2011 Indian Grand Prix result

2011 Indian Grand Prix

Pos # Driver Car Laps Gap Difference Reason
1 1 Sebastian Vettel Red Bull-Renault 60
2 4 Jenson Button McLaren-Mercedes 60 8.433 8.433
3 5 Fernando Alonso Ferrari 60 24.301 15.868
4 2 Mark Webber Red Bull-Renault 60 25.529 1.228
5 7 Michael Schumacher Mercedes 60 65.421 39.892
6 8 Nico Rosberg Mercedes 60 66.851 1.430
7 3 Lewis Hamilton McLaren-Mercedes 60 84.183 17.332
8 19 Jaime Alguersuari Toro Rosso-Ferrari 59 1 lap 1 lap
9 14 Adrian Sutil Force India-Mercedes 59 1 lap 15.738
10 17 Sergio Perez Sauber-Ferrari 59 1 lap 2.590
11 10 Vitaly Petrov Renault 59 1 lap 0.877
12 9 Bruno Senna Renault 59 1 lap 11.671
13 15 Paul di Resta Force India-Mercedes 59 1 lap 3.945
14 20 Heikki Kovalainen Lotus-Renault 58 2 laps 1 lap
15 11 Rubens Barrichello Williams-Cosworth 58 2 laps 14.962
16 25 Jerome D’Ambrosio Virgin-Cosworth 57 3 laps 1 lap
17 22 Narain Karthikeyan HRT-Cosworth 57 3 laps 0.586
18 23 Daniel Ricciardo HRT-Cosworth 57 3 laps 31.836
19 21 Jarno Trulli Lotus-Renault 55 5 laps 2 laps
Not classified
6 Felipe Massa Ferrari 32 28 laps 23 laps Suspension
18 Sebastien Buemi Toro Rosso-Ferrari 24 36 laps 8 laps Engine
12 Pastor Maldonado Williams-Cosworth 12 48 laps 12 laps Gearbox
24 Timo Glock Virgin-Cosworth 1 59 laps 11 laps Accident
16 Kamui Kobayashi Sauber-Ferrari 0 60 laps 1 lap Accident

2011 Indian Grand Prix

Browse all 2011 Indian Grand Prix articles

Advert | Go Ad-free

43 comments on 2011 Indian Grand Prix result

  1. Eggry (@eggry) said on 30th October 2011, 11:11

    Great effort from Button but it wasn’t enough. Alonso still managed to get on the podium while Webber failed again. I don’t know what happened between Massa and Hamilton(I was doing something else) but it is shame both of them ruined.

  2. Prisoner Monkeys (@prisoner-monkeys) said on 30th October 2011, 11:13

    Argh, I’m disappointed Petrov couldn’t get Perez. He was within two-tenths of a second going into Turn 4, but Perez was faster across the back half.

  3. AndrewTanner (@andrewtanner) said on 30th October 2011, 11:17

    Great result for Karthikeyan and Sutil today, they did their teams and country (if applicable!) proud.

    Grand Slam for Vettel too. Bonus!

  4. matt90 (@matt90) said on 30th October 2011, 11:19

    What happened to Senna?

    • He lost Kers early on and then I have no idea except he pitted very late

    • bananarama (@bananarama) said on 30th October 2011, 11:25

      I’ve wondered that myself. We didn’t see much of his race but it looked clean, yet strategy looked weird with a stop at the very end and Petrov driving through the grass everywhere still ending up in front. Weird but maybe he was just kinda slow ..

      • Prisoner Monkeys (@prisoner-monkeys) said on 30th October 2011, 11:33

        Weird but maybe he was just kinda slow

        It’s been a bit of a recurring theme of late. He was 15th in Singapore, after starting 15th, and while the car was horrendous around Marina Bay, Vitaly Petrov has been doing much more with it – Senna was 16th in Japan after qualifying 9th (Petrov started 10th and finished 9th); he was 13th in Korea after starting 15th (Petrov qualified 8th and was comfortably inside the top ten when he crashed); and now he started 14th in India and finished 12th (when Petrov went from 16th to 11th having shown pace that was good enough for the top ten in qualifying). And, of course, there was his mistake at the start in Belgium. In fact, the only truly good race Senna has had was at Monza, and even then, Petrov was getting more out of the car.

        I think Bruno Senna has piqued too soon.

        • matt90 (@matt90) said on 30th October 2011, 11:48

          Generally he was doing quite well until the end though. He was running comfortably 9th, then I kind of zoned out and now see he finished 12th. Shame. I still think he has potential.

          • Prisoner Monkeys (@prisoner-monkeys) said on 30th October 2011, 11:51

            Generally he was doing quite well until the end though.

            Except for the way his strategy fell apart. Sure, if we were only assessing drivers for 58 of the 60 laps, then Senna did fine – but he blew it on the strategy.

            I still think he has potential.

            Petrov is getting more out of the car on a more regular basis. Ever since Senna has climbed into the car, Petrov has out-qualified, out-raced and out-scored Senna more often than Senna has Petrov.

          • matt90 (@matt90) said on 30th October 2011, 12:08

            Except for the way his strategy fell apart.

            Yeah, I just didn’t realise his strategy was able to fall apart- I thought he had that place essentially secured, which is why I was surprised to see him having dropped down.

          • bananarama (@bananarama) said on 30th October 2011, 12:18

            On the other hand its not his job to take care of the strategy during the race, he uis just supposed to tell his team how car and tyres are doing and they have to make the best strategy of it. Seems they could have done better but maybe it was simply the 50 laps without kers that cost him quite a bit of time. We’ll probably see more when Keith puts up the Renault eace analysis.

          • Prisoner Monkeys (@prisoner-monkeys) said on 30th October 2011, 12:44

            he is just supposed to tell his team how car and tyres are doing and they have to make the best strategy of it.

            We have seen plenty of drivers make strategy calls in the past – remember Jenson Button pitting early in Australia last year, taking the intermediate tyres? He went on to win the race.

            Even if Senna’s strategy is decided for him, he needs to make it work.

          • matt90 (@matt90) said on 30th October 2011, 14:25

            It is different in a dry race though. Button made that call based on the grip levels at the time. In this case the ideal strategy is the one that gets the driver to the end of the race quickest, and that isn’t something a driver can know, it’s for strategists to calculate. That Petrov beat him suggests somebody got it wrong or, as bananarama says, perhaps KERS did cost him a heap of time.

  5. Congrats to the podium occupants as they were all brilliant today.

    Michael and Heikki were both impressive too. I do hope Michael can finish ahead of Ros at the next two races and beat him in the standings.

    I actually was one of the few people on Twitter (at least in my timeline) who thought Massa was responsible for the crash however, I’m sick to death of the stewards. Cynically, I think that they’re willing to give penalties now the championship is over otherwise the best case scenario is they’re just not consistent. This was a racing incident that hurt the pair of them. The exact same thing happened with Lewis at Spa with Kobayashi (which I felt deserved a penalty because it was so violent and had been a repeat offence) and at Suzuka to name a couple but they didn’t get a penalty. I accepted it was a racing incident at the time because it was very hard to call but this wasn’t any worse and gets a penalty. I have no idea what the stewards are on- actually, no-one does because they fail to release the reasoning behind their actions which means it’s impossible to see whether they are being consistent or not. We just have to have faith in a body that’s attracted a lot of criticism over the years. What annoys me the most though is that penalties are then handed out with little information and the drivers have to oblige or they received a DSQ which couldn’t be any more totalitarian if it tried. There’s no chance or an appeal it’s just ” do as I say because I say so or you’re out”. They’ve been winding me up since Malaysia so this has just pushed me over the edge :P

    • bananarama (@bananarama) said on 30th October 2011, 11:34

      I’d really like to know the reasoning behind the decisions aswell. I guess Massa saw Hamilton and decided he can’t overtake into that corner so he’d either brake or crash and seemed to be fine with both. Hamilton looked like he realized aswell he wouldn’t get by there and tried to avoid it but then it all was done already. Afterall I agree it lookd like just a racing incident (Lewis just said the same in german tv too).

    • AndrewTanner (@andrewtanner) said on 30th October 2011, 11:36

      @Steph I think the very least they can do is release their justification for the incident. They’re almost as bad as FIFA for playing their cards close to their chest. Consistency I guess is a little harder to implement, given how the panel of stewards is made up.

    • sumedh said on 30th October 2011, 11:47

      I said it on live chat too, penalties are being given dependent upon which party got hurt more out of the incident and not upon who actually made the mistake.

      At Spa, Lewis did not get a penalty because a crash out of the race was deemed as a good enough penalty. Similarly, he got penalty for the Maldonado and Massa incidents in Monaco because the other driver was hurt.
      Here, Hamilton was the party that came worse off the incident and hence Massa got the penalty.

      That is the only consistency that stewards are showing to the viewing public.

    • matt90 (@matt90) said on 30th October 2011, 11:55

      I think the problem is that the incident caused Hamilton to pit and lost him positions. I think Singapore where Hamilton hit Massa was fairly minor, but as it caused a puncture it was probably fair that he received a penalty. Massa hit Hamilton, even if it was simply a racing incident he was the one who caused it, and had both drivers been able to continue it probably would and should have gone unpunished. But Massa ruined Hamilton’s race. Why should Massa cause a crash and benefit from it (he wasn’t overtaken as he should have been)?

  6. Paul Buchanan said on 30th October 2011, 11:25

    Again another boring race! Worst season ever. Sky can have f1!

  7. actually Massa was targeting the kerb there, Ham just blocking his way …racing incident in this respect.

  8. sumedh said on 30th October 2011, 11:53

    FIA can make an official review of the 2011 season by using only Hamilton and Massa alone. It will be a hit!

  9. Prisoner Monkeys (@prisoner-monkeys) said on 30th October 2011, 11:56

    I’m disappointed for Pastor Maldonado. He’s taking a lot of criticism for being a pay driver and for his little episode with Lewis Hamilton at Spa, but despite a shaky start, he’s regularly holding his own against Rubens Barrichello in the races, particularly on the circuits he has never seen before. He might not be a future race-winner, but I think he’s earned his place in Formula 1. So it’s been cruel to see his headway paralysed by unreliability in the last few Grands Prix.

    • BasCB (@bascb) said on 30th October 2011, 12:58

      Its another race where he could have gotten points if not for technical problems (and Hamilton in Monaco).
      I really think he is doing fine, just the car is so unconsistent its hard to spot.

  10. themagicofspeed (@) said on 30th October 2011, 12:03

    Absolutely disgusted at the stewards judgement on Massa. Hamilton went for a gap that was always going to disappear, and when he saw that Massa had turned in (which, being ahead, he was fully entitled to do), he made no attempt to avoid a collision, which makes it deliberate. Massa had the line into the corner, was still ahead and was entitled do defend his position and close the door, wether he saw Hamilton or not. It’s up to Hamilton to recognise that Massa was not going to give him the place on a plate, back out of it to avoid a collision and try again. He deliberately went straight on into Massa. IMO this should have been a black flag for hamilton for dangerous and unsportsmanlike driving. Whatever your views on it, Massa had every right to defend the place. Frankly, the stewards have proved that racing is no longer racing, if you’re not allowed to defend your place. Another example of Hamilton using his usual tactic of ramming drivers off the track if he can’t get past. That behaviour is unacceptable in karting let alone F1. Disgusting

  11. 1 of the 3 said on 30th October 2011, 12:09

    Very pleased for Sutil. He got the result needed when the pressure was on. He held off the charging Perez and Petrov. He’s good and gets the job done as always.

    The way I see it Force India can learn a lot from Renault and their dropping of Heidfeld who is still 10th in the points. So bring in “fresh” talent and lose consistency IMO.

    Lastly, if FI manages to stay ahead of the rest of the mid-field it is thanks to Adrian Sutil and his 11th place standing in the points.

  12. akshay.it (@akshay-it) said on 30th October 2011, 12:23

    Force India needs a better strategist..

  13. wasiF1 (@wasif1) said on 31st October 2011, 1:47

    Good job by Jaime Alguersuari again,tough luck for Sebastien Buemi.

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.