Strategic superiority gets Raikkonen and Lotus off to a winning start

2013 Australian Grand Prix reviewPosted on | Author Keith Collantine

Kimi Raikkonen, Lotus, Melbourne, 2013Speaking at this year?s final pre-season test session, Lotus team principal Eric Boullier remarked on how some cars seemed to be better suited for one-lap speed at the expense of pace across a stint, and vice-versa.

Asked if that would place greater emphasis on race strategy he readily agreed, saying it would be very important. That proved prophetic of what unfolded in the first race of 2013, won by his driver Kimi Raikkonen.

Red Bull slip back

The Lotuses claimed the fourth row during the postponed qualifying session which took place on the morning of the race. But the E21?s pace over a race stint proved its strongest suit, and by being one of few drivers to make a two-stop strategy work, Raikkonen claimed an excellent victory.

The Red Bulls seemed to display the opposing traits. Quick in qualifying, but that pace vanished in the race.

Sebastian Vettel had been able to set fastest times seemingly at will on Friday, when the weather was sunny and the track dry. And the disruption and cool conditions of qualifying failed to keep him from pole position.

Start, Melbourne, 2013As the lights went out and Vettel established an immediate two-second lead over his pursuers, it was all looking very 2011. But it didn?t last. Within a couple of laps he had a pair of Ferraris parked on his tail.

The first of these belonged to Felipe Massa, who had looked at least a match for Fernando Alonso all weekend and pipped him in qualifying by a mere three-thousandths of a second.

From fourth and fifth on the grid they each picked off Mark Webber and Lewis Hamilton on lap one, then Massa rebuffed an attack from Alonso at turn 13.

By lap four Vettel, Massa and Alonso were covered by 1.6 seconds. Raikkonen had also appeared behind them in fourth place having gone around the outside of Hamilton at turn 13 on the second lap.

First stops come early

Jenson Button, McLaren, Melbourne, 2013As early as lap seven Vettel was in to discard his super-soft tyres. Massa came in the next time by, then Raikkonen followed Alonso in on lap nine, the quartet keeping the same order.

The Mercedes drivers held on longer. Hamilton, who fallen from third to fifth by lap two, led until he came in on the 12th tour. Rosberg got rid of his super-softs on the next lap.

Now Adrian Sutil was the only driver keeping Vettel from taking his lead back. The returning Force India driver had lined up 12th on the grid and, with Nico Hulkenberg not starting due to a fuel system problem, had been in the advantageous position of being the highest driver on the grid with a free choice of tyres.

He elected to start on the medium compound. His tyres held on to lap 20, while Vettel and the train behind him and applied pressure. Sensing an opportunity, Andrea Stella brought Alonso into the pits for his second stop at the end of lap 19.

Pulling him out of the train turned out to be an inspired move ?ǣ it got Alonso ahead of Vettel and Sutil. And, of course, Massa, who might have wondered why Rob Smedley didn?t pull the same trick for him.

Raikkonen gets ahead

Fernando Alonso, Ferrari, Melbourne, 2013That should have put Alonso on course for victory. But Raikkonen had not joined in the second rush of pit stops triggered by the Ferrari driver. Instead the Lotus covered a 25-lap middle stint on the mediums. As he departed the pit lane for the second time with 24 laps to go, Raikkonen was quite confident he would not be back for a third stop.

Hamilton attempted to do the same as Raikkonen but despite having started his second stint four laps later than the Lotus he ended it three laps sooner.

Alonso appeared on Hamilton?s tail on lap 31. Hamilton clearly had an eye on the big picture, asking his team about the Ferrari drivers? strategy as he bore down on him. But when the pair went side-by-side into turn 13 Hamilton locked his tyres badly.

That forced him to pit early and wrecked his chances of making it to the end without a third stop. It was a double blow for Mercedes – Nico Rosberg had already retired with an electrical problem while running third.

Raikkonen was swiftly back up to second as his rivals pitted and he picked off Sutil with ease. But Alonso hadn’t given up yet – after his third and final pit stop he began cutting into Raikkonen?s lead, bringing it down from 6.5 seconds to 4.

But thereafter the Ferrari?s progress stopped. Alonso’s progress past Sutil was less smooth than Raikkonen?s and he had a near-miss with Charles Pic’s Caterham at one point.

Although Alonso made small gains after that, Raikkonen put the matter beyond doubt in the final five laps. He produced the fastest lap of the race and stretched his advantage over Alonso to 12 seconds.

Vettel dropped back from Alonso at a similar rate over the final laps, the Red Bull nowhere near as kind to its tyres as the Lotus.

Massa took fourth behind him, and a radio message from Smedley at the end of the race gave an insight into the target Massa had set himself pre-race: “Confirmed as not our best circuit but we came here and exceeded what we came here to do. You wanted a couple of points out of it and a clean weekend, we got 12. Good weekend.”

Sutil struggles on super-softs

Adrian Sutil, Force India, Melbourne, 2013Sutil?s late final pit stop ruined his race. The super-soft tyres proved no better later on than they had been earlier. He emerged from the garage behind Massa and was passed by Hamilton and Webber in a single lap as severe graining cost him up to eight seconds on one lap.

Paul di Resta probably would have passed Sutil as well but he was ordered to “hold position”. At such an early stage in the season this was a poor reflection on the team’s faith in its drivers ability to race each other without crashing, especially given Sutil’s restraint in battle earlier.

Webber collected sixth having started second. His hopes of finally finishing on the podium in his home race evaporated, as they often have, within seconds of the start. An engine control unit fault kept him from using KERS for the first 20 laps, and a problem with the front jack on his first pit stop cost him almost three seconds. Both Red Bulls also suffered a loss of car-to-pit telemetry.

Jenson Button ended a miserable weekend for McLaren by salvaging ninth place, which he said was the limit of what the car was capable of. He?d done three laps on the super-soft tyres he qualified on and had to change them after just four laps.

The final point went to Romain Grosjean, who believed his car had developed a problem after finishing over 80 seconds behind his team mate.

Sergio Perez ended his first race for McLaren out of the points with Jean-Eric Vergne in close pursuit. The Toro Rosso driver flat-spotted his tyres trying to pass Button earlier in the race. Team mate Daniel Ricciardo retired with an exhaust fault.

The sole Sauber of Esteban Gutierrez came in 12th ahead of fellow rookie Valtteri Bottas. The Williams driver admitted to making mistakes earlier in the race that cost him positions but at least he reached the chequered flag unlike his team mate, who spun off on lap 25.

Jules Bianchi was 54 seconds adrift of Bottas at the flag, but comfortably clear of Pic’s Caterham. Their team mates were next, Giedo van der Garde the last driver home after suffering a puncture.

Raikkonen’s winning start

Kimi Raikkonen, Lotus, Melbourne, 2013Raikkonen began the second year of his F1 comeback the way he did when he won the world championship in 2007: with a win.

For Boullier, it vindicated the team’s pre-season preparations. Echoing his words during testing he said: “It was exactly what we planned – the strategy was agreed before the race.”

“The car has been designed successfully to save the tyres,” he added. It’s an approach that has clearly paid off, and one that should stand them in good stead for next week’s race in the heat of Malaysia.

2013 Australian Grand Prix

Browse all 2013 Australian Grand Prix articles

Images ?? Lotus/LAT, Red Bull/Getty, McLaren/Hoch Zwei, Ferrari spa/Ercole Colombo, Force India, Lotus/LAT

78 comments on “Strategic superiority gets Raikkonen and Lotus off to a winning start”

  1. 1st!!!!!

    1. I’m also happy that Kimi won.

  2. He was really good today, brilliant and very quick. His consistent lap times were brilliant and the fastest lap at the end was sheer class.

  3. Jules Bianchi was 54 seconds adrift of Bianchi at the flag

    I was unaware that Jules had a relative who was also racing ;)

    1. @raginginferno He was going at 88 mph and racing himself.

      1. hahahaha, brilliant :P

    2. It was his alter-ego.

    3. It was Jules’s brother. Keith has been spending too much time with Montezemolo ;)

    4. Yes, @keithcollantine, there’s a slight slipup there, should be

      Jules Bianchi was 54 seconds adrift of Bianchi Bottas at the flag,

  4. 2 stops is a pretty standard race. The others better start “understanding” the tyres quicksoon.

  5. Lucas Wilson (@full-throttle-f1)
    17th March 2013, 19:06

    Awesome race!

  6. Two things I got clear after watching this race:
    – Massa’s gonna have a hell of a year, considering how he drove today.
    – Considering how far he’s gone last year and the year before with that ill Ferrari, Alonso must be feeling sucess is just round the corner.

    1. Massa is gonna have a decent year and then be replaced by Bianchi.

      1. Ferrari don’t have a history of signing up young drivers straight away though, and if Massa keeps his form up there won’t be a rush to replace him.

        1. He’s older than Vettel was when he clinched the championship in 2010. It’s getting a bit ridiculous, do you now have to be a multiple race winner/champ just to get a Ferrari seat?

          1. I agree that it is a bit silly. It’s already cost them Sergio Perez, could it cost them Bianchi too?

          2. David not Coulthard (@)
            18th March 2013, 9:18

            As Gilles Villeneuve was when he made his debut, or when Hunt was taken by McLaren, the latter unaware of what was going to happen in 1976,

          3. It would only have cost them Perez if they did indeed want Perez, just because you are in a Young Driver Programme it doesn’t guarantee the team want you.

      2. turbotoaster (@)
        17th March 2013, 20:37

        I’ve just had the thought, that if the McLaren is consistently bad this year, Ferrari still have some chance of picking up a certain Sergio Perez…

        1. I can’t imagine why would they? I kept saying last year too, that if Perez was better than Massa, Ferrari would have surely known that and would have signed him accordingly.

      3. @spawinte I doubt it… if Massa keeps himself close to Alonso, he’ll stay…

        1. I think if Massa was consistently near Alonso, he may move to Red Bull to replace a retiring Webber and Ferrari snaps Bianchi under the understanding that even if he is faster then Alonso, he is not challenge/obstruct but to help in their bid for a world championship knowing full well that his time will come after Alonso leaves in/after 2016 or Alonso playing #2 if he insist on staying.

          Binachi is as twice better as Perez will ever be. If Ferrari don’t act fast, they risk losing him to a rival team and that is a recipe for disaster.

      4. The Next Pope
        18th March 2013, 3:53

        I’ve got nothing against Bianchi but… too much. too . much. Bianchi.
        It’s only the first race, and besides he pitted late so he had an impressive final last laps.

        1. David not Coulthard (@)
          18th March 2013, 9:16

          Sutil didn’t.

          But I do agree that this is only the 1st race.

    2. I just can’t avoid the feeling that Massa was held back by Ferrari to allow Alonso better position. They pitted Alonso first and left Massa for too long on a old tires to make sure he comes behind Alonso after the pits.

      1. Massa was thinking of 2-stopper but immediately realized he cannot make it work ,so he compromised his race by hesitating. Also his engineer is not working for Ferrari best interest the same as Nigel Stepheni then did with putting washing poweder into the fuel and later selling Ferrari secrets.

        1. That is an absolutely ridiculous accusation to make of Smedley.

          1. @mike

            I’m not believing that he’s throwing washing powder into Massa’s car, but didn’t you think as well, that when the radio message was played during the broadcast of Smedley telling Massa to stay out with no traffic and “see what he can do” that this was the most ridicolous decision one could make? It’s a shame Felipe himself didn’t see it himself, after losing so much time on Vettel after the first round of stops.

        2. Not a chance! They stole the 2nd place from Massa. They got ridiculous in Ferrari to protect Alonso. Massa was faultless and Alonso struggled many times with his car. We all saw what Ferrari did.

  7. Nice to see Kimi win, his laid back mentality along with his undoubted skill suits this type of game. Shame he didn’t stay with the W.R.C. he did look to be making slow progress.

  8. Those starts, Mark… when are you gonna get round it? KERS always failing in the first 20 laps too… don’t want it to sound suspicious but it’s weird that always always happens…

    1. It’s understandable to look with suspicion, I myself am, these KERS issues are way too frequent to be a coincidence although Vettel does get them occasionally. As for Mark’s starts, again frequency points to me wondering whether he’s actually doing something behind the scenes to resolve these woeful starts, the race can’t be won on the first lap but equally race starts can be foundations of a good race.

    2. It’s not a conspiracy. I’m fairly certain that mark’s kers package is compromised because of his height. If he is still there next year, it should improve because the bulls will have s complete re-design and can accommodate his extra height in their new plans.

    3. Anyone knows whats KERS time worth for a lap?

    4. Svettel and helmut stay up late the night before the race to mess with Marks battery!

      1. David not Coulthard (@)
        18th March 2013, 9:25

        Which would’ve made headlines because Vettel would’ve started from the pitlane?

    5. According to Autosport (, they lost telemetry from Mark’s car before the race even started because of a fault with the ECU (McLaren supplied) which also shut down the KERS. Without telemetry, they don’t know how to set up the clutch for a good start, and the lack of KERS on the run to the first turn makes it even worse.

      1. He looked like he was in 2nd gear (he wasn’t)

      2. David not Coulthard (@)
        18th March 2013, 9:27


    6. I was wondering, if at the start, as the Ferraris roared by Webber wasn’t cursing himself for not making the move to a team that always gets good starts, even it’s #2.

  9. That final picture must be photoshopped… Kimi is SMILING!

    1. He may have gotten to the celebratory beer already.

      1. Did you notice he was more interested in drinking the champagne on the podium than spraying it?

        1. Sensible man Kimi.

        2. It was the first time for him on the podium after his comeback with real champagne!
          Bahrain and Abu Dhabi only served that rose-water (?).

          1. @dennis

            And what about the Spanish, European, German and Belgian Grands Prix?


          2. Right, I fell victim to a wrong call from a TV presenter.
            However, Spa IS quite long ago. Well deserved ‘real’ champagne for Kimi this time.

  10. Just wanted to point out with intrigue that there weren’t any crashes or any incidents from any driver today (correct If i’m wrong. Everyone was clean today and Melbourne is a circuit where drama can be pretty much anticipated, even though there wasn’t much on-track action, so on that note, got to give credence to the drivers for the sensibility.

    1. That’s becuase Keith was there keeping them honest ;)

    2. @younger-hamii technically Maldonado had a couple off’s and Chilton damaged his front wing, not sure how but maybe it was contact on the first few laps ,but yes you are correct that there weren’t really any proper crashes.

    3. An F1F reader put a £1,000 bet that the safety car would come out. Doh.

  11. Last year Eric B. scooped the field all season. I blamed him for not taking to many risk at time but when I think about it now it looks like Lotus worked perfectly. They seams like they have a race of their own not looking at the others. Great team work guys.

    1. I agree in some way. Last year, if Lotus had same approach to strategy as they did here in Australia, they could have had MANY more points last year or even a win.

      So far so good!

      1. David not Coulthard (@)
        18th March 2013, 9:29

        They did win a race, didn’t they?

        1. Yeah they did win once. But I think that they could maybe be even better if they choose to risk. In my humble opinion they didn’t and that’s a smart thing to do looking at long term. Kimi wasn’t frustrated (or he didn’t show it :)) which is opposite to Alonso, Hamilton and Vettel….

  12. I did not expect to read that headline after last year.

  13. Kimi you absolute dark horse!

  14. An awful start to the predictions championship but the best possible start to the season, so happy for Kimi!

  15. Great way to start the season off. I think this will be remembered as a very popular victory in years to come.

    Some good racing and strategy. I think it will be a great year of close racing. Glad that Ferrari are finally looking strong at the first race of the year. Fernando and Andrea played the strategy to a tee, great call..looks like they are pushing hard this year as it was an uncharacteristcally risky move.

    On to Malaysia next…Meds and Hards..will be interesting. Lotus and Ferrari have shown they can play the long game…so lets see how the heat will wreck havock on the tyre wear!

    1. I think they wore faster and harder due to the low temperature the tyres were sliding across the tarmac creating the training effect. Its normally warm in Korea (but then again it doesn’t rain much in Aus either normally!) so I am guessing less wear.

      Guessing though!

      1. It’s graining, not training… and while you are correct that they will eventually be racing in Korea, they aren’t going to be there for another 6 months. Next Grand Prix is Malaysia.

  16. As the cars lined up, one of my thoughts was to wonder how quickly Webber would get off the line. I don’t have the stats at hand, but I’d have to think that over the course of the last few years Webber has lost more positions at the start than any other driver. It’s hard to imagine that technical issues are entirely to blame for his long list of dismal starts. I do like the guy, but I’m becoming convinced that he simply isn’t all that good at it.

    1. @schooner, on the other hand you have to think this is a guy with a long and reasonably successful career in several disciplines of motorsport so it’s hard to believe that he cannot learn how to start.

      1. Its a strange one, isn’t it @hohum. And I don’t remember him having much problems at Williams nor Jaguar before (at Minardi we didn’t get to see him at the start off course unless he would stall or something), and when he was partnered with DC at RBR in the early years there was not much of that either.
        So maybe there really is something in the systems design that makes it extra tough on him, maybe because he is significantly larger (and heavier) than Vettel?

        Strange, although this was more an issue of the ECU, I wouldn’t be surprised to learn Rosberg also had to park it because of something similar.

        1. @bascb, yes, this is the sort of problem that dogs drivers from the land of the rolling start for their first few races but they soon get to be as good as the rest at it.

      2. @HoHum Maybe that was a bit harsh. Webber has certainly earned, and deserves his place as a high salary F1 pilot in a top team. But there is no denying that he has been plagued with a lot of bad starts over the last couple of seasons. I’ll be hoping that he can nail it this weekend!

        1. Me too, and every race thereafter.

  17. Caring tyres wont work next week. Overtaking there is easier and you won’t lose time behind a slower car like Massa and Alonso did behind Vettel. That time gave Kimi the victory. Let’s hope for another exciting GP next week.

    1. Murali Dharan
      18th March 2013, 15:16

      Although unless it rains the lotus will be able to switch on its ties faster than it did now. But in Malaysia it always rains.

  18. At such an early stage in the season this was a poor reflection on the team’s faith in its drivers ability to race each other without crashing, especially given Sutil’s restraint in battle earlier.

    How on earth that move was a “a poor reflection on the team’s faith in its drivers ability to race each other”. I think that was the right decision to be made by any of the team in that situation, because Sutil was struggling with super soft, had Di Resta passed him, it was easy for the following cars too. And I think the team made a right call by making Rista a buffer between Sutil and the P9.

    But would loved to see if that final pit stop was litter delayed. Still I think in the final two laps he was able to get a good pace. And Sutil went on to tell that in Super Soft he was even thinking for a third pit stop.

    1. David not Coulthard (@)
      18th March 2013, 9:34

      had Di Resta passed him, it was easy for the following cars too.

      But what if the other cars are far behind? So far that Sutil was not going to be passed?

  19. Unexpected result! I couldn’t understand how Kimi held down a 10s lead after the first round of pit stops but this helps clear it up, thanks Keith.

  20. Lotus are looking very strong this year.

    But when the pair went side-by-side into turn 13 Hamilton locked his tyres badly. That forced him to pit early and wrecked his chances of making it to the end without a third stop

    I doubt he would ruin his race so carelessly – he was clearly coming in already, radioed his tyres were going off, so slowed Alonso a bit.

    1. I agree.
      The commentators on the TV channel I was watching concluded the same as Keith.
      Not saying it can’t be true, but it just doesn’t add up.
      If it had been mid season 2011, I could have agreed that it was a dumb move/a driver error.
      Not this year, not at that time of the race and not from the position he was in. I just doesn’t add up.

      So I agree he was due to come in a few corners later and he was only trying to slow down Alonso as much as possible.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments are moderated. See the Comment Policy and FAQ for more.