Advertisement

Force India launch VJM03 (Pictures)

9 February 2010 by Keith Collantine
Force India VJM03

Force India VJM03

Force India have revealed their 2010 F1 car, the VJM03.

The team say the car is an evolution of last year’s VJM02 – but they expect it to be strong on more than just low-downforce tracks. Here are the first pictures of the VJM03.

The team are using Mercedes engines for the second year in a row. They are one of few teams to being 2010 with the same drivers they ended 2009 with – Adrian Sutil and Vitantonio Liuzzi.

Liuzzi will give the car its first public run during testing at Jerez tomorrow.

The team has also announced Paul di Resta has joined them as a reserve driver and will participate during some Grand Prix weekends on Fridays.

Designer Mark Smith said the new car is an evolution of last year’s VJM02, which scored the team’s first ever points with second place at Spa:

The VJM03 is definitely an evolution of the VJM02 in terms of the design philosophies we have developed at Force India over the last year. We are very happy with the direction, therefore we have opted to evolve the car rather than significantly revise.

Obviously one of the major aspects we have had to contend with are regulation changes which have had a considerable impact on some aspects of the design of the car. The removal of refuelling from races increases the amount of fuel needed to be stored in the cars – almost twice the amount we ran in 2009. There is a compromise now: either make the car much longer or wider, or, as we have done, a combination of both. This of course has influenced the mechanical design solutions and also the aerodynamics, specifically with respects to the diffuser and bodywork.

Even with the ban of double diffusers for 2011, we recognise that we still have to push as much as we possibly can in this area in 2010 as we have targets to meet and the double diffuser is a key development aspect of the car.

The VJM02 was a relatively low drag car that showed well on the low downforce tracks. As was demonstrated throughout 2009, that was a useful attribute but as we go into 2010 we have tried to maintain a high level of aerodynamic efficiency, but we recognise that our championship position will be enhanced by a general level of performance that is suited to all types of circuits. We have, we believe, quite an efficient car overall.
Mark Smith

Read more from the team: Sutil, Liuzzi and Szafnauer interviews

Force India VJM03 launch pictures

Force India VJM03 launch video

2010 F1 car launches

Images (C) Force India F1 Team

Share: | | |

Read more: 2010 F1 season | Articles in full | F1 Pictures | F1 teams (active) | Force India

131 responses to Force India launch VJM03 (Pictures)

  1. kaushal says:

    typo: it should be VJMO3 in the 1st line

  2. Becken says:

    You beat Autosport!

  3. Nick says:

    Quite uninspired, I had a my fingers crossed they were going to do something good this year after an impressive run towards the end of 09. Having said that one thing I have come to realise over the years is a car doesn’t need to look fast to be fast.

    • Tim says:

      By the end of 2009 the VJM02 was a fairly handy chassis and the Mercedes engine remains the benchmark.

      With that in mind, a logical development of the VJM02 (which is what the VJM03 appears to be) around the larger fuel tank is a sensible solution, especially for a team on a tight budget. The new car looks fairly neat and tidy. Unless Force India have made any major design errors, the VJM03 should keep the team well ahead of STR and the new entrants while allowing them to scrap with Renault, Williams and Sauber for points.

      Sadly, modern F1 regulations are so tightly defined that the days of Colin Chapman/Gordon Murray-style great leaps forward and F1 cars looking radically different from one another are over.

    • John H says:

      Have a closer look. This car has a few nice suprises it seems.

  4. Kovy says:

    I formally request we ban shark fins.

  5. Vikas says:

    Those are the colours of our national flag geemac :)

    • GeeMac says:

      I know I know. What I meant to say was that the VJM01 had that gold, red and white look which didn’t quite work. So I’m glad they stuck with the VJM02’s orange white and green livery.

      • Calum says:

        I like the fct they have kept it becuause it gives a uniform and offers stability to a grid slot that has had so many names throughout the years. Forece India incarnation has lasted 3 years now , I hope they remain to show they aren’t just making up numbers.

  6. varun says:

    I thought those winglets they have near the cockpit were illegal 2009 onwards..

    And their website is down..no surprises there??

  7. ajokay says:

    Looks very simple against what we’ve seen already, much like the Renault. The livery looks good though, another of few that works with the green Bridgestones. I hope they have a decent year this year. I’m sure they can be semi-regular points scorers what with the kitty stretching all the way to 10th now.

    Still think the shark fins and sidepod veins should be banned though, they really ruin the look of the cars.

  8. Deurmat says:

    the nose looks like renault form last year

  9. MikeinBeijing says:

    Looking good!

    I hope they don’t have to wait until Spa to shine.

  10. Hairs says:

    Shark fin looks Veeeeeery like McLaren’s interpretation. Are they using a flat BMW nose? Very conservative design, but we haven’t seen the diffuser yet.

  11. Adrian says:

    I like it… nuff said!!

  12. Vikas says:

    @ varun… appendages are allowed to within a certain radius around the cockpit

    • Dingle Dell says:

      Hope those appendages are banned as well in the coming season. They look ugly and a way to fix outboard mirrors to the cars. I miss inboard mirrors so dearly that now only Renault, McLaren and Mercedes GP have them. Freaking thanks to Ferrari for starting this up.

  13. sijs says:

    Looks good!! de nose seems a lot different!!

  14. JV says:

    Car looks good.I love this livery and hope they will score consistently this year.

  15. Offnya says:

    Looking really good!

  16. GeeMac says:

    Adrian Sutil = Worst helmet design of 2010?

    • Dingle Dell says:

      He has changed his helmet livery when Force India launced the VJM01 with that gold-ish livery. Sad, I prefer his original helmet when he first entered F1.

  17. sumedh says:

    Is it the longest car in the field now?

    From the photos atleast, it looks to be extremely long. Or is it just me?

    It is now the car with most alcoholic brands on it :) :)

    I counted 4, and plenty of small other names. The company’s health seems sound, inspite of those notices being served to them.

  18. Partha says:

    This looks like 2009 VJM 02. I cant see the front tires smaller than the rear ones.

  19. Ed says:

    Another car quite devoid of sponsors, apart from Mallya’s own companies/brands (Kingfisher, White & Mackay, Signature and Royal Challenge)

  20. Vikas says:

    Keith… whyte and mackay was on the car even last year

  21. PJA says:

    The car looks okay, maybe because the shark fin is white and the background in these pictures is white but for me the shark fin doesn’t look as bad as on some of the other cars. But I still don’t like the side pod aero pieces where they have mounted the mirrors, if I could ban one piece of aero on the grounds of looks I think it would be those rather than the shark fin.

  22. din says:

    I quite like their launch video available in their website.

  23. The front nose looks very R29.

  24. Nok1z says:

    wow… the car looks great.

  25. din says:

    Keith, can you do the usual comparison. VJM02 vs VJM03.

    Do you have pics of the diffuser?

  26. Meander says:

    For some reason this car still looks like a low downforce runner to me. Hope it’s less of a niche car than last year’s though.

  27. Satish says:

    LOL at crash happy Sutil in the second pic

  28. Robert McKay says:

    Interesting that Mark Smith has said they are planning to go back and put the adjustable front wing flaps on the car, which they stopped bothering with during last season, since they think there may be more scope for using them this year.

    • TheGreatCornholio says:

      Hopefully thats an indication that this years car will be able to make better use over a wider range of tracks! Hope so, really like these guys. Used to love Minardi who were always underdogs but knew how to have fun! Was totally gutted when Kimi got past Fisi at Spa last year, i even swore in front of my little boy! Whoops.

      • Tim says:

        Probably more an indication that being able to adjust the front wing during the race will be more useful to adapt to changing fuel loads.

    • BasCB says:

      Do de front wing flaps enable the driver to adapt better to changing fuel loads?

      That would be a good reason to get good at using them.

  29. BBT says:

    Personally I like it.

  30. Pat says:

    Initial feeling is it looks like a mish mash of last years Renault (nose) with last years Brawn front wing and Red Bulls 2008 side pods (front view)

  31. prudhwi says:

    Inimitable !!!!!

  32. graigchq says:

    I’m a general F1 fan rather than a follower of any one team, obviously being british, i cheered button on to the end last year, and thought it was a deserved victory, but aside from that, i’m rather a sucker for the underdog-coming-good. In that respect, i wish Vijay, Sutil and Liuzzi all the best this year, they work hard, settle for what points they can get, and i truly hope that they show the “new” guys how a small low-budget team should be run… go for points, hold your own, don’t be upset with low qualifying positions, and unlike Ferrari, just because they’re not winning, don’t just give up to concentrate on next year’s car.

    Go Force India, i predict their first F1 win this year, and really hope that it happens for them, there isn’t a more deserving group of people in the paddock in my opinion!!

    And what a fantastic looking car by the way!!

  33. Some comments have been deleted. Trolling and insulting other commenters is not allowed: F1Fanatic Comment Policy

    • Calum says:

      What does trolling mean, keith?

      • K says:

        “Trolling is the act of purposefully antagonizing other people on the internet, generally on message boards”

        All though there can be a fine line between trolling and playing devil’s advocate or being someone who generally holds contrary opinions. More uptight internet communities often consider people who express views outside their own to be trolls no matter how logical or reasonable the view is.

  34. nick says:

    it looks clean

  35. BasCB says:

    I think Fore India did a good job with their means.

    They now have an OK technical team, engineering support from one of the best teams in F1, probably the Benchmark engine.
    The car looks an improved version of last years car. As last years car was not to bad, showing real good on fast tracks, this is a good sign.
    The livery is a little bit nicer, with simpler lines.

    Yes i like it, hope the new teams will all be at this level or better in a year or 2.

  36. BBQ2 says:

    Thanks Keith for bringing some sanity here. I am not used to pple insulting others on this forum, that is why iam always here for good info.

    Good work mate! Keep it up!!

  37. Damon says:

    Farce India and Renault are the only new cars so far that aren’t last year’s RB clones.

    It’s quite surprising that even though Brawn was the winning car last year, nobody has decided to base their new aerodynamical design on last year’s Brawn.
    Usually the field was split in two main directions as far as the approach in building the chassis.

    This year the engineers have almost unanimously declared Adrian Newey’s last year’s Red Bull as having the superior solutions.
    That’s quite inmpressive I must say.

  38. My God! The same colours and the same design of 2009 car! Criativity is low there…

  39. Looks good. Let’s hope they can improve on last year’s performance.

  40. Matt says:

    Does anyone know why there is a small wing only on one side of the airbox?

  41. three4three says:

    Looks good, not a lot to add really, except the snowplough area seems well developed. Oh and FI I think is the only car on which the green ‘eco’ striped tyres look good! Anyone know what the zigzag where the mirrors used to be is for (on fourth studio shot from above)?
    And I’m loving Liuzzi’s helmet, class!

  42. Macca says:

    Liuzzi’s helmet looks the awesome.

  43. Pete says:

    It looks like Force India have taken a similar approach to the diffuser that Red Bull did last year. However, as Red Bull lowered and flattened the rear of the car over the diffuser in order to create a path of air to pull air out of the diffuser, it looks like Force India have raised the diffuser exit and then narrowed the rear of car towards this raised center section of the diffuser.

  44. Jacob says:

    dunno, where to write this as there is no forum, here is a pic of the new lotus 2010 car
    http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/81365

  45. doncakes says:

    Force India is official. We will see if they can improve on last years podium.

    I cant wait to see the Red Bull and USF1 cars!

  46. Gusto says:

    Have you noticed where the mirrors are attached?, they will be as good as useless.

  47. Gusto says:

    I meant to ask this ages ago, were do you think the wing settings we see on the presentation cars would be used, its defo not Monza but not quite Monaco?

  48. Harvs says:

    really good looking car! big improvement from last years car!

Leave a Reply

No swearing, insults, advertising or racial, sexual or similar discrimination allowed.

For more information see the F1Fanatic Comment Policy

Anti-Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

Has your comment not appeared? Try waiting a moment and then refresh the page. If it still doesn't appear and you've checked your comment meets the terms of our comment policy then contact F1Fanatic with the details of your comment so we can look into it.

If you wish to complain about a comment please contact the editor directly.