Rate the race: 2013 Monaco Grand Prix

2013 Monaco Grand Prix

Fernando Alonso, Ferrari, Monte-Carlo, 2013What did you think of the today’s race? Share your verdict on the Monaco Grand Prix.

F1 Fanatic holds polls on each race to find out which fans thought of every race during the season.

Please vote based on how entertaining and exciting you thought the race was, not on how your preferred driver or team performed.

Rate the race out of ten and leave a comment below:

Rate the 2013 Monaco Grand Prix out of ten

  • 1 (6%)
  • 2 (3%)
  • 3 (5%)
  • 4 (8%)
  • 5 (10%)
  • 6 (15%)
  • 7 (22%)
  • 8 (19%)
  • 9 (9%)
  • 10 (3%)

Total Voters: 759

Loading ... Loading ...

1 = ‘Terrible’, 10 = ‘Perfect’

You need an F1 Fanatic account to vote. Register an account here or read more about registering here.

See the results for past seasons here:

2013 Monaco Grand Prix

Browse all 2013 Monaco Grand Prix articles

Image ?é?® Ferrari/Ercole Colombo

Advert | Go Ad-free

287 comments on Rate the race: 2013 Monaco Grand Prix

1 6 7 8
  1. Alexandre (@vzx7qf) said on 27th May 2013, 11:12

    A race track where almost the driver stays in the same place where they start is not a good race track. I also like all the glamour surrounding Monaco but at the top of all I like watching a race with several maneuvers and real overtaking opportunities and Monaco do not have anything of that. If I could, I eliminate Monaco from the calendar. F1 had pit-stops, but if you had watch World Series 3.5 before de F1 race, where there weren’t pit-stops, all the drivers’ stays in the same place from first to last lap (44 minutes). This is not racing and I do not want to see scenes like that (Monaco races are very boring). I rated with a 1.

  2. avl0 said on 27th May 2013, 14:07

    worst race i think i have ever witnessed, a couple of clumsy overtakes aside the whole thing was a slow moving procession, i felt embarrassed for martin and crofty trying to find some kind of interest.

    Race was summed up by radio calls to the two merc drivers around lap 20-25 when being told precisely to what pace to drive and even others being told what gears to use where, I mean why even bother having racing drivers in the first place if you make them drive several seconds off the pace. They were going so slowly at the front that when they did push for a lap or two they were 5 seconds faster. They were so slow that even the caterhams and marussias could keep up with the train, just a shocking ‘race’.

    I’ll give the weekend as a whole a 3 purely because qualifying was good, although that too seemed determined by who can both turn on and keep the tyres in for ONE WHOLE LAP :O

  3. David not Coulthard (@) said on 28th May 2013, 15:44

    9/10
    I love the lack of DRS influence. And the Monaco “processionalism” is something that every season needs – just not nearly as often as Canada 2011 (or, ironically, Monaco 1970).

    And Perez’ overtake on Button….was great.

  4. I rated it 3 which is probably a bit too positive compared to what a 10 would be like. The track is so unsuitable for modern Formula 1 cars that Nico was able stay in front even though his race engineer was designing his pace throughout the race. What is the point if any? For one it provides a boring “show” and secondly it is sad and discriminating to see the great sport reduced this: “OK Nico, now you can start to pick up your pace a little.”

    I’m with good old DC all the way: “It’s rubbish!”

  5. PJA (@pja) said on 30th May 2013, 18:22

    I only gave the race a 5 as I found it rather dull, there were a few moments of excitement which stopped me from giving it a lower score. It wasn’t helped by all the drivers driving so far below their limits.

    I only saw the BBC highlights show but even that seemed like a procession so watching the whole thing must have been worse.

1 6 7 8

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.