Hamilton: ‘Red Bull have a number one, we don’t’

2013 Malaysian Grand Prix

Lewis Hamilton, Nico Rosberg, Mercedes, Sepang, 2013Lewis Hamilton has hit back at Helmut Marko’s claim that Mercedes operate a system of distinct number one and number two drivers.

“We don’t have a one and two at Mercedes,” said Hamilton. “I have always said, from the moment I was speaking to the team, that I wanted equality.”

“They didn’t offer me to be favoured but I just wanted to make the point that I am not a driver that comes and requests that like a lot of other drivers do.”

Following the Malaysian Grand Prix Marko said the situation at Red Bull was “not like at Mercedes where it?óÔéĽÔäós clear number one and number two, basically we treat the drivers the same”.

During the race Nico Rosberg was repeatedly told not to overtake Hamilton for third place. After the race Hamilton told his team on the radio it “definitely didn?óÔéĽÔäót feel right for me”.

Hamilton added: “Red Bull have a clear one and two, they always have. And that is why they have always had the problems they have had.”

Red Bull said in a statement the fall-out from Sunday’s race is being handled internally:

“It?óÔéĽÔäós worth noting that this is not an entirely new situation for us. At Infiniti Red Bull Racing, we have two drivers who both want to win races and championships and this has been the case since Mark Webber and Sebastian Vettel started driving together in 2009.

“Together, the driver pairing of Mark and Sebastian has achieved 35 wins, 80 podiums, 13 one-two finishes and six FIA Formula One world championships. This successful period includes some spells of intense on-track rivalry between our drivers.

“Each incident has been managed in our own way behind closed doors and this will be no different.”

2013 Malaysian Grand Prix

Browse all 2013 Malaysian Grand Prix articles

Image ?é?® Daimler/Hoch Zwei

Advert | Go Ad-free


160 comments on Hamilton: ‘Red Bull have a number one, we don’t’

1 2 3 4
  1. Joshua Mesh (@joshua-mesh) said on 26th March 2013, 11:28

    Oh Lewis, who are you trying to kid?

    • Call me nieve, but it looks pretty obvious even from the outside that lewis is the type of personality/character that wants genuine results. As an example, look at the likes of Spa 2008 when he gave Kimi the position back (off his own merit without being _told to_ ) after being blocked off at the apex, so that he could retake the position properly? How many drivers can you honestly name who would have done something like that? Thes like of Senna/Schumacher/Vettel and the other “greats” have all pulled disgusting/dishonest/unsporting moves, such as purposely crashing into your rivals to take them out, just to get the result – Hamilton dosnt get half the respect he deserves.

      • Candice said on 26th March 2013, 12:29

        he gave position back because he afraid of being penalized.

        Such move is not necessary if he didn’t cut the corner to begin with.

        if he felts ashamed with it in Mal gp, he should’ve let his faster teammate through. Not saying sorry on the podium LOL.

        • 5150 (@) said on 26th March 2013, 12:51


        • “Such move is not necessary if he didn’t cut the corner to begin with.”

          He was fighting side by side, he ran out of track and had to use the run-off, you know, like Maldonado should have in Valencia?? He knew he’d have to give it back, so he did. Other drivers would wait to be told to give it back.

          “if he felts ashamed with it in Mal gp, he should’ve let his faster teammate through. Not saying sorry on the podium LOL.”

          I think it came out in the press yesterday that he asked if he could let him through but was told to just follow his orders.

          • Matthijs (@matthijs) said on 26th March 2013, 14:38

            He was fighting side by side, he ran out of track and had to use the run-off, you know, like Maldonado should have in Valencia?? He knew he’d have to give it back, so he did. Other drivers would wait to be told to give it back.

            He gave it back because he could have a go the next corner. If he had waited, he would have lost the position. Smart thinking, but nothing to do with honesty. On top of that, it was illegal. Therefore he was rewarded a time penalty.

          • Bernard (@bernard) said on 26th March 2013, 17:24


            It wasn’t illegal, the FIA simply invented an expanded version of the rule after he deservedly won the race – one of the greatest wins of his career – Raikkonen finished by losing the car and binning it against the wall.

        • matt90 (@matt90) said on 26th March 2013, 13:15

          Such move is not necessary if he didn’t cut the corner to begin with.

          Which he had to do to avoid contact as he couldn’t make his car magically disappear.

        • socksolid (@socksolid) said on 26th March 2013, 17:10

          “if he felts ashamed with it in Mal gp, he should’ve let his faster teammate through. Not saying sorry on the podium LOL.”

          To hold positions or not was not his choise and not for him to choose either. That call came from ross brawn and it is to ross decide in which order they finish – not lewis. Lewis can say sorry on the podium but the situation is probably not even his fault.

        • MagillaGorilla (@magillagorilla) said on 26th March 2013, 17:45

          Not sure if you know what team orders are or how they work, both drivers were ordered to hold position, both told by their boss to do something. Thus they do it, do you think (Candice) that they should be left to their own devices that their boss wont be mad or give some backlash to them? So it isn’t as simple as giving up a spot if he was told not to. Do you dislike Lewis I wonder…wouldn’t be surprised if you did.

      • Kobayashi24 (@kobayashi24) said on 26th March 2013, 18:34

        If you haven’t noticed by now, everything Hamilton says is to boost his public image. Unfortunately, many of the things he says and does contradicts the image he is trying to portray. This is just another example. Here, Hamilton is trying to say he has and will beat his teammate in an equal car. If he went to Red Bull and won, he would not have beaten his teammate fairly. H.A.M. for you.

      • @N

        There is no doubt that Lewis is a great driver, one of the best of his generation.. but he is no better than Vettel or Alonso ( the most targeted drivers for being so called number 1 drivers at their respective teams) when it comes to honesty… Remember Australia 2009, he was disqualified for lying to stewards…

        • Lewis was interviewed immediatly after he got out the car and his version of events to the media was correct and matched with what we saw and heard on TV, it was only when he got back with the team and then went to the enquiry that their story changed, why do you think that was? Hamiltons wrong doing that day was allowing his team to take control of that matter and just going along with their version of events. And it was evident in the press afterwards that Lewis was entirly ashamed of that.

          I think there is definatly somthing different about Lewis than his peers, and it isnt just racing skills.

          • @N
            |”Hamiltons wrong doing that day was allowing his team to take |control of that matter and just going along with their version of |events.”

            That still is a lie.. is nt it?

            I know you are not gonna agree, so let’s agree to disagree with each other…

            By the way I love watching Hamilton drive , it’s just that I don’t agree with people who try to portray him as a saint..

          • No i do agree, it is a lie, and no-one is a saint, but i do think there is a distinction to be made between the likes of Sennas actions in Suzuka, Schumachers in Jerez, Vettels actions in Malaysia, and Lewis’ in Aus.

            You can’t just lumber everyone who has some wrong-doing all into the same box. Each situation is different with its own sets of facts/intentions

            And then theres wether the drivers actually regretted what they did to get the result, did Senna/Schumacher/Vettel seem actually bothered by what they did?, even taking into account its severity? I dont think one bit. Did Lewis seem genuinly gutted about what had happend both in Aus and Malaysia? i would say yes. So back to my point, i think hes different than his peers, i think he only wants to win under proper circumstances, because at the end of the day when hes alone, only he knows wether he truly deserves his results/reputation.

    • Oh Lewis, please keep your mouth shut for once. Then you just might get some great seasons and maybe win a WDC. When Hamilton went to Mercedes a lot of the pressure he’s been living with at McLaren for years disappeared. He should have kept it that way as he has struggled when the pressure was on in the past. Instead he’s running his mouth constantly and piling pressure onto himself again. Makes me wonder if this is Hamiltons own doing or a PR-stunt by his so called managers. All I know is that Lewis is going to be under a lot of pressure and will have a tough time handling it if Mercedes fail being competitive in developing the Mercedes this year. Expectations have been created by Hamilton and nobody else. Sometimes silence is gold..

      • Bernard (@bernard) said on 27th March 2013, 18:59


        All I know is that Lewis is going to be under a lot of pressure and will have a tough time handling it if Mercedes fail being competitive in developing the Mercedes this year

        Really? And you know this how exactly? Formula One is no walk in the park for any driver, or any employee in any team for that matter.

  2. Magnificent Geoffrey (@magnificent-geoffrey) said on 26th March 2013, 11:28

    This is like a playground.

    “You have a number one driver policy!”

    “No, YOU have a number one driver policy”

    “Do not!”

    “Do too!”

  3. Thomas (@infi24r) said on 26th March 2013, 11:29

    This is obviously the truth. Red Bull have shown over and over again that Webber is the #2 driver at that team. Good comeback by Lewis.

    • Roberto (@roberto) said on 26th March 2013, 13:16

      Why wouldn’t he be. I think it’s fair time for RBR to just admit to it and get on with it.. He’s got 3 world titles for gods sakes. It’s not 2009 anymore where both drivers were on equal grounds.. Webber had his chance in 2010 and blew it.. since then he’s been consistently outperformed by Vettel and I think it’s only fair for Vettel to get that number one spot now. Horner should’ve discussed this with Webber before he signed the contract. If he’s unhappy, feel free to leave and try your luck elsewhere. Not like RBR will have trouble filling the seat.

    • Alex (@smallvizier) said on 26th March 2013, 18:55

      It’s not a good comeback when it’s contradicted by the evidence.

      Last weekend, Red Bull ordered Vettel to hold position behind Webber. This is evidence that they cared about getting both cars home more than they cared about Vettel’s points tally. This suggests that either

      (i) Red Bull do not have a #1 driver policy; or
      (ii) They do and the #1 is Webber.

      (on the other hand Mercedes’ orders tell us nothing conclusive as Hamilton was already in front.)

    • MNM101 (@mnm101) said on 26th March 2013, 22:06

      I was contemplating this whole situation and I came up with something, let’s call it a possible outcome, however slim the chance… This might be exactly what Red Bull needed, for 4 years now there has been this long exhausting back and forth between the team and the world, the team and the drivers, and the drivers themselves, is there a N.1 ? isn’t there ? is one given the advantage over the other. and frankly it’s tedious. Mark has been outperformed by Seb for the last three years, so naturally Seb has become the go-to guy as he is the one who guarantees results, but the team maintains that both drivers get equal chance, and Malaysia proved it(with Mark being guaranteed victory after the final stop).
      Although, when Seb was attacking, the way he was warned suggested they tried not to “step on his toes” too much, which(at least to me) does not imply favoritism, but implies they don’t want to upset him, which is wrong, any and every driver must listen to what his team orders him to do, he owes it to the 400-700 people who are behind the scenes.
      So I think this might just solve the problem, the reaction Seb received after the race was clearly a huge shock for him, and probably was very humbling for him, which will do him some good, although he usually is a humble guy.
      As for Mark I think now he can stop talking about the protection and preferential treatment Seb gets.
      So who knows, this might be the last straw, that will make everyone sit down together, lay everything on the table and come out stronger than before.
      And it just might destroy the team :P
      I’ll just add what I think of how things went down on Sunday, Sebastian is my favorite driver, and I think he was in the wrong, but ONLY towards the team, After Mark’s history with team orders, I think he had this one coming .

  4. MB (@muralibhats) said on 26th March 2013, 11:30

    These war of words, intended to diminish all the talks on team orders that were not executed in the right manner?

  5. James (@iamjamm) said on 26th March 2013, 11:38

    I did have to laugh when Helmut made those comments post-race. Whether anyone does or doesn’t have a ‘number one driver’ policy, doesn’t really bother me. But, I’m more inclined to believe Hamilton on this than Helmut ‘Sebastian is the son I wish I’d had’ Marko.

    • BasCB (@bascb) said on 26th March 2013, 12:38

      I must say I admired how quick he was able to point to another team “having it even worse” then themselves there!

      As for no. 1 status – inside Mercedes – time will tell us. But its clear that Webber has been no.2 all the way since mid 2009 because Vettel showed what he can do when given the right car.

      • JCost (@jcost) said on 26th March 2013, 15:12


        Lewis was very uncomfortable last Sunday and his words sounded honest. However, he might dislike it but I think in Ross Brawn’s head Mr. Hamilton is driver #1, time will tell whether it’s true or not, but if it looks like a duck…

        P.S.: David Coulthard was speculating that Ross Brawn and his peers felt that underfueled car was their fault and Hamilton should not pay for that, who knows.

        • BasCB (@bascb) said on 26th March 2013, 15:32

          Yes, I can understand the feeling about the underfuelled car. But as pointed out by someone else, when they underfuelled Nico a couple of seasons back, they had no qualms in having Schumi pass him.

    • mnmracer (@mnmracer) said on 26th March 2013, 12:41

      So you see Red Bull give two teamorders today AGAINST Vettel, you see Red Bull getting ****** off at Vettel, and you conclude: wow, they must really like Vettel.


      • John H (@john-h) said on 26th March 2013, 13:11

        That much is true, but Webber’s post-race “protection” comments can’t exactly just be ignored can they? That to me reveals much more than the Malaysia team orders.

        • Roberto (@roberto) said on 26th March 2013, 13:32

          All it reveals for me is that he’s looking for excuses as to why his teammate has 3 world titles and he doesn’t. He can’t stomach the fact Vettel is better then him and it’s eating him up inside, so he’s playing the only card he’s got left..

          • Ryan (@ryanisjones) said on 26th March 2013, 14:57

            Well if Vettel is sooo much better, why did the team get Mark to slow down so he could pass? Surely his team mate could have just caught up and passed. Oh wait, he couldn’t. Was it a 5 second lead Mark pulled out?

          • @roberto – You are right in a way.. He did mention that his reaction was not just because of what happened at the race, but many things were going in his mind in the last 13 or 15 laps..

          • MagillaGorilla (@magillagorilla) said on 26th March 2013, 18:00

            @roberto …sure, that’s what he is doing. Stick to making it simple and remove your tin foil hat. Webber thought they would both cruise home in position, it didn’t happen and like any human he got emotional about the situation. Vettel is protected. The facts show that 2009 and 2010 vettel wasn’t that much better than Webber, the 2011 and 2012 car were said to fit Seb better and if so that might explain the smash. If this car which is the evo of their RB7 and RB8 then we might see the same distance through the season.

          • F1fanNL (@) said on 26th March 2013, 22:27


            He didn’t pull out anything. After the first pitstops Vettel closed the gap from 4+ seconds to under two seconds. In the third stint Vettel got on Webber’s gearbox and ushered the team to tell Webber to get a move on. In the fourth stint he overtook Hamilton AND closed in on Webber again. After the last pitstops Webber’s entire ‘lead’ was gone.

            Webber got into the leading position because of the team. The team told him to stay out because they realized they had made a mistake with Vettel’s pitstop. If Webber had been genuinely faster we wouldn’t be discussing in the first place.

            The facts show that 2009 and 2010 vettel wasn’t that much better than Webber

            Except that he was. If not for the rookie mistakes in 2009, Vettel would have been a 4 times World Champion now. In qualifying and pace Vettel had Webber covered from the word go.
            And more mistakes and about 70 points down the drain because of reliability issues still didn’t allow Webber to beat Vettel in 2010. Without the reliability issues Vettel would have made 2010 look like 2011.

            For 2009 Webber could use the excuse of his bike accident. For 2010 and 2011 he used the blown diffuser and tyres excuse. I can’t remember what excuses he used in 2012 but I’m betting he used one or two last year as well. And now its ‘Vettel is protected’… Sigh…

            He’s been beaten 5 years in a row and Vettel will most definitely beat him for a 6th year in a row. Now I don’t know about you but I’m beginning to see a pattern here.

          • Ryan (@ryanisjones) said on 28th March 2013, 11:11


            He didn’t pull out anything. After the first pitstops Vettel closed the gap from 4+ seconds to under two seconds. In the third stint Vettel got on Webber’s gearbox and ushered the team to tell Webber to get a move on.

            Sorry mate, but I don’t know what race you’re talking about. Here is the link to the lap charts on this site. http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2013/03/24/2013-malaysian-grand-prix-lap-charts/

            Select Webber and Vettel only to see it clearer. Firstly Webber overtook Vettel on track before he pitted (Webber was faster). On the third stint where Vettel complains about Webber being slow, Webber then pulls away from Vettel – Webber’s fastest time in this stint is a 101.01, Vettels is 101.25 (Webber is faster). On lap 41 Vettel is 4.25 seconds behind Webber. He makes up all of his time on the in lap and out lap of his pit stop.

            I don’t care much about the past, but on this day, Vettel could not have won the race unless Webber had slowed down. Fact.

        • The protection comment doesn’t tell us anything. Of course Vettel has protection within Red Bull. He’s won 3 WDC’s and 3 WCC’s for Red Bull. I don’t think any of us have any idea about what this has meant to Red Bull financially and in terms of image. There’s no way Red Bull is going to risk alienate Vettel. Before that happens they’ll rather throw Mark under a train. That’s just common business sense.

  6. Lucas Wilson (@full-throttle-f1) said on 26th March 2013, 11:48

    It is very different at Ferrari, where when Alonso enters the garage, all the strategists, teams members, Stefano and Massa bow down before him and kiss his finger :-)

  7. Girts (@girts) said on 26th March 2013, 11:50

    For sure, Red Bull have a number one and his name is Fernando Alonso. Red Bull’s refusal to favour one of their own drivers over another has helped Alonso gain many extra points since the beginning of 2010, unfortunately he has failed to win a world championship during this time anyway.

  8. Traverse (@) said on 26th March 2013, 11:55

    Bruce Buffer: “In the blue corner, RBR’s Helmut Marko!!…And in the red corner, Mercs Lewis Hamilton!!”.
    Both fighters glare at each other with a steeliness only Superman could match.
    Ham: “HELL YEAH!!”
    Helmut: ” I WAS BORN READY!!”
    Referee: “FIGHT!!!!”

    • David not Coulthard (@) said on 26th March 2013, 15:40

      Montezemolo:I thought I was the one who was going to fight Helmut, what happened?

  9. Hamilfan (@hamilfan) said on 26th March 2013, 12:05

    ding ding ding ding ….round two :P

  10. Mareks said on 26th March 2013, 12:08

    What is the most important thing is to understand that Rosberg was always just No.2 driver in Mercedes team. Remember 2011 Belgium GP? Rosberg was told to save fuel just a few laps before the finish, still Schumacher was allowed to overtake Rosberg. Schumacher finished 5th and Rosberg was 6th. Besides, Mercedes didn’t protest the dirty trick from Schumacher – asking for the odd number (No.1 driver in each top team has an odd number on his car) that belonged to Rosberg for each of the 3 seasons. And each of these 3 times Schumacher was allowed “to rob” Rosberg. Shame!

    • John H (@john-h) said on 26th March 2013, 13:18

      If all this is true, tell me why is Rosberg now in car number 9?

      • F1_Americana (@f1americana) said on 26th March 2013, 18:35

        Uh, because Schumi has retired, and the lower number generally goes to the driver who has been with the team longest. See McLaren 2013, Ferrari 2010, etc. When the team has an entirely new lineup, they usually go with who has been in F1 (or achieved the most) the longest (McLaren 2007). As for the rest of what Mareks said, yes, Schumi did ask for the lower number, but Rosberg agreed. Rosberg is not as superstitious as MS was about what number is painted on his car.

      • Mareks said on 28th March 2013, 15:27

        I believe, it’s because Hamilton is not like Schumacher, who complained about his team mates for even the smallest detail. Remember 1995 season when Schumacher was scared of Herbert’s pace and Schumacher ran to Briatore to complain about Herbert. Herbert: “The trouble all started after I qualified fourth in the first race in Brazil. Then we went on to Argentina, where I was quicker than him in the first session. That night he told the team that he didn’t want me to see his data any more. The next morning he came over to me and said, ‘I’m sure you accept you’ll have secrets from me and I’ll have some from you so you’ll understand if I don’t show you my data in future’. But, of course, he still had access to all of my data. What could I do about it? Nothing. I had no say in the matter.” Hamilton is not whining like Schumacher.

    • Todfod (@todfod) said on 27th March 2013, 12:01

      It was true that Rosberg started his stint at Mercedes as the #2 driver.. but after he took Schumi to school in the 2010 season, they were on equal footing 2011 onwards.

      To be honest, Brawn didn’t expect Schumacher to be so poor on his comeback.. so they probably felt like they lacked one outstanding driver (secret team #1 driver i guess). So in comes Lewis for 2013… and Ross probably looks at Lewis as the guy who can deliver the championship.

      But then again.. this all depends on how Lewis fares against Rosberg. If Nico starts beating Lewis.. it will be back to fair game between both their drivers.. but if Lewis beats Rosberg convincingly over the next 6-7 races.. I expect Lewis to become #1 . Ross brawn has always preferred hedging his bets on one driver instead of two.. but then again that driver has always been significantly better as well.

      Pure speculation I guess… but this is just my theory

  11. Hamilfan (@hamilfan) said on 26th March 2013, 12:12

    I was disgusted by Marko . I know that the move by merc was distasteful and despite being a hamilton fan my blood was boiling when Nico was coasting behind him , I can’t imagine how bad it was for Nico in the cockpit . But I find that some of the kindergarten kids have better maturity than Helmut who is waiting for taking a dig at someone . I don’t know how one can get along with his tantrums especially a team so successful as Red Bull . I think these teams need some guys who are eccentric to handle eccentric people and the media . Now , the better move by the mercedes camp woul be to deal with this eccentric guy by using their own eccentric guy , ala Lauda.

    • petebaldwin (@petebaldwin) said on 26th March 2013, 12:19

      I can’t believe all the effort and money Red Bull put into PR and Marketing, and then they let Marko speak to the press… Absolutely bonkers!

      Red Bull are in F1 to push their brand and whilst I appreciate that winning Championships is good for the Red Bull name, having the least popular driver on the grid and Helmut Marko making an idiot of himself every couple of months surely can’t be good!

      • Lucas Wilson (@full-throttle-f1) said on 26th March 2013, 12:38

        Go Mercedes! :-)

      • MazdaChris (@mazdachris) said on 26th March 2013, 12:39

        Any successful driver is going to be unpopular. It’s just a fact of competition. Look at Alonso, Hamilton, Schumacher, and there are plenty of others. Any driver good enough to score dominant wins is inevitably vilified while they’re successful.

        • Traverse (@) said on 26th March 2013, 13:08

          You could expand that to other sports aswell. Man U, Floyd Mayweather, Anderson Silva, GSP, Jon Jones, Venus and Serena Williams, Sebastien Loeb, Djokovic etc…

        • HoHum (@hohum) said on 26th March 2013, 14:45

          Never heard a bad word said about Jimmy Clark.

          • Traverse (@) said on 26th March 2013, 17:55

            That’s because he died prematurely. If Senna was still alive today, I’m not convince that people would admire him as much as they currently do. As with all that die young, people view the deceased’s life through rose tinted specs (Kurt Cobain, James Dean etc..).

            Prior to Senna’s death, people would’ve felt comfortable criticising and labelling him a dangerous and reckless driver that should’ve been thrown out of the sport after he purposefully crashed into Prost at Suzuka. After his death I guess people feel an obligation not to speak ill of him, even if he deserves the criticism.

            Maybe the same applies to Jim Clark, and nobody daren’t speak ill of him…For he who doth utter negative sentiments upon his memory, shall be DOOMED FOREVER!! MUHAHAHA!!!

        • petebaldwin (@petebaldwin) said on 26th March 2013, 16:00

          See it’s different though. Alonso has always been very marketable as is Hamilton. Companies want those 2 on their products. I’ve not heard them booed on the podium although I may be wrong (??) and in general, they seem to command respect regardless of whether you like them or not. It’s just not the same with Vettel. 3 Championships in and people still talk about how he’s not a world class driver…

  12. MazdaChris (@mazdachris) said on 26th March 2013, 12:20

    If Vettel is Red Bull’s #1 driver, why was the team order for Vettel not to overtake Webber, rather than the order being for Webber to move over and let Vettel pass him? It seems a slightly unusual tactic to tell your #1 driver not to win a race, no?

    Anyway, I think the best way to fix this situation is for Vettel and Webber to appear together in an hilariously misjudged commercial for Infiniti cars, portraying their animosity as a kind of playful rivalry. Y’know, all smiles and twee music, while behind the scenes their relationship deteriorates irreparably, dragging the team into complete meltdown and costing Red Bull an almost guaranteed double championship.

    Ooh, I think I just spotted a glitch in the Matrix…

    • BasCB (@bascb) said on 26th March 2013, 12:41

      You think Vettel (or Webber) could find some secret materials and hand them to Jean Todt this year …

      • MazdaChris (@mazdachris) said on 26th March 2013, 12:45

        I’m sure there’s plenty of dirt to be dug there. Flexible wings, engine maps, trick diffusers, I’m sure there’s something somewhere that could be used to sabotage the team.

        Although good luck with Jean Todt; he’s no Mosley is he. He’d just give a Gallic shrug and be all “you sink zis is bad? You should ‘av zin what ve did at Ferrari!” and walk away chuckling to himself.


    • @mazdachris The truth of the matter is that if Vettel wasn’t #1 driver,he wouldn’t give himself the freedom to ignore the team order.It’s not that the team made Vettel #1,it’s more like he put himself in that position by outclassing Webber so convincingly,and winning tree titles for the team.Basically team doesn’t really care who finished first,as long as they both finish,it’s 43 points eider way.There are times when team just can’t give equal treatment to the drivers,like when there is just one peace of upgrade,or a title decider,obviously than the team will favor its best shot,which in this case is Vettel,all the teams do that.The fact is that Vettel can do just about anything he wants,he can get away with a murder basically,as long as he delivers like he does,and he knows it.Besides what can RBR do,fire him,don’t think so.And if they somehow magically did that,and they won’t,it’s not like he would be in a problem of finding a top team for himself.RBR and Vettel are a perfect fit,and he is and will remain the clear #1 as long as he delivers,end of story.

      • MazdaChris (@mazdachris) said on 26th March 2013, 13:17

        @kimster381 No I agree in that respect. I’ve maintained that Red Bull has (friction aside) a virtually perfect driver line up – a top level driver leading the team, and a teammate who is solid enough to regularly score high points but not to take points off of the lead driver. But this isn’t quite the same as Vettel being defacto #1 – what people talk about there, is that Red Bull themselves would favour Vettel in any given situation. So he’d receive preferential treatment. What this whole episode has proven is that Red Bull definitely don’t have a designated number 1, and that the performance that Vettel has put in has been entirely of his own making.

        The fact that Vettel disobeyed the team is a separate issue, and one which the team needs to decide how they want to address. He’s an amazing driver, but it’s not like there aren’t other amazing drivers out there, most of which would step over their own mothers to get a seat in a Red Bull. He’s not irreplaceable, and being good doesn’t mean that you get to behave exactly as you please. Personally, I’m glad he did disobey the order, because I like to see him racing and I admire his racing spirit. But when your boss tells you to do something, you are contractually obligated to do what you’re told, rather than putting your own interests above those of the team.

        How they address this is an almost impossible problem. If they punish him, it harms them. If they don’t, it sends out a message that Vettel is effectively the boss at Red Bull and he can make the calls on team orders whenever he likes. As Flavio Briatore says, you can’t have the team principle sat in one of the racing cars.

        • @mazdachris Not only is it not impossible,it’s not even a problem,and they won’t punish him at all.It will end with Webber leaving the team during the season or strength after the season end.In fact Webber is the one that isn’t irreplaceable in this story,and like you said “it’s not like there aren’t other amazing drivers out there, most of which would step over their own mothers to get a seat in a Red Bull”.Like i said RBR and Vettel are a perfect fit,and they have the titles to prove it.

          • MazdaChris (@mazdachris) said on 26th March 2013, 13:55

            Yep, a perfect fit, but the fact remains that they need to know that when they tell Vettel to do something (or not do something) then he’ll do as instructed and not just choose to ignore them. As great a driver as he is, he’s still an employee of the team and he needs to understand that the team comes first. Even Ferrari have always had that policy – team before driver. When driver ambition and team ambition is aligned, then great, but when there is conflict the driver has to do what he’s told, regardless.

            If they’re not to punish him, then they must effectively make him literally the number 1 driver, and only impose team orders which benefit Vettel. Because having a driver ignore what he’s told and constantly do his own thing makes them look extremely weak.

          • Sankalp Sharma (@sankalp88) said on 26th March 2013, 14:42

            ” when driver ambiton and team ambition are aligned “.

            How did Vettel violate this rule. The team would have still gotten 43 points. And let’s face it the guy with the better chance of fighting for the WDC won.

          • Minardi (@gitanes) said on 26th March 2013, 16:48

            Yes Vettel has 40 points now instead of 33, but what are the chances now of a collision between the two of them later this year? I’d say they went up a tad. And the “get him out of the way” comment on the radio will forever paint him as a spoiled brat in my opinion. Incredible that I used to like him actually.

          • @sankalp88 Vettel violated the rule by racing and overtaking, at a point when RBR had a comfortable lead. We all know how RBR suffered with its tyres in Australia, hence the team did not want to take chances in racing and damaging their tires which might have resulted in losing some of the 43 points…

          • F1_Americana (@f1americana) said on 26th March 2013, 18:45

            There’s no way Mark Webber quits Red Bull mid-season. He’s not the kind of guy who’ll quit anything mid-way. It’s not in his DNA. He’ll have a good long think these 3 weeks, but he’s no quitter.

        • Sankalp Sharma (@sankalp88) said on 27th March 2013, 0:02


          “We all know how RBR suffered with its tyres in Australia, hence the team did not want to take chances in racing and damaging their tires which might have resulted in losing some of the 43 points”

          Common, how many times are we going to go over this. The Mercs were already 7+ seconds behind by them, when Vettel made his move. Even an increase in wear rate would not have damaged RB’s 1-2 given that Hamilton was basically crawling. The only danger in which the ’43 points’ were, was from Webber’s aggressive defending. Which by the way I had no problem with. (It was great racing from Webber). I was just addressing @MazdaChris ‘ point about team ambition and driver ambition. I strongly believe what Vettel did was in line with his ambiiton and the team’s ambition. I’m certain Horner won’t counter this assertion one bit, although he would of course deny it in the media. A result which would have been the other way around (WEB – VET), could have hurt RB in the long run. Let’s face it Webber unlike Vettel won’t be challenging for the WDC. It makes more sense that the guy who genuinely has a chance of securing the title be ahead of a teammate who shows brilliance in patches.

  13. Ben (@scuderia29) said on 26th March 2013, 12:27

    oh so what if they do or they dont! why he’s even bothering to respond to helmut markos comment i dont know.

  14. Dan (@esquilax) said on 26th March 2013, 12:45

    I can’t believe it but I’m actually becoming a fan of Lewis Hamilton. And I’m starting to think if it wasn’t for his legion of fanboy followers I would have been a fan long ago. Comments I’ve seen about Lewis “thrashing” Alonso in his first season and such nonsense was what kept me from liking him, but I guess every driver has their supporters and you have to see past that. Being a Ferrari fan since the 90s I’ve even come to like Alonso, which is something I couldn’t have said 5 or 6 years ago.

    But when I actually think about it, Hamilton is one of my favourite drivers to watch, always exiting, his quali laps can be something to behold at times, and he races hard, yet clean and fair. Obviously at times he has trouble keeping his emotions in check and I don’t think he’ll ever be the wisest man around, but I chose to believe what he said about his podium on Sunday. Imagine what a relief it must have been for him to see that his decision to move wasn’t so bad after all and they have a chance at building a winning team, you’d have thought it would have been one of his most thoroughly satifying podiums. Lewis is no actor, and if he truly believes in achieving results in the right way, then I applaud him. Heck I might even cheer for him!

  15. Jason (@jason12) said on 26th March 2013, 12:49

    Marko made a false statement, Lewis corrected it.
    Silence could mean consent.

1 2 3 4

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.