere does he mention anyone specifically – I had presumed (when first watching this vid & before various news sites went with the Villeneuve & Mansell headlines) that Lewis was referring to journalists.

          • Robbie said on 7th July 2011, 14:15

            I’m not that concerned as to whether LH names JV or NM as people who should keep their opinions to themselves…I’ll take Keith’s word that those drivers names and their opinions were brought up to LH in an interview. The fact remains I did hear/see the video of JV opining on LH, and I agree with JV, and if anything LH should take something from it. JV basically says, I’m paraphrasing, that in a few of the races LH has forgotten to drive with his head which I read into that he has been driving with his heart (ie. letting emotion take over) as he has been frustrated this year, and hasn’t kept concentration on the job at hand at all times. The multiple incidents he has been in recently, sometimes multiple within one race are no doubt the genesis of JV’s thoughts.

            BTW not sure if JV just took it upon himself to make these comments or was he asked and therefore simply answered a question just as LH has done.

            As I say I think LH should heed JV’s words because I think he is exactly right. I think JV also says that if LH used his head more he would be amazing.

            In other words, if LH is actually offended by what JV said then LH does seem to me to have issues.

        • Robbie said on 7th July 2011, 14:40

          I guess it would have helped people on this topic to hear the interviewer’s question in the video clip, not just LH’s response.

          I also think that if it is true as LH says that he doesn’t read this stuff and is only briefed on who has been saying what ahead of interviews such as was taking place, then I don’t know if LH even grasped that JV threw some compliments in there too, and that LH could perhaps take something from that. JV is exactly right in his comments and I’m not sure LH realizes that or just took his handler’s word that it was negative.

          Anyway, LH of all people knows that everyone is entitled to their opinion, he even says that, and I think he also realizes that if people had no opinion on him, or kept their opinions on him to themselves, it would mean he was a non-factor and wouldn’t be nearly as rich and popular as he is.

  5. Noelinho (@noelinho) said on 7th July 2011, 0:26

    Hamilton really needs to knuckle down and let his racing do the talking.

    • David BR said on 7th July 2011, 5:58

      Which is basically what he said in the interview. Though don’t let mere reality spoil your plot line.

  6. Franz said on 7th July 2011, 0:49

    Wow… thank goodness I actually watched the interview before commenting based on the headline. It’s awfully misleading, IMO.

  7. John said on 7th July 2011, 0:54

    @Franz…I agree completley, I cannot find anywhere in any article where Hamilton mentions Mansel or Villeneuve.

  8. Sam said on 7th July 2011, 1:08

    Lewis never mentioned either drivers’ name in the video…I fail to see how your headline, Keith, is representative of the actual content. Yellow Journalism at its finest…and frankly im a bit surprised, owing to the quality of this site.

  9. Prisoner Monkeys said on 7th July 2011, 1:31

    “According to [Bernie] Ecclestone, negotiations for its return are in the final stages. ‘I’m hoping we can make a decision as soon as our lawyers have a good look at them… within the next couple of weeks.’”

    Just so long as it’s not that rubbishy chicane-heacy proposition that was put forward earlier this year.

    • DeadManWoking said on 7th July 2011, 2:30

      Grrr, I had visions of F1 cars flying around Lime Rock Park until I clicked on and read the article. :(

      • Prisoner Monkeys said on 7th July 2011, 2:37

        Well, I don’t know how you got that, because the URL clearly shows that it is a South African website, and the section Keith quoted mentions “a return” – how can Formula 1 return to a place it has never visited?

        Besides, Lime Rock Park is far too short and far too small for Formula 1. It would be worse than a race at Laguna Seca.

  10. Mr.Zing Zang said on 7th July 2011, 2:11

    Bad Journalism Kieth. Hamilton was not responding to Mansel or Villenueve

    • Prisoner Monkeys said on 7th July 2011, 2:23

      You do realise that the round-up is just a collection of articles from other sources that have appeared overnight but are not really big enough to warrant their own article here, right? All Keith is doing is re-posting those links. If an article implies something that isn’t expressly true, it’s the fault of the person who wrote the article and not the guy who re-posted it.

      • David BR said on 7th July 2011, 6:06

        Neither the BBC site nor the interview snippet mention Mansell or Villeneuve, so as far as I can tell it’s not actually a question of reposting.

  11. dpod (@dpod) said on 7th July 2011, 2:18

    Come on guy’s, Keith is just as human as everyone else and mistakes happen. Just be thankful that someone has created such a wonderful website.

    As for Hamilton. I dont think he has to behave or think like he is Senna, he has made a name for himself and will be regarded as a good driver. He does make a ton of pointless comments but thats just the way he is and you cant change that.

    • David BR said on 7th July 2011, 6:12

      True and true. As for the pointless comments, they obviously often come in response to pointless questions! The fact is we only to get to hear Hamilton’s because he’s more newsworthy.

      • leotef (@leotef) said on 7th July 2011, 9:28

        Yeah, pointless answers to pointless questions.. no problem. And agree that all this fuss due to his newsworthy value…
        Funny thing is, still people who hate him gargles around. Let them be.

    • John H said on 7th July 2011, 11:39

      I think a lot of the comments have nothing to do with Keith and his excellent website but rather the general tone towards Hamilton in the press that some fans are getting fed up with.

  12. Prisoner Monkeys said on 7th July 2011, 2:21

    Interesting little twist on News Corp.’s bid to buy the rights to Formula 1. I don’t know if this will directly affect the state of play, but Rupert Murdoch has announced his support for Rebekah Brooks, the current editor of News of the World. For those of you playing at home, NOTW is currently at the centre of a scandal that alleges they hired a private investigator to hack into the phones of murder victims and dead soldiers and delete voicemail messages to create more available space on the phone. I can only imagine that they did this so that more sympathetic phone calls would be left on the phone and the paper would have a better story to run. It’s a big deal because it’s tampering with ongoing investigations and potentially destroying evidence. I’ve heard some 200 or more murder cases – most of them involving children – will need to be reviewed because of NOTW’s actions. It’s so serious that there will be an inquiry into the matter. With Murdoch supporting Brooks, the government has been forced to delay their decision on Murdoch’s proposed takeover of BSkyB. In fact, it would probably delay any decision that gets made related to takeovers and acquisition. Like, say, Formula 1.

    • Luib said on 7th July 2011, 6:07

      I wouldn’t want that crazy rabid Murdoch to get into anything, less so in something I love as F1.

    • David BR said on 7th July 2011, 6:21

      Yes PM but thankfully Rebekah Brooks as chief executive of News Corps will now investigate Rebekah Brooks as editor of NOTW, the metropolitan police will investigate the backhanders to the metropolitan police and the UK government will launch an inquiry into UK government inertia. That’s what I call an accountable system!

      As for Formula 1, well thankfully it’s run by people of the calibre and honesty of Ecclestone, Mosely and Briatore, so no worries there.

    • BasCB (@bascb) said on 7th July 2011, 8:47

      Not to mention, this might well have a big influence on Murdoch taking over the BSky satelite network.

    • Rob said on 7th July 2011, 9:23

      Unfortunately I can’t see this whole hacking issue delaying anything where Murdoch or Sky are involved: David Cameron is totally in Murdoch’s pocket and believes the sun shines out of him. The government have already started saying that the NOTW situation has no bearing on any other part of Murdoch’s activities, so prepare for a nice easy whitewash of the whole thing.

  13. dyslexicbunny said on 7th July 2011, 2:50

    And here i was hoping jenson was going to hand out a bunch of krispy kremes. Drats.

  14. wasiF1 (@wasif1) said on 7th July 2011, 2:57

    Why isn’t Doughnuts allowed in F1 anymore?

    • Toro Stevo said on 7th July 2011, 7:08

      FIA rule I think.

      Probably wouldn’t see it if it were allowed any way. Teams are already worried about cars coming in underweight, they’d have a fit at their driver if half a pound of rubber was left on the track in the victory lap.

    • Keith Collantine (@keithcollantine) said on 7th July 2011, 7:49

      There’s a rule in the Sporting Regulations which discourages drivers from doing victory celebrations – it’s something like “drivers must return to the pits immediately after the race”.

      • SupaSix-1 said on 7th July 2011, 13:16

        The last time I saw any driver doing doughnuts after the race was Lewis Hamilton at Silverstone in 2009 after the chequered flag – He wanted to basically excite and say thanks to his british fans (at the Luffield corner) which was fantastic and it shows how much Lewis adores his loyal fans.

        It says alot about Lewis when he risks getting in trouble with the FIA, stewards and police just so he can give something back his loyal followers – all the other drivers are miserable who usually run off & ignore whenever the fans are close by – unless its a PR moment set up by their teams.

        Im not sure if Lewis got in trouble for it after the race – didnt hear anything about it. But many critisize Lewis for no reason as usual – Does any other driver go so far to appreciate his fans? – Not as far as Ive seen!

        There is footage of it on youtube where one silly idiot sticks 2 fingers up at Lewis as hes coming round but when Lewis comes over to do the doughnuts the guy along with the rest of the fantastic crowd give massive cheers & claps.

        Lewis is the only driver who risks himself getting into trouble just for pleasing his fans – only to him it is worth it.

        Godbless you Lewis Hamilton!

        • sunnyside said on 7th July 2011, 15:46

          “all the other drivers are miserable who usually run off & ignore whenever the fans are close by”

          You’ve seen this right, I mean you must’ve regularly experienced this at Grand Prix to say that, right? And you’re saying this happens most of the time, right? Every driver except LH, every last one except LH has NO time for their fans?

          I don’t buy it.

      • Noelinho (@noelinho) said on 8th July 2011, 23:54

        Yes, it’s also the same rule that prevents drivers from collecting flags to celebrate their wins too. I do think it’s a shame, but I do wonder what the FIA and stewards would do if the rule was repeatedly broken. I expect sanctioning and fines are the only punishments they could really get away with.

        43.3 After receiving the end-of-race signal all cars must proceed on the circuit directly to the post race parc
        fermé without any unnecessary delay, without receiving any object whatsoever and without any assistance
        (except that of the marshals if necessary).

  15. wasiF1 (@wasif1) said on 7th July 2011, 3:02

    I don’t think the move in Mclaren is happening until he & Dennis have a big fight over something.As Mansell said to achieved multiple WC you have to work with the team just as Schumacher did in his era.

    • Boomerang said on 7th July 2011, 12:48

      But it takes maturity, wisdom, experience etc. Lewis is an excellent racing driver but his actions lately, as well as his comments, reflect lack of above mentioned virtues.

      • Boomerang said on 7th July 2011, 12:54

        I have to add that for a long time I haven’t seen comment with so much disrespect. He should be ashamed.
        Nigel worked extremely hard to win his single championship in 1992. No matter how many championships Lewis will win I’ll always rate Nigel’s single championship 10 times of greater value, for good reasons, of course …

1 2 3

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.