Felipe Massa, Ferrari, Yas Marina, 2013

F1 demeans itself with double points gimmick

CommentPosted on | Author Keith Collantine

Felipe Massa, Ferrari, Yas Marina, 2013Yesterday’s FIA announcement that double points will be awarded for the last race of 2014 was a worrying sign Formula One’s dependence on gimmicks has become an addiction.

It was met with howls of derision from F1 Fanatic readers. Over 300 comments, the vast majority of which sharply critical of the plan, appeared on the article in less than 12 hours.

Some expressed the hope that this was not a realistic proposal, merely an exercise in off-season headline-grabbing, such as the suggestion that artificial sprinklers could be used to create more wet weather races.

I am not so optimistic. The sprinklers plan was concocted solely by Bernie Ecclestone and mentioned to a few reporters to guarantee F1 a few column inches in the winter months.

But the plan to double points for the final race of the season was unanimously approved by F1’s new Strategy Group and the Formula One Commission, and rubber-stamped by Jean Todt himself.

“These changes are immediately applicable, given the mandate assigned to the FIA President at the last World Motor Sport Council meeting, held on 4 December in Paris,” the FIA press release noted. Double points for the last race of 2014 will happen unless all concerned take their sensible pills over the holidays.

The decision to devalue 18 of the 19 races on the 2014 F1 calendar was taken “to maximise focus on the championship until the end of the campaign”.

One would not have to be unduly cynical to note this unexpected rules change coincided with Abu Dhabi’s relocation to the end of the season. Have the Yas Marina circuit owners coughed up some extra money for a double-points end-of-season ‘spectacular’?

Nor should it be forgotten that the teams’ FIA entry fees are directly linked to the number of points they score. That may diminish hopes the new rule will be weeded out before the V6 engines fire up in Melbourne in 94 days’ time.

But there remains the possibility that those in charge will realise the self-defeating folly of introducing a rule purportedly to make F1 more appealing which the vast majority of fans actively dislike.

In the social media era the FIA, FOM and teams have no excuses for failing to be aware of popular opinion. The reaction against the new rule has been voluble and extremely negative.

At the time of writing 90% of almost 600 responses to this F1 Fanatic poll are against the plan: a point made by The Times in its story on the new rules*.

It sends a depressing signal that those in charge of F1 no long view it as a ‘sport’ but merely as ‘entertainment’ – something to be manipulated by any means necessary to produce a storyline.

This is why so many fans oppose the plan so strongly and will no doubt continue to put those complaints to the teams and the FIA on Twitter, Facebook and every available avenue over the coming weeks.

It is a worrying trend in the development of Formula One’s rules. When a football match ends nil-nil a cry does not go up for goals to be widened for any team which is struggling to score. Yet in DRS that was F1’s response to the difficulty of overtaking.

If a football season is decided before the concluding matches, do they increase the points for the final game? Of course not.

Those running F1 need to have the some faith in their core product, wean themselves off their addiction to gimmicks and work at the deeper problems affecting the sport. Such as the negative effect aerodynamic turbulence has always had on the racing, and why F1 has gone 18 years without a full grid of cars.

*Subscription required


Browse all comment articles

Image ?ι?® Ferrari/Ercole Colombo

Posted on Categories CommentTags ,

Promoted content from around the web | Become an F1 Fanatic Supporter to hide this ad and others

  • 237 comments on “F1 demeans itself with double points gimmick”

    Jump to comment page: 1 2 3 4 5
    1. This is why so many fans oppose the plan so strongly and will no doubt continue to put those complaints to the teams and the FIA on Twitter, Facebook and every available avenue over the coming weeks.

      @keith I like what you’ve done there

    2. I think f1 has ridiculed itself enough with the tyres and DRS. In addition to that there is a lot of frustration from fans when the sport was dominated by a technical head over the past 4 seasons.

      But none of that compares to this ridiculous double points race in Abu Dhabi

      I cant watch this sport for much longer.

    3. Another concern: we’re talking about cost cutting but now teams must develop new componenents for the car until the last race, because the last race is so important … instead of already focussing on next year’s car …

    4. In other sports news, FIFA announce that goals scored in stoppage time will count double from next year’s World Cup.

    5. This is basically a slightly ahead of time glimpse at what the sport will be like when it is entirely, completely run by invisible soulless businessmen and not mostly run by invisible soulless corporate businessmen.

    6. What they could do instead is simply change the points structure to award more points for the win and less points for 2nd, 3rd.

      And they can restrict aerodynamic development. This is mainly where the costs come from and where performance between the teams can become uncompetitive. And like Keith said, current aero restricts overtaking.

    7. I’m suprised that Bernie hasn’t picked up an idea or two from other game-shows. Like audience participation. How about a phone in vote from viewers electing which driver gets a 10 second stop-go penalty, or bonus extra seconds for their KERS. I’m sure that this would bring in many more viewers of the type that Bernie is trying to attract.

      1. Or a great big puddle of mud in the run off area covered with a light tarpaulin painted like tarmac, imagine the fun when a car ran off the track and ended up buried in mud, hahahoho ha a anha ha then the driver has to hahahohoho wade through the mud hahahohohoha, priceless TV, the ratings will go through the roof.

    8. Nascar has the concept of Chase for the Cup where only the top 13 fight for the championship in the final 10 races This is considered as the chase. I AM NOT A SUpporter of even that concept as it undervalues the the effort put in through the 3/4 of the year. For me the double points seems to be more of a some commercial impact business decision than a decision made for the sake of the sport. If it was a sport related decision the teams and the strategy group would have very easily said no to this.

    9. I read through the press release for these changes with a smile of satisfaction on my face, until I got to this point. All changes were positive for F1 except for double points. It just doesn’t make any sense.

    10. It will go away when Ferrari first get bitten by it.

    11. why not introduce championship ballast. works great in btcc. even split the race into two one hour races and have a random reverse grid in the second. if all else fails introduce a mandatory safety car half way throughout he race. it would back the pack up you would guarantee at least two pit stops then. limit the drs to a set amount of time throughout the race and even a push to pass button. works great in indy car and gives a half believable way of areodynamic juggernoughts being able to pass each other

    12. If F1 wants to become gimmicky, don’t half-ass it; if you want gimmicky entertainment, go all the way. Bring in sprinklers. Bring in temporary nitrous boost. Bring in banana peels drivers can toss onto the course (everybody gets 3, unless they somehow can pick up the peels that other drivers have thrown). Bring in medals for the rest of the races. Bring in shortcuts that can be used only a few laps per race. Bring in fan voting systems that allow them to dictate who is penalized and who is rewarded.

      I’m sure there’s a fanbase for Super Formula Mario (let’s face it, I would probably watch it), but let F1 continue with the serious racing.

      I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: heavily restricted aero, more mechanical grip, and increase power. I want to see F1 drivers struggling to put power down. I was watching some old Top Gear, and during their Senna tribute (Series 15) I noticed (again) how the old cars were always squirming under power/braking and you could see the drivers really having to work their cars. That’s what I want. Keep the modern gearboxes and brakes; aerodynamics are interesting, but not when they are the determining factor in a season.

    13. The conspiracy theorist in me is beginning to wonder if this isn’t all part of a master plan by the FIA to get rid of CVC, or FOM, or something.

      Step 1: Make F1 completely ridiculous. DRS and disintegrating tyres were only the beginning. Unique numbers means loud, driver-specific merchandise. Double points. Some more ludicrous proposals.
      Step 2: Proper fans leave. But because they’re motorsport junkies, they begin watching other classes of racing. Most of these are sanctioned by – surprise, surprise – the FIA. So the FIA retains the repeat eyeballs.
      Step 3: Without proper fans providing the base, the glitterati fall out of love with F1. They were only here because the crowds and the flashy cars made it seem glamourous. No crowds and anteater/phallus-nosed cars means no glamour.
      Step 4: No glitterati means tracks stop paying Bernie/CVC for the “privilege” of hosting a race.
      Step 5: F1 becomes toxic. CVC wants to sell.
      Step 6: FIA/Consortium of teams swoop in and buy the now-depreciated F1 for a pittance.
      Step 7: F1 is reborn with pre-’97 regs and no Bernie.

      Hey, a guy can dream!

      1. Too bad the actual plan is closer to:

        Step 1 – Regulation changes
        Step 2 – ???
        Step 3 – Profit

      2. What a great dream, if only I didn’t have to wake up.

    14. F1 is becoming wacky races ,it will be the laughing stock of motorsport .
      why not just have the last race and be done with it . being champion will mean nothing .

    15. Why don’t you make it a 1000 points for a win, and hold the final race on the Moon !

      I think this is well and truly the craziest thing I’ve ever heard. How can the best driver over the course of the season, just lose it in one final ( I could have a cold .. oh well !)race ? It devalues the previous races, and smacks of nothing more than a move to get more money. If not, whoever make’s these rules up, are seriously off their rockers. F1 is boring these days, I really think you’ve just killed the sport in one move.

      Good luck watching those numbers of fans dwindle.. You’ve lost me well and truly, F1 Champion now means nothing.

    16. I bet Bernie is already cooking up the next gimmick…pole sitter using only 3 tyres at Yas Marina :)

    17. This new rule is so inspiring – let me suggest some more:
      – Points awarded for best livery (phone-in vote)
      – Points awarded for evening drag race runs between qualy and race
      – Points awarded for most tires saved after the season – 5 points per tire
      – Points awarded for most fuel saved after the season – 1 point per liter
      – Points awarded for most daring podium interview comment
      – 1 points awarded for entering the Monaco tunnel on even seconds – minus 1 point on odd ones
      – “Safe” points awarded for anyone in row one and two who doesn’t enter the race – say 15 points
      – Points awarded for most even doughnut
      – 100 random points awarded to whoever has already finished at the number on a ball picked out of a crystal jar by a monkey wearing a smoking on the podium after the race…..

      – and so on and so on. What a fantastic show we could have!
      (No, really, I am crying!)

      1. That would be fantastic! LOL

      2. You forgot 15 points for Maldonado in every race he doesn’t crash into anyone else.

    18. David (@mansellsmoustache)
      10th December 2013, 23:34

      I honestly thought it was April 1st when I logged into F1Fanatic yesterday…

    19. I think if they want to add interest, they should award double points for the toughest, best tracks. Give double points for Spa, Suzuka and Imola. Maybe a bonus for winning pole at Monaco, and for staying awake through any race at a Tilke curcuit.

    20. This double points idea is DREADFULL right up there with sprinklers to wet the track on purpose!! All about “entertainment” to capture casual fans… All that’s missing now is for them to ask viewers to vote for their favourite driver for extra points and soap opera storylines for each of each of them. Why can’t they just ditch the crumbly tyres DRS kers and this latest pile of nonsense and go back to honest of goodness racing where the best man/car combo wins. As has been said f1 wasn’t booke so why wrek it?!

    Jump to comment page: 1 2 3 4 5

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    All comments are moderated. See the Comment Policy and FAQ for more.