To my mind, 2006 was not the best year for wheel-to-wheel racing in F1 – and this season so far has been even worse.
But I think F1 is better to be rid of the massive and somewhat artificial swings in performance we saw last year – such as when Toyota suddenly locked out the second row of the grid at Suzuka just because Bridgestone had brought better tyres.
Has the end of the tyre war and the use of more conservative tyres made the racing worse?
Is the rule forcing drivers to use two different compounds during the race improving the action at all, or is it just a gimmick? Leave your comments below.
Photo: GEPA / Mathias Kneipeiss
- F1 will get ‘red tyre’ rule
- Tyre bore
- Debate: 22 best drivers in the world?
- Debate: More street tracks good for F1?
- Debate: Will Ferrari surge to the titles?
- Debate: Is it all over for Button?
- Debate: Any sympathy for McLaren?
- Debate: Has F1 been brought into disrepute?
- Debate: Youth vs experience
- Debate: Where should the United States Grand Prix be held?
- Debate: The best ITV F1 title theme tune
- Debate: When did you start watching F1?
- Join in more debates
Promoted content from around the web | Become an F1 Fanatic Supporter to hide this ad and others