Ferrari put two roosters in their hen house

2014 F1 season

Fernando Alonso, Kimi Raikkonen, Melbourne, 2012Ferrari’s 2014 driver line-up of Kimi Raikkonen and Fernando Alonso will be the first time in 60 years they have fielded two world champions.

The team’s long standing preference for having clear ‘number one’ and ‘number two’ drivers explains why F1’s oldest outfit hasn’t paired two world champions since they turned up at Monza in 1953 with half-a-dozen entries including Alberto Ascari and Giuseppe Farina.

Even as recently as last year, president Luca di Montezemolo insisted “I don?t want to have two roosters in the same hen house”.

Montezemolo was referring to rumours that Sebastian Vettel might join Fernando Alonso at the team. But in rehiring Raikkonen – a world champion and winner of 20 grands prix – they have now done exactly that.

The need to get the best

As argued here previously, the move makes sense for Ferrari. The 2010 points system change made life harder for teams who don’t pick the two best drivers available to them.

This year’s championship contest has underlined that point. For the third year in a row, Massa has thus far failed to score as much as half of Alonso’s points tally. Meanwhile Ferrari find themselves under pressure from Mercedes who have a pair of race-winning drivers.

It’s not just the points system which impels Ferrari to increase the quality of their driver partnership. Car performance between the top teams has converged in recent years, making it imperative for teams to ensure both drivers are getting the most out of their equipment.

This wasn’t the case a decade ago. In the early 2000s Ferrari could count on building a car that would take pole position by a second and win by a minute. Therefore they could afford to partner Michael Schumacher with someone who wasn’t going to get anywhere near him.

The rules have tightened so sharply since then that no team – not even reigning multiple world champions Red Bull – enjoy anything like that kind of performance advantage. In Mark Webber, Vettel has a team mate who has usually put him under more pressure than Massa has Alonso. That is set to change.

For Ferrari, rehiring Raikkonen has the added benefit of throwing down the gauntlet to Red Bull, who passed him over in favour of promoting Daniel Ricciardo. But it does raise the question why Ferrari they let him go in the first place.

How will Alonso react?

Fernando Alonso, Ferrari, Sepang, 2013The most fascinating aspect of today’s news is how Alonso will respond to being partnered with a competitive team mate for the first time in seven years.

Alonso repeatedly made plain his preference was for Massa to remain at the team. Alonso described the pairing as a “very strong team” and reiterated his support for his team mate on the day before Massa’s departure was announced.

Alonso has not come under serious pressure from the other half of his team’s garage since he was teamed with Lewis Hamilton at McLaren in 2007. The explosive consequences of Alonso’s demands for preferential treatment not being met are well known. Relations between Alonso and McLaren deteriorated to the extent that he tipped the FIA off about the team’s use of confidential information from (ironically) Ferrari which he had been involved in.

Renault team principal Flavio Briatore was more willing to indulge Alonso’s ‘number one’ preference during their time at Renault. But it’s hard to imagine Raikkonen being willing to go to the lengths some of Alonso’s team mates have to support his title chances.

In his last Ferrari stint Raikkonen showed he was willing to yield to his team mate when his own championship chances were over – as he did at Shanghai in 2008.

But would he give up a clear shot at a race win while still in contention for the championship, as Massa did for Alonso at Hockenheim three years ago? Would he tolerate Ferrari purposefully earning him a five-place grid penalty so his team mate could gain a position on the grid, as they did in America last year? Or spend time trying to help his team mate in qualifying by giving him a tow, as Massa did last weekend?

Some Ferrari insiders apparently believe Alonso will easily have the beating of Raikkonen. But both are top-drawer drivers and there are going to be days when one is ahead of the other. And it’s hard to imagine a fellow world champion of Alonso’s, who fought him for the title in 2005, being as subservient as Massa has.

Over to you

How will Ferrari handle having two top drivers in their team next year? And which of the two will come out on top? Have your say in the comments.

2013 F1 season

Browse all 2013 F1 season articles

Images ?? Ferrari/Ercole Colombo

Advert | Go Ad-free


158 comments on Ferrari put two roosters in their hen house

  1. I never thought this day would come. My two favourite F1 drivers driving for my favourite team, whoever wins would make me equally happy. I can’t wait to see Kimi wearing red again.
    It’s all speculation about who’se gonna beat who until next season. But this is the most exciting pairing ever. It would definetly raise the bar for both drivers and they will try beating each other at any cost but I don’t believe it would end up in tears like McLaren in 2007.
    Speaking of McLaren – now that’s a team that is really fcked right now. They don’t have any of the ‘best drivers’ and that I think will cost them dearly. Expect them to be the top of the midfield again in 2014.

    • mantresx (@mantresx) said on 11th September 2013, 16:41

      For all we know Pérez could be one of the top drivers of the future, anyway if the car is dominant even an ok driver can fight for a championship, 2015 is the best chance Mclaren will have.

    • If McLaren produce a very good car and the Mercedes engine is more advanced than the others, as speculated, then they might not be ******, regardless of their driver line-up. For all we know the Ferrari might be a dog of a car and Alonso will be fighting Raikkonen to just get in the points. Remember 2009 when Hamilton, Kubica and Alonso were fighting for the lower places sometimes?

  2. I think it is going to be just fine. Lewis and Jenson drover together for McLaren without much of a Fuss . I think it will turn out to be just like that.

    But my bet. Alonso will have a slight edge on Kimi in the race while Kimi will edge Alonso in the Qualifying .

  3. Arkansas said on 11th September 2013, 16:55

    Love both drivers. I’m a fan of ferrari solely because of Fer. But I think Ferrari made a mistake bringing Kimi back. I hope I’m wrong but I’m almost certain that sooner or later, a civil war is gonna unfold inside that team . Both drivers have HUGE egos and they wont accept by any means being #2’s. This is not gonna end well. Save my words.

  4. bull mello (@bullmello) said on 11th September 2013, 17:20

    Ferrari wishes to win and there is no room for complacency. With Byrne, Fry, Allison, Alonso, Raikkonen on the team Ferrari have the best people they can get to challenge Red Bull. A lot can happen when the lights go out and the cars are driven in anger. The number one driver at Ferrari next season will be the one who scores the most points. Alonso has the opportunity to demonstrate his driving skills and his level of maturity with another world champion on the same team. Kimi has already proven he can have a pragmatic view for teamwork at the right time. I respect the approach Ferrari is taking and their desire to win. There are already many predictions about what will and won’t happen next season with Alonso, Raikkonen and Ferrari. The intriguing fact is that nobody really knows, we must watch and see.

  5. krtekf1 (@krtekf1) said on 11th September 2013, 17:21

    Alonso-Raikonen in “Alo-Massa Hockenheim 2010″ situation:
    —>Radio: “Kimi, Alonso is faster than you!”. Kimi: “Yeah, than why is he behind me..???” ;)

  6. Jorge Lardone (@jorge-lardone) said on 11th September 2013, 17:35

    One thing is certain: Kimi never will accept crashing his car into the wall! Remember Singapore 2008?
    Alonso is the worst champion in the history of Formula 1 for his lack of sportsmanship.

    • Merv (@) said on 11th September 2013, 18:49

      As has been stated so many times, Alonso knew nothing of the plans to crash Piquet’s car.

      • Who can know for sure? All we know for fact is that Alonso was a key member in that team along with Briatore and a few others and usually key people know the same things. But as I said, we can’t know for sure, since what people say in public isn’t the same as what happened in a lot of cases, but they know we can’t prove them wrong so they just say it.

  7. Tayyib (@m0nzaman) said on 11th September 2013, 17:37

    Big Ferrari fan and massive fan of both drivers. What a lineup, arguably the strongest since Senna and Prost at McLaren. How Alonso reacts I dont know but hopefully he reacts in a positive manner. Cant wait to see the Iceman at Ferrari. As long as one of them brings the drivers title I dont mind. Just dont crash into each other.

  8. Mouse_Nightshirt (@mouse_nightshirt) said on 11th September 2013, 17:43

    I don’t think I particularly agree that Ferrari now have two “roosters”.

    Raikkonen is more like an ostrich. Goes for very very fast for a short period of time, then buries his head in the sand until it’s time to go running again.

  9. petebaldwin (@petebaldwin) said on 11th September 2013, 18:23

    It’s going to be amazing to see 2 competitive Ferrari’s next year. I can’t wait! Now Ferrari, please, DESIGN A COMPETITIVE CAR!

    I’m a Hamilton fan but I’d love to see Ferrari design the fastest car and for those two to battle it out for the title.

  10. It’s a great driver pairing and can’t wait for the 2014 season …

    By reading the comments I get the feeling that many people wants to see them(especially Alonso) fighting off the track than on the track …. I wonder if these two were to get along well at Ferrari quite a lot of people will be disappointed… really sad, Rather than hoping to see great on track battles between them many people want to see them creating a rift in Ferrari…

  11. Fernando Alonso has brought this upon himself. His risky take has been, since last year, that when he does well, it is Alonso, and when he doesn’t, it’s the bad car. Last year’s assessments of the car were completely blown out of proportions, when Alonso stated that his car was around a second slower than the Red Bull – where was he living? Him asking for a better car for his birthday was only another example of him putting pressure on the team, but keeping the glory mostly to himself. He might have even had an agenda of getting rid of Stefano to maybe have Flavio run the team.
    Hiring Kimi was a victory for the current team chef, and, let’s be honest, a clear defeat for Alonso. I’m not quite sure that this was the end of that.

    • Deb Luhi (@debeluhi) said on 12th September 2013, 0:42

      I had a similar thought when the news broke. Last year he was placed among the gods by the media and his big fan base and praised as the best driver in F1, and voted as the “Driver of the Year” by the team principals and drivers. Although he had a very good year I don’t necessarily agree with that image of Alonso as it was in big part build and promoted by himself, as you mentioned too. Also the media needed to hype up Alonso so the comparisons with Vettel were more interesting. As for the Driver of the Year, I think other teams and drivers were a bit envious of Red Bull and Vettel’s success.
      However, this year after the good start things went backwards and Alonso started again with the same story, that the car is not good. I think Ferrari doesn’t share this opinion. Is it possible that other teams made such a big progress in a short time while Ferrari stagnated? Or it may be Alonso is getting complacent with his star status in the team and demands more from others while not putting enough himself.
      I think Ferrari wanted to shake up Alonso a little bit and make him more focused so he’ll start performing even better.
      As for who’ll get on top at Ferrari, we’ll see next year. Ferrari wouldn’t care too much as long as they are on the top of the standings.

  12. The explosive consequences of Alonso’s demands for preferential treatment not being met are well known

    I do not want to re-open a long debate about that, but it seems to me you put like facts, things that up to date are merely opinions. We have only heard opinions of British press and Ron Dennis declarations (and not regarding Alonso demands) but the other part (Alonso and his stakeholders) were obliged to sign a NDA before leaving the team. Are you not curious about what have Alonso to say about that year? I’m pretty sure there is another complete different view of what happened. Probably will not be the “absolute truth” in Alonso side but definitively is not in the other either.

    • +1, completely agree with you .

      “Relations between Alonso and McLaren deteriorated to the extent that he tipped the FIA off about the team’s use of confidential information from (ironically) Ferrari ”

      I thought Ron Dennis’s “allegation” was that Alonso threatened him that he will reveal the whole spy gate thing to FIA and Ron Dennis himself phoned the FIA…

  13. rampante (@rampante) said on 11th September 2013, 20:44

    Thankfully F1 is not conducted in a play ground. Alonso is quoted in Italy as being happy with the appointment and the challenge. Raikkonen much the same. Can it only be in the UK one is accused of being a blackmailer and the other only eats ice cream? Time to grow up people and understand that the team everyone either loves or hates has the best line up for next year. With the new regs don’t expect anything but surprises. The RBR may be the best car now because the regulations suited the Newey design. Some of us (old enough) remember when his cars couldn’t finish a race. Williams/force India could have the fastest car next year the same way brawn appeared from nowhere.

  14. F1Rollout (@f1rollout) said on 11th September 2013, 23:33

    Weather Alonso beats Raikkonen or vice versa. They will take care of Vettel and Seb and thats enough for me to be extremely happy :)

  15. At least, most journalists and fans will stop saying about Alonso that he is blocking or vetoing some decisions)
    Sorrowfully, Massa is out, but I’m extremely happy with these news.
    As I remember, Alonso and Raikkonen almost haven’t fought against each other for a position. I mean, their fights were more strategic (“who is going to make better pit stop call”). They didn’t directly fight for a position, when someone attacks and the other defends. And now, my wish is realized.

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.